- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CA Senate Passes Bill Allowing LA to Buy Fire Ravaged Lots to Build Low Income Housing
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:26 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:26 am
They're calling it the Oprah Bill - "you get a home, you get a home."
It's a complete land grab - now we know why the reservoirs were empty.
Pacific Palisades is screwed - Million dollar homes next to section 8.
Paying taxes to build projects next door to your house.
It's a complete land grab - now we know why the reservoirs were empty.
Pacific Palisades is screwed - Million dollar homes next to section 8.
quote:
Gov. Gavin Newsom announced the allocation of $101 million in taxpayer funds for “multifamily low-income housing development” on lots that were ravaged by the deadly Palisades and Eaton wildfires.
Paying taxes to build projects next door to your house.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:27 am to Shexter
I’m poor. I’m moving to California for some cheap beachfront property.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:28 am to Shexter
Shocked face, tell us again how this wasn’t done on purpose
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:30 am to Shexter
quote:
Pacific Palisades is screwed - Million dollar homes next to section 8.
Might just be a massive "red pill" moment.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:33 am to Shexter
but...don't the owners HAVE to agree to sell?? Yall make it sound like they are just taking peoples property.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:33 am to LSU-MNCBABY
This happens during all natural disasters
Majority never notice. Many cannot afford to rebuild, so they sell at low price and investors take a huge dump in the area, after buying that property up, with tax credits to boot
Majority never notice. Many cannot afford to rebuild, so they sell at low price and investors take a huge dump in the area, after buying that property up, with tax credits to boot
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:34 am to bad93ex
quote:
Might just be a massive "red pill" moment
It won’t be. These are the same people that say gender isn’t real. They’ll believe whatever they’re told to believe.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:35 am to sidewalkside
quote:
but...don't the owners HAVE to agree to sell?? Yall make it sound like they are just taking peoples property.
Have you noticed all the red tape the owners are having to go through to even clean their property of debris? Imagine how much worse it will be when it's time to get permits, let alone actually start building.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:35 am to Shexter
Good, turn the whole thing into one, big stinking ghetto.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:39 am to Shexter
Again, remind me about all those great things about living in California.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:40 am to High C
quote:
Good, turn the whole thing into one, big stinking ghetto.
Mass deportations didn't leave any Mexicans to fill those ghettos.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:40 am to Kracka
quote:
so de-gentrification?
That's a good term.
A lot of the homes there were old and grandfathered in with respect to all of the onerous (and costly) regulations that were enacted over the decades. Many of the owners simply can't afford to rebuild new homes there. In many cases, their only options for relief will be to sell to developers (or the county/city).
It's easy to sit in your isolated high end neighborhood and demand "low income housing"...in someone else's neighborhood. But I suspect it will be a different story for those folks with the threat of it showing up next door.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:41 am to HeadCall
Those beachfront lots will never be reconstructed. You can bet on that
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:46 am to sidewalkside
quote:
but...don't the owners HAVE to agree to sell?? Yall make it sound like they are just taking peoples property.
It's hilarious that you've never heard about Imminent Domain.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:46 am to Shexter
And that guy wants to be our president.

Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:49 am to Shexter
Anyone ever wonder how the trees dont burn/die?
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:49 am to Shexter
They shouldn't rebuild the Palisades period. They're only setting it up to burn again. Malibu, too.
ETA: And if they insist on rebuilding, the population density should be cut in half to provide for actual defensible space. If they build it back just like it was, we will be doing this again......maybe in our own lifetimes. Those areas of Malibu and the Palisades face serious fire to some degree once a decade on average.
ETA: And if they insist on rebuilding, the population density should be cut in half to provide for actual defensible space. If they build it back just like it was, we will be doing this again......maybe in our own lifetimes. Those areas of Malibu and the Palisades face serious fire to some degree once a decade on average.
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 11:01 am
Posted on 7/16/25 at 10:59 am to PureBlood
quote:
Anyone ever wonder how the trees dont burn/die?
Trees native to the Chaparral are accustomed to fast burning fire. Historically, the Chaparral doesn't burn very often (traditionally it has fire intervals of 30+ years). That allows what tree species are native in the ecosystem to grow larger and more resistant to killing fire. When you run fire through that area consistently, as when humans showed up and began starting fires everywhere, it keeps the Chaparral young, more full of fast growing scrub and younger, less fire resistant trees. Humans also brought to the equation non-native plants and grasses that can grow faster, and subsequently die earlier in drought conditions. You wind up with brown, dead standing non-native grasses that are rocket fuel for wildfire on any landscape.
Generally speaking, native trees on any landscape are adequately adapted to survive whatever fire regime is native to that ecosystem.
Posted on 7/16/25 at 11:08 am to Shexter
Good they need to experience this and other reforms.
Popular
Back to top

19









