- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

THE Little Brother Ohio State files a lawsuit against Michigan restaurant over drink name
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:07 pm
LINK
quote:
Ohio State University filed a trademark opposition lawsuit Wednesday against the Ann Arbor, Michigan-based restaurant The Brown Jug over a year-old trademark request involving beer and liquor called “Buckeyes Tears,” according to the United States Patent and Trademark Office online portal.
This isn’t the first time the “Buckeye Tears” branding has been attempted by Big Ten rival fans. In 2023, multiple Pennsylvania breweries owned by Penn State alumni collaborated on an IPA called “Buckeye Tears” to be released ahead of that season’s Ohio State-Penn State game, according to FOX Sports.
As it pertains to Wednesday’s trademark lawsuit, Ohio State is alledging The Brown Jug’s use of the “Buckeye Tears” trademark would damage the school’s brand by associating it with alcohol and potentially confuse consumers about the “Buckeyes” team name.
New York- and Pennsylvania-based trademark attorney Josh Gerben of Gerben IP suggested any claim by Ohio State that “Buckeye Tears” would lead consumers to confuse The Brown Jug’s promotional beer or liquor product with the school’s football program “seems like a stretch” in a blog posted to his website.
“It’s hard to imagine consumers thinking that they are drinking a ‘BUCKEYE TEARS’ product made or licensed by the University,” Gerben wrote. “The fact that the applicant is based in Ann Arbor only strengthens the perception that this is a tongue-in-cheek nod to the Michigan rivalry, not a genuine product made by the University.”
As part of it’s initial trademark application, filed last year, shows the “Buckeye Tears” branding would be limited to a local menu item, and doesn’t use any similar Ohio State-specific branding like the school’s colors or even a similar font.
“However, if ‘BUCKEYE TEARS’ beer or liquor actually comes to market using Ohio State’s colors, logos, or other indicia, the case for infringement would be much stronger,” Gerben wrote. “The University could argue that the branding intentionally leverages its identity, even if the intended audience is rival Michigan fans.”
The Brown Jug has until Oct. 6 to answer Ohio State University’s legal opposition as part of a proposed schedule that could see the case face trial in early 2027.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:08 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
This is the softest shite ive ever heard
quote:
Ohio State is alledging The Brown Jug’s use of the “Buckeye Tears” trademark would damage the school’s brand by associating it with alcohol and potentially confuse consumers about the “Buckeyes” team name.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:10 pm to Corinthians420
Buckeye Tears sounds delicious
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:17 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
I kind of like the name of this drink.
I don't see how anyone over the age of 6 wouldn't be ok with this. Literally all over Ohio they yell F Michigan so how would that not sully the entire state of Michigan?
I don't know if it's soft as much as just stupid
I don't see how anyone over the age of 6 wouldn't be ok with this. Literally all over Ohio they yell F Michigan so how would that not sully the entire state of Michigan?
I don't know if it's soft as much as just stupid
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:19 pm to Buckeye06
Copyright infringement lawsuits and most cease and desist letters are very stupid.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:20 pm to KosmoCramer
For sure. This one seems kinda harmless
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:21 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
What a bunch of soft as Charmin pussies
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:23 pm to Lexis Dad
Ohio Soft University strikes again
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:23 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
I thought it was going to be over naming a drink "THE"
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:25 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
Remember when they said Marvin Harrison jr was better than Malik Nabers and Brian Thomas Jr? Hahahahaha lolololololol what a bunch of losers
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:25 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
quote:
and potentially confuse consumers about the “Buckeyes” team name.
Tears?
I know they have to use this argument because its one of the few you have in trademark law (‘likelihood of confusion’ ) but that's just pathetically funny.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:29 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Copyright infringement lawsuits and most cease and desist letters are very stupid.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:32 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
This is dumb, and will lose, but is what they have to do to continue enforcing their copyright in more legitimate circumstances.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:35 pm to Buckeye06
You know how to get back at Michigan fans? Not a frivolous lawsuit. Just invent a drink called "Wolverine Tears." Done.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:39 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
This is something that Texas would pull.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:51 pm to Shanks A Lot
quote:
they
they being the voters for best receiver in the country? They voted MHjr as the best receiver that year
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:22 pm to KosmoCramer
Based on the excerpt, this is neither a cease and desist letter nor a copyright infringement action. Its not even a "lawsuit". Its an opposition proceeding at the USPTO. After the trademark office reviews the application and publishes it, the public can file an opposition based on any harm it may encounter if the mark is registered. All the action takes place at the USPTO.
Proceeding
Their impetus is likely more than just protecting their mark. Indeed, if the bar just launched the drink, they may not have even taken action. In this case, absent OSU action, the Michigan bar would have a registered US trademark in Class 32 for beer and 33 for other alcoholic drinks. (Between 32 and 33, it covers most all beverages) OSU has a registered trademark for "Buckeyes" but only in classes 11,14, 16,18, 20, 21, 24, 25 and 28.
Thus, if OSU ever has a "Buckeye Water" or "Buckeye Coolata"; there is an argument its infringing because of the dominant term "Buckeye" and the bar's seniority of usage in the class with a presumption of validity due to their registration
Proceeding
Their impetus is likely more than just protecting their mark. Indeed, if the bar just launched the drink, they may not have even taken action. In this case, absent OSU action, the Michigan bar would have a registered US trademark in Class 32 for beer and 33 for other alcoholic drinks. (Between 32 and 33, it covers most all beverages) OSU has a registered trademark for "Buckeyes" but only in classes 11,14, 16,18, 20, 21, 24, 25 and 28.
Thus, if OSU ever has a "Buckeye Water" or "Buckeye Coolata"; there is an argument its infringing because of the dominant term "Buckeye" and the bar's seniority of usage in the class with a presumption of validity due to their registration
Posted on 9/4/25 at 3:27 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
The buckeye is a nut/seed that grows on a tree. This has nothing to do with football and shouldn’t be claimed or owned by anyone. This is ridiculous and makes these people look like texas fans level of pansy.
Grow a sack.
Grow a sack.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 3:32 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
Didn't OSU just ban like two or three people from attending their games because they were butthurt over something? And now this? Why are they all of a sudden doing all this pussy shite? Seems strange for it to all just start happening back to back like this.
Or am I thinking of a different university?
Or am I thinking of a different university?
Popular
Back to top


16








