- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How much better off we would all be if the South had been permitted to secede
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:18 pm
Slavery was on the way out in the west, and everyone knows that. The longer term consequences have been that there is effectively no check on the powers of the federal government; the states are servile to the feds now, an inversion of how this country came to be. The atrocities and perversions of the progressive era (early 20th century to present) could have been turned back.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:25 pm to DyeHardDylan
Absolutely not.
Great Britain wanted to Balkanize the US, to keep us under their thumb.
The years after the war were some of the most prosperous and free of any human civilization.
Maybe not for indigenous peoples.
Great Britain wanted to Balkanize the US, to keep us under their thumb.
The years after the war were some of the most prosperous and free of any human civilization.
Maybe not for indigenous peoples.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:26 pm to DyeHardDylan
We'd have the same problems, only magnified b/c there wouldn't have been as big a Northern migration
MS would probably be majority black now
MS would probably be majority black now
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:27 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Slavery was on the way out in the west, and everyone knows that.
the confederates didn’t seem to think so
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:39 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
How much better off we would all be if the South had been permitted to secede
I wonder if we'd be a member of the Commonwealth of Nations given our past status as a colony and the heavy Anglophilia in places like Virginia, South Carolina and Georgia. 90 years separate SC's secession and the London Declaration, which allowed republics to join the Commonwealth.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:42 pm to DyeHardDylan
South would fall way behind due to focus on agriculture.
Blacks would have heavily outnumbered whites at some point. That would be a big problem.
Mississippi, for example, was majority black til 30s
South had small middle class, didnt invest in public facilities.
Blacks would have heavily outnumbered whites at some point. That would be a big problem.
Mississippi, for example, was majority black til 30s
South had small middle class, didnt invest in public facilities.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:45 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:
Slavery was on the way out in the west, and everyone knows that. The longer term consequences have been that there is effectively no check on the powers of the federal government; the states are servile to the feds now, an inversion of how this country came to be. The atrocities and perversions of the progressive era (early 20th century to present) could have been turned back.
Slavery was definitely going to end regardless of the Civil War.
The question is do you think the cultural differences between the South and the North are so different there is no way to coexist as a nation? If so what are the cultural differences that make the North and South incompatible?
I live in the KC area and it's a true mix of Midwest and South but I would say the South has deeper generational roots in Missouri than the Midwest/North Yankees do.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:50 pm to DyeHardDylan
Had it played out like that, the black dysphoria from the Old South into the West would have made the Trail of Tears look like a walk in the park
And New Mexico Lobos would have more Nattys than bama and LSU combined, and Old Gold-rich California and the Mormons would have built a wall
the had the Chinese to expolit
And New Mexico Lobos would have more Nattys than bama and LSU combined, and Old Gold-rich California and the Mormons would have built a wall
the had the Chinese to expolit
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:51 pm to DyeHardDylan
The Civil War was the last best chance to stop a tyrannical federal government and it’s leader Gay Abe.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:53 pm to DyeHardDylan
I bleed red, white & battle flag, but the way things turned out was best for the citizens of this country as a whole.
A nation divided would not be as strong as a whole.
A nation divided would not be as strong as a whole.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:53 pm to Bass Tiger
Don't think y'all understand how much the planter class stifled economic development and education.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:53 pm to Bass Tiger
Missouri was the frontier of the Old South
Texas was the Mexico
Texas was the Mexico
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:54 pm to DyeHardDylan
More than likely America would look like Europe with 6-12 different countries
Posted on 8/6/25 at 8:54 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Had it played out like that, the black dysphoria from the Old South into the West would have made the Trail of Tears look like a walk in the park And New Mexico Lobos would have more Nattys than bama and LSU combined, and Old Gold-rich California and the Mormons would have built a wall the had the Chinese to expolit
That’s a bold statement
I can’t say that I disagree
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:07 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Missouri was the frontier of the Old South
Texas was the Mexico
The precursor to what would morph into the Civil War was being fought along the Missouri/Kansas border in the mid 1850's. In my opinion where the South really fricked up was allowing the North to flood Missouri with newly arrived German immigrants who were willing to fight for the North with the hopes of being rewarded for their sacrifice.
What used to be called Little Dixie (ran from KC along the Missouri River to just north of St Louis) was primarily settlers from the south farming hemp and some tobacco and they brought their slave labor with them to Missouri. When the Civil War ended a lot of those farmers in the Little Dixie region of Missouri lost everything. Now when you drive I-70 from KC to St Louis there is a large German ancestral influence in Little Dixie region, particularly in Central Missouri where the wine region is located.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:09 pm to DyeHardDylan
We wouldn't have been as far along as fast.
We would be WAY better off, now.
I agree. Slavery would have ended either way, without a doubt. And probably pretty quickly. Make no mistake, if the south had been allowed to peacefully secede, the north wouldnt have given up slavery either. Hard to compete with slave labor, but the west would have expunged it.
The centralized federal government would simply never have been as corrupt and advanced as it is now.
We can only imagine how great things would have been.
We would be WAY better off, now.
I agree. Slavery would have ended either way, without a doubt. And probably pretty quickly. Make no mistake, if the south had been allowed to peacefully secede, the north wouldnt have given up slavery either. Hard to compete with slave labor, but the west would have expunged it.
The centralized federal government would simply never have been as corrupt and advanced as it is now.
We can only imagine how great things would have been.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:12 pm to DyeHardDylan
We’d be infinitely worse. The United States would’ve been a whole Europe of countries.
With the power vacuum you’d undoubtedly see Japan and Germany as the two major superpowers in the world. The Soviet Union wouldn’t have been able to defeat the Nazis without the US lend lease program and the opening of a second front in France. There would’ve been no one to slow down Japan taking all of Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
Japan and Germany likely end up taking down the Soviet Union and dividing the territory.
With the power vacuum you’d undoubtedly see Japan and Germany as the two major superpowers in the world. The Soviet Union wouldn’t have been able to defeat the Nazis without the US lend lease program and the opening of a second front in France. There would’ve been no one to slow down Japan taking all of Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
Japan and Germany likely end up taking down the Soviet Union and dividing the territory.
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:56 pm to Stidham8
Doubt it. The north and the west would not have been shackled by a dirt poor, unindustrialized South. They could produce ships and armaments better than anyone but Germany at the time and would still outproduce them in WW2
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:59 pm to DyeHardDylan
I love this country. I do not agree.
Popular
Back to top

43








