- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LA Supreme Court shut down Coach O's request for rehearing.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:50 pm
Rosy Finch Baws finna get back in business.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:51 pm to arseinclarse
I don't think it's any coincidence that he was on PMT recently
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:51 pm to arseinclarse
this was not in The Binder
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:52 pm to arseinclarse
CrTate fired coach o because he voted for Trump
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:53 pm to arseinclarse
He was a part of the greatest college football season in history. For that I wish him well and will not disparage him.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:54 pm to arseinclarse
Coach O to Northwestern St.!
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:54 pm to arseinclarse
This is why all of a sudden he is searching for a new job
Ole lady got him good
Ole lady got him good
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:54 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
LA Supreme Court shut down Coach O's request for rehearing.
I assume this was about the shite with his ex-wife and his earnings and all that?
I don't know all the details about it, but the little I know seems like he's kinda getting fricked, no? What was their reasoning for denying?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:00 pm to arseinclarse
Kinda surprised mainly just because a lot of family law attorneys have remarked what a horrible precedent the ruling sets.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:04 pm to arseinclarse
Dumbass signed his new contract right before filing for divorce.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:08 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
I don't know all the details about it, but the little I know seems like he's kinda getting fricked, no? What was their reasoning for denying?
The rehearing being denied just means they support the decision and won't revisit it.
I haven't read the case, but I think it's due to the contract being signed prior to filing for divorce. His attorneys argued the buyout was similar to severance, and her attorneys argued it was a buyout of a contract she was owed half of.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:09 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Coach O to Northwestern St.!
Bama looking for a new Coach.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Dumbass dumped his wife to bang whores
And he timed the dumping of the wife very poorly
Tough to feel too bad for him
And he timed the dumping of the wife very poorly
Tough to feel too bad for him
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:13 pm to Cosmo
He’s always been trashy and dumb. His handling of the contract/divorce is hardly shocking.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:16 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Dumbass signed his new contract right before filing for divorce.
apparently tried to change the start date too
quote:
after the Binding Terms had been approved by LSU and Ed, a surreptitious request was made to LSU by Ed’s agent on his behalf. The agent sought a change to a major provision of the Binding Contract. He wanted the effective date of an already executed contract changed. He asked to change the true effective date of January 14, 2020 to a new date, April 23, 2020.
In this writer’s opinion this was an audacious, nearly fraudulent attempt to move the effective contract date away from that which had been created and existed during the community property regime. As Ed was already working under the new contract this made no sense, except for one major upheaval. A “new start date”would have placed the contract provisions into the time frame of the separate property regime of Ed.
This was an attempt to convert community property into separate property. Had this been accomplished, the financial security provided to bothEd and Kelly via the “termination without cause”provision in the community property contract would have been converted to the benefit of only Ed as the sole owner, not the owner of an undivided one-half interest
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:17 pm to arseinclarse
Community property is supposed to end the day someone files for divorce. This is garbage.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:20 pm to andwesway
quote:
Community property is supposed to end the day someone files for divorce.
He signed the new contract before he filed for divorce.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:21 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
apparently tried to change the start date too
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:23 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:tDerek in the mud.
apparently tried to change the start date too
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:24 pm to Mo Jeaux
I imagine whomever was advising him in early 2020 is very happy about the 3 year preemptive period on malpractice 
Popular
Back to top


10










