- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
9
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:14 pm to 2024GoTigas
you need a bracket on your first part of the link.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:17 pm to 2024GoTigas
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:18 pm to 2024GoTigas
Of course
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:20 pm to 2024GoTigas
The government will appeal by the deadline on Friday morning. He's not being released.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:21 pm to 2024GoTigas
With these kind of details, OP should be a journalist, working for CNN. Thanks, was engaging - would read this empty thread again.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:29 pm to 2024GoTigas
There has been a lot of discussion of this case on this board. I figured the District Court would do this.
My questions are:
- does the district court ruling limit the unconstitutionality of the law in question only as it is applied to green card holders, or also to people here on visas?
- when you get a green card through marriage does the "provisional" status (or whatever legal/technical term is used) only apply to the marriage itself? In other words, the green card is provisional only to the extent that the government is waiting to see if the marriage is a sham or not. Otherwise all protections/rights of a green card holder apply.
- Finally - what is the basis for revoking a green card? Only violent felony convictions? Seems weird that person can be here on a green card and engage in activities the government deems as adverse to U.S. interests but there is nothing the government can do.
My questions are:
- does the district court ruling limit the unconstitutionality of the law in question only as it is applied to green card holders, or also to people here on visas?
- when you get a green card through marriage does the "provisional" status (or whatever legal/technical term is used) only apply to the marriage itself? In other words, the green card is provisional only to the extent that the government is waiting to see if the marriage is a sham or not. Otherwise all protections/rights of a green card holder apply.
- Finally - what is the basis for revoking a green card? Only violent felony convictions? Seems weird that person can be here on a green card and engage in activities the government deems as adverse to U.S. interests but there is nothing the government can do.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:30 pm to 2024GoTigas
You could, ya know......quote some of those articles. That would help.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
You could, ya know......quote some of those articles. That would help.
This is the khalil case. Theguy who led the pro-Palestine/anti-Israel protests at Columbia. he was here on a student visa, got married to citizen and got a green card in October. U.S. detained him for removal on the basis of Congressionally passed statute that he was expressing ideas/speech that were adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests. Immigration Court ruled in favor of government, but he appealed to a Jersey or NY District Court (not sure which one) and they have ruled the statute unconstitutional at least as applied to green card holders.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 6:40 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
A federal judge sided with Mahmoud Khalil, an anti-Israel ringleader detained by the Trump administration, blocking the government from continuing to hold him on "foreign policy" grounds.
Or you could take 2 mins to read the article in its entirety.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:24 pm to 2024GoTigas
Too bad there is not an accident that just happens....................
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:48 pm to 2024GoTigas
Didn’t open link, but good. We should all support Green Card aka Permanent Residents. They came in the right way and are definitely more American than half of this country.
ETA: just read the article and nevermind. Thought this post was about green cards vs illegals or something. lol. frick that guy.
ETA: just read the article and nevermind. Thought this post was about green cards vs illegals or something. lol. frick that guy.
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:50 pm to SoFlaGuy
quote:
Didn’t open link, but good. We should all support Green Card aka Permanent Residents. They came in the right way and are definitely more American than half of this country.
horse shite
Are you an idiot or just shitposting?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:59 pm to RohanGonzales
Neither. Curious to hear why it’s horseshite.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 8:00 pm to JimEverett
interesting tidbit about the judge from wiki
He has taught courses at Columbia Law School
He has taught courses at Columbia Law School
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News