Started By
Message

TexAgs Hit With Patent Infringement Suit

Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:07 am
Posted by Hou_Lawyer
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2019
2162 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:07 am
This is a first that I’m aware of - TexAgs was just sued in SDTX for patent infringement. Plaintiff’s attorney is well known to represent trolls for a quick settlement (I.e low six figures). Pretty bad to go after a message board.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464773 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:08 am to
I thought the EDTX had the rocket docket

What's the patent? Is this like the guy who tried to sue podcasts b/c he said he patented the concept 10 years ago? Is this a patent on message boards or something more technical?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
175413 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:10 am to
When do we start a Tigerdroppings posters union. Negotiations for unbannings, salaries for clicks.
Posted by Hou_Lawyer
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2019
2162 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:13 am to
EDTX does but he can’t hold venue there.

Patent relates to authenticating a webpage - basic stuff. He’s sued on the patent for various types of defendants (banks, website operators and even a pickleball company)

Not the same guy.

Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72607 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:20 am to
It’s pretty self-explanatory-

TexAgs is being sued because they are using a variety of this gif to attract subscribers:

Posted by msap9020
Texas
Member since Feb 2015
2087 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:24 am to
Seriously though Hou-Lawyer what are the high points/real basis of the suit?
Posted by Hou_Lawyer
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2019
2162 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Seriously though Hou-Lawyer what are the high points/real basis of the suit?


These types of suits are usually not based on any legitimate basis. The gameplan for this attorney is the exact same in all of these suits: sue a ton of companies and try to settle early for $20-$50k a pop. If a company wants to challenge the patent or make a non-infringement argument, it’s going to cost at least $100k to hire a decent firm to defend and try and knock the patent out early. Most GCs don’t want to risk that so they’ll look for a quick out.

Plaintiff’s attorney doesn’t want to put the patent at risk either , so an early settlement is a win-win but it sucks for smaller companies where $25-$50k isn’t chump change.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
21745 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:37 am to
quote:

The gameplan for this attorney is the exact same in all of these suits: sue a ton of companies and try to settle early for $20-$50k a pop. If a company wants to challenge the patent or make a non-infringement argument, it’s going to cost at least $100k to hire a decent firm to defend and try and knock the patent out early.


We should throw these attorneys and their clients into a volcano
Posted by Squedunk
Texas Hill Country
Member since Jun 2008
802 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:43 am to
quote:

We should throw these attorneys and their clients into a volcano

Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
13014 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 7:49 am to
quote:

After more than a year of litigation, podcaster and comedian Adam Carolla has reached a cease-fire with the well-known "patent troll" claiming to hold a patent that covers podcasting.

Carolla was sued for patent infringement in January 2013. He responded by fighting back, raising almost $500,000 in a crowd-funded campaign. The parties had a trial set for next month in East Texas.
(2014)

I completely forgot that Carolla "lost" in the settlement.
Posted by msap9020
Texas
Member since Feb 2015
2087 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:07 am to
Apologies for the continued "dumb" questions but I'm really asking about their grounds for the suit. Is it the branding or something else?
Posted by 214
United States of America
Member since Mar 2025
5342 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:10 am to
Go on PACER, pay the $0.10 a page to download the original petition, read it, and report back.
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
32609 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:13 am to
Patent infringement?

Details?
Posted by Hou_Lawyer
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2019
2162 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Apologies for the continued "dumb" questions but I'm really asking about their grounds for the suit. Is it the branding or something else?


Operation of a website. Nowadays, the plaintiff will attach claim charts to the Complaint which shows the infringement proof. Don’t have those in front of me.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17331 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:19 am to
Rabicoff law…hehe
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26494 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:21 am to
Definitely curious to know what this is about.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464773 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:25 am to
Chicken if I didn't have court at 9 I would send it to you.

If I'm far back in line, I will look it up on my laptop while I wait
Posted by 214
United States of America
Member since Mar 2025
5342 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:27 am to
Given it's a patent suit, I presume the basis for the filing is quite technical and difficult for a layperson, in the technical sense, to decipher and/or summarize succinctly.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26494 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:28 am to
Thank you.

Need to make sure Dhillip and his team are on the up and up
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36126 posts
Posted on 6/24/25 at 8:29 am to
quote:

you. Need to make sure Dhillip and his team are on the up and up


You’re going to get what you pay for with SFP
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram