- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lawyers of the OT, do y’all use AI?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:11 pm
Witnessed a lawyer get exposed this morning for her use of AI hallucination cases.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:13 pm to arseinclarse
Nah. But cat filters? frick yeah.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:19 pm to arseinclarse
Not for outward-facing stuff. Currently investigating options for inward-facing work product.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:19 pm to beerJeep
I promise I am not a cat.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:21 pm to arseinclarse
if youre using ai with out checking the sources, youre a dumbass and deserve the consequences. Need to treat it as a law clerk or first year associate ( or 1st year whatever your profession) and double check everything.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:22 pm to LazloHollyfeld
quote:
if youre using ai with out checking the sources, youre a dumbass and deserve the consequences. Need to treat it as a law clerk or first year associate ( or 1st year whatever your profession) and double check everything.
I heard a college football podcast cite AI for how far Louisiana Tech was from other Sun Belt school. It said Lafayette was 4 hours and Little Rock was 3.5
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:22 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
inward-facing work product
What aspects of the practice?
I’m keeping my eyes open on this side.
Not sure why anyone would use it to search for cases. I’ve put statutes in google sometimes just to copy the text, and I’ve notice the ai regurgitation is incorrect.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:26 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
Not sure why anyone would use it to search for cases. I’ve put statutes in google sometimes just to copy the text, and I’ve notice the ai regurgitation is incorrect.
Commercial AI sucks in my experience as of today. Maybe it’ll get better quickly, but as of now it’s just an aggregator of what’s living on the internet. 75% of which is wrong
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:27 pm to arseinclarse
Yes, Vincent AI is pretty good for summarizing contracts and comparing revisions. It’s the only AI platform that we’re allowed to use with proprietary documents.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:27 pm to arseinclarse
Sometimes. But as a stepping off point only. Its conclusions in my area of law are wrong over half the time and will change if I slightly change the prompt. Highly unreliable.
Crazy people do stuff like cite cases with it.
Crazy people do stuff like cite cases with it.
This post was edited on 7/31/25 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:27 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Commercial AI sucks in my experience as of today. Maybe it’ll get better quickly, but as of now it’s just an aggregator of what’s living on the internet. 75% of which is wrong
This has been my experience too.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:28 pm to arseinclarse
Medical chronologies and summaries
Medical bill accumulation
Answering and propounding discovery
Demands and other pleadings that don’t involve legal argument (witness and exhibit lists, Rule 26a2c reports, etc.)
Medical bill accumulation
Answering and propounding discovery
Demands and other pleadings that don’t involve legal argument (witness and exhibit lists, Rule 26a2c reports, etc.)
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:32 pm to arseinclarse
Yes, but mostly as a first step in contract review and we create our own playbooks from which the data is pulled, so it's not using random shite it finds on the internet.
This post was edited on 7/31/25 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:36 pm to Sl0thstronautEsq
We do have some machine learning and OCR “ai” that we use that works pretty well, but that’s not really ai, they just put that buzzword moniker on any technology now
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:38 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
Lawyers of the OT, do y’all use AI?
I do but not for research.
Broke a Lexis rep's heart yesterday explaining why.
I also have an AI addendum for my contracts, for ethical reasons.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:sure you did.
Broke a Lexis rep's heart yesterday explaining why.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Broke a Lexis rep's heart yesterday explaining why.
Lexis doesn’t give a frick about your single user license
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Broke a Lexis rep's heart yesterday explaining why.
He was probably tired of listening to you and perhaps you made him constipated.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 6:58 pm to arseinclarse
Idiots are getting burned around the country for citing cases in their briefs that don't even exist!
Imagine how much fun you'd have looking at case that sounds bad for you and finding out there is no such case!
Imagine how much fun you'd have looking at case that sounds bad for you and finding out there is no such case!
Posted on 7/31/25 at 7:05 pm to arseinclarse
Had some colleagues in a big firm just get publicly dressed down and sanctioned by a federal judge for including AI hallucinations in a motion. Good attorneys. At least one of which is a really good dude. Terrible and careless mistake you would never have thought this attorney would make.
Popular
Back to top


30











