Face reality. There will be no coming together.

Division lines in our case will be created post-war IMO. You can't reason with unstable and the mentally ill.

The left and their leader Soros hate Trump so much they don't want peace, most of them didn't say it but they would have been elated if that bullet that hit his ear would have killed him.

It's disgusting


Will they calm down when JD is president or just turn their vile towards him is the question

I think the leftists will push the centrists more to the right but the crazies are still out there

quote:

---

Stop with the nonsense

---

I don’t think there will be a reissuing of Gray and Blue uniforms being led by Generals.

As I said, I have no idea what it will look like but future historians will look back and write it was a Civil War.

So you did get me to wonder how a ‘modern’ Civil War would look.

Our friend ChatGPT has a reasonable take on the subject………..

If the United States were to experience a modern “civil war” or civil-type conflict, it almost certainly would not resemble the 1860s with uniformed armies and clear battle lines. Today, such a conflict would look much different—messier, decentralized, and harder to distinguish from prolonged unrest. Based on historical patterns, political science research, and the U.S.’s current social, economic, and technological landscape, here’s how it could plausibly manifest:

?

1. Decentralized and Asymmetrical Conflict
• No large formal armies: Instead of North vs. South, conflict would likely involve loose networks of armed groups, paramilitaries, and militias.
• Asymmetry: Most violence would be sporadic and targeted, resembling insurgencies or terrorism more than set-piece battles.
• Localized: Certain states, regions, or even specific cities could see more clashes depending on political divides, demographics, and law enforcement posture.

?

2. Hybrid Warfare (Digital + Physical)
• Cyberattacks: Hacking of power grids, banking systems, communication networks, and even hospitals could become a major weapon.
• Disinformation: Social media would serve as both a propaganda tool and a way to incite or coordinate actions, deepening polarization.
• Drone usage: Small, commercially available drones could be used for surveillance or even weaponized.

?

3. Targeted Violence and Terror Tactics
• Critical infrastructure attacks: Power plants, highways, railroads, internet cables, or water systems could be sabotaged.
• Assassinations and intimidation: Political leaders, journalists, or community organizers could be targeted.
• Urban guerrilla warfare: Cities could experience sporadic car bombings, shootings, or riots rather than open street battles.

?

4. Fragmentation Rather Than Secession
• No clear “Confederacy”: The divisions today are ideological and urban-rural, not clean geographic splits like the 1860s.
• Patchwork zones of control: Some counties or cities might refuse to recognize federal/state authority, creating “autonomous zones” enforced by local militias or sympathetic law enforcement.

?

5. Economic and Social Collapse Effects
• Supply chain disruptions: Food, fuel, and medicine could be interrupted quickly, amplifying the humanitarian crisis.
• Mass displacement: People might flee cities or regions seen as hostile, leading to internal refugee flows.
• Black markets: Informal trade and barter systems could expand if national stability eroded.

?

6. Government and Military Response
• National Guard first: State governors would likely deploy Guardsmen to contain unrest.
• Federal military split risks: While the U.S. military has strong norms of unity, local defections or selective enforcement of orders could occur in extreme polarization.
• Law enforcement divide: Police loyalties could fracture along ideological lines, worsening instability.

?

7. International Dimension
• Foreign influence: External powers could exploit the chaos with cyber operations, funding proxy groups, or disinformation campaigns.
• Refugee pressure: Canada and Mexico might see an influx of people fleeing violence.
• Global instability: Financial markets and alliances would be heavily shaken, given the U.S.’s role in the global order.

?

Bottom Line

A modern U.S. “civil war” would not look like Gettysburg—it would look like a patchwork of insurgencies, targeted attacks, and systemic breakdown, closer to what political scientists call a “low-intensity conflict” or “domestic insurgency.” The battlefield would be cyberspace, infrastructure, and cities, not open fields. The danger wouldn’t be front-line battles, but the erosion of trust, safety, and the rule of law across wide areas of daily life.

There will be no coming together with the left, correct. That said, their numbers are dwindling with every act they do as rational people see their lunacy. More and more are coming to the light.

Any civil war in today’s America would probably look like the Yugoslav civil war in the 90s.

However I do believe you will see many instances of neighbors killing neighbors.

Had an incident two doors down yesterday where a person had a vigil to Charlie Kirk against their fence. Their fence got burned down. Could have burned their house down.

It’s going to get really ugly sports fans.

been saying this for a while.

You cannot save these people from themselves and they are too far gone to fix.

No war, just start moving to burbs or towns where people dont change their kids genders.

I didnt know tim pool posted here