- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ram announces 10-year, 100K-mile powertrain warranty on new vehicles
Posted on 6/18/25 at 7:31 am
Posted on 6/18/25 at 7:31 am
quote:
The powertrain warranty, which will apply to the original owner of 2026 and later model years of Ram vehicles, is not bumper-to-bumper. It covers the engine, transmission, transfer case, driveshafts, differentials, and axles of the vehicle.
LINK
This almost makes me want to trade in my 2021 Ram that has had zero problems! This warranty plus bringing back the HEMI will probably be of interest to my fellow OB baws.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 7:36 am to NewIberiaHaircut
If it covers 1 tons, I'll be getting one. That's solid.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 7:41 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
At a private media event on June 3, Kuniskis originally stated that the brand planned to offer the warranty only for its light-duty pickups. Since the preview event, Ram has decided to go all in on offering the warranty for all of its vehicles, except for those sold in fleets.
From that article. I'd assume all Ram's not sold as fleet will receive the warranty.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 7:52 am to NewIberiaHaircut
The diesels already have a 100k mile powertrain warranty but it's only for 4 years IIRC. The gassers far less.
They need to nut up and extend the coverage to the exhaust system as well for the diesel. It pisses me off that we have to have that stuff but the warranty coverage on it is shite.
They need to nut up and extend the coverage to the exhaust system as well for the diesel. It pisses me off that we have to have that stuff but the warranty coverage on it is shite.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 7:55 am to NewIberiaHaircut
Be great if this pushes other manus to follow suite.
Hopefully warranty service doesn't mean sitting at a dealership for 6months waiting on a backordered part though .
Hopefully warranty service doesn't mean sitting at a dealership for 6months waiting on a backordered part though .
Posted on 6/18/25 at 8:39 am to NewIberiaHaircut
quote:I was going to keep my 2024 for a long time and break my 4 year cycle. Now, not so sure.
This almost makes me want to trade in my 2021 Ram that has had zero problems!
Posted on 6/18/25 at 8:49 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Curious if they've resolved the grid heater bolt breaking off in the engine on 5th gens. The only way to eliminate that problem is a $1000 aftermarket intake from Banks, that doesn't seemingly offer much additional performance if your truck is otherwise stock.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 8:52 am to WhiskeyThrottle
They got rid of the grid heater and use glow plugs now.
They also went back to the CP4 fuel pump.....
My next one will be a gas burner.
They also went back to the CP4 fuel pump.....
My next one will be a gas burner.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:04 am to NewIberiaHaircut
Does that mean it covers the manifold and ejectors because that’s what went wrong with my ram, my customers ram and my boss’s. You can also throw in the heater core. All of that by 130,000 miles.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:09 am to NewIberiaHaircut
Well damn, I may have to get a turboV6 now.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 9:40 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
My next one will be a gas burner.
Hard to beat the 3/4 ton diesel MPG for long highway trips...
But Ford's big gasses looks pretty reliable.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:20 am to N2cars
quote:
Ford's big gasses looks pretty reliable.
Theyre all pretty good right now. I'd buy any of them.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:10 am to WhiskeyThrottle
I welded a bung into my intake horn and installed the coil heater that Chevrolet uses. This allowed me to delete my grid heater
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:12 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I highly doubt this included 3/4 and 1 ton trucks.
I watched a video a while back mentioning the federal govt may require truck manufacturers to warranty emissions systems for 250,000 miles.
I watched a video a while back mentioning the federal govt may require truck manufacturers to warranty emissions systems for 250,000 miles.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:17 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
the federal govt may require truck manufacturers to warranty emissions systems for 250,000 miles
Well if you want to curb deleting, this is how you would accomplish that. Would be a massive cost increase to the end customer though.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:23 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
That was the point of the video. I think it was Stellantis CEO basically saying they project on average having to replace the emissions systems twice over a period of 250,000 miles. So they ultimately would put that cost in the price of the truck.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:38 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
ultimately would put that cost in the price of the truck.
Every truck.
There just needs to be a slight retooling of the regulations and the hardware and it'd be a million times better than it is now. It'd be super simple to do. You'll still have the diesel smoke bros who are going to want to delete everything no matter what but the stuff is reliable now. It just needs to be less nanny when it comes to faults, repairs, etc.
quote:
Stellantis CEO basically saying they project on average having to replace the emissions systems twice over a period of 250,000 miles
That's got to be inaccurate.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 12:05 pm to GREENHEAD22
quote:
Well damn, I may have to get a turboV6 now.
It’s not a V6!
Posted on 6/18/25 at 12:34 pm to NewIberiaHaircut
Ahh, straight 6. Still a small 6 cylinder motor with turbos that will be used to pull and haul. Doesn't scream reliability imo.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 12:51 pm to GREENHEAD22
Longevity TBD, but on paper the concept itself is very good. If it turns out to be a turd it won't be because of the overall architecture of the engine, it'll be because they filled it with crap parts or assembly practices.
Smaller displacement and turbochargers on light duty engines is how they should all be made IMO. Better fuel mileage the 95+% of its life that it isn't towing or hauling anything, and enough juice to do the 5% towing and hauling.
It's a very sensible way to both make the needed torque and hit the fuel economy numbers. The only reason every engine hasn't been made that way forever is that it costs more than a naturally aspirated engine. In the case of a gasoline turbocharged engine, dramatically more than NA.
Smaller displacement and turbochargers on light duty engines is how they should all be made IMO. Better fuel mileage the 95+% of its life that it isn't towing or hauling anything, and enough juice to do the 5% towing and hauling.
It's a very sensible way to both make the needed torque and hit the fuel economy numbers. The only reason every engine hasn't been made that way forever is that it costs more than a naturally aspirated engine. In the case of a gasoline turbocharged engine, dramatically more than NA.
Popular
Back to top


13






