Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Life insurance: any real need in late 50s?

Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:19 am
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25989 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:19 am
I have a permanent 25k of life insurance at no cost to me. I currently carry over 600k in term. Half of it expires next year. The other is thru work and goes away when I am no longer employed there (it’s pretty darn cheap). No minor children. Wife would get my pension (60k a year - cola adjusted each year) for life. She would also get whatever is left in retirement accounts, emergency fund, etc. I just don’t see a need for it, except the cheap work policy and similar at any other job I might get going forward. House is paid off next year. Anyone else just view themselves as “self insured” when their kids became adults?
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
23519 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

House is paid off next year. Anyone else just view themselves as “self insured” when their kids became adults?


This would be the normal thought outside of the insurance salesman office, yes.

Life insurance is insurance, its meant to cover things you can't afford. So its really your wife having insurance on you if she can't afford to lose you. Or you have life insurance on your self for your kids.

Its not horribly expensive to keep low end term policies of $250k or so either, just for the piece of mind and so your wife can go on an extra nice vacation if you die.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25135 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 10:47 am to
Self-insured is a thing, no reason to carry it if you do not need it. With house paid off and kids gone, it just comes down to how much you want to leave your spouse if you go first.

I have a policy through work (free) and personal, will probably have neither by age 60.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39939 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:34 am to
Kind of depends on what you want out of it. There isn't a right or wrong answer here. As mentioned, you can absolutely be self insured. If retirement is already pretty much taken care of, house as you said, etc. You have the permanent policy for immediate funeral expenses and such.

Some out there want to do some legacy building, additional money for family just to make sure there are no issues later in retirement if something were to happen prematurely and they weren't there, etc. I can guarantee I'd personally never feel bad leaving my wife more than she needed .

So, short answer, yes there are real reasons for keeping some. Also, there are real reason not to keep any additional, just depends on your situation. Being self-insured is absolutely a possibility.
This post was edited on 6/10/25 at 11:36 am
Posted by DrrTiger
Gulf of America
Member since Nov 2023
2392 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:51 am to
We have term life insurance policies that expire at age 60. By then, the plan is to no longer be working and we’ll have access to retirement funds without penalty. They’ll have served their purpose at that point.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14477 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:52 am to
Just need to sit down with your wife and run the numbers. they key is making the money last for her in the event of an early death. You dont want her to struggle because you are gone. By the time you hit your 50s, your house should be nearly paid off or completely paid off, so a mortgage is covered.

at a minimum you want funeral expenses covered (easily with the $25k policy) how many years does your wife have till 65 for Medicare/SS. can she make it there without financial burden? if not then you need some kind of coverage to fill the gap.

But it comes down to what kind of risk to you want to cover, and since the riskis all held by her, she needs to understand what the worst case scenario can be when deciding.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
19390 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 11:53 am to
A lot of people look at it like “I’ve paid in this long it would be a waste not to keep it” but the fact is if you’ve outlived the need for it should you die, congrats…you won. The cost over those years was to protect your family…so it did it’s job.

Unless you’re worried about loss of income to your family, estate taxes, burial costs or having to buy out a business or shared property there’s really not much use in it.

If you don’t expect to die in the next few years I’d cash it out or end it.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16136 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 12:10 pm to
I view life insurance as an estate planning tool and cost effective way to leave something for my heirs.

Posted by TX_Tiger23
Seabrook, Texas
Member since Aug 2013
109 posts
Posted on 6/10/25 at 5:32 pm to
I’m licensed to sell insurance, I’ve convinced more people to give up their life insurance than I’ve sold…including my parents. Unless you have estate tax issues, at retirement, if you have no debt there’s not much reason to carry any policy.

Also, even though the work policy is “pretty darn cheap” it can still cost more than outside term insurance. Of course, every situation is different but just a few things to think about.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30945 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Also, even though the work policy is “pretty darn cheap” it can still cost more than outside term insurance.


Outside term is usually not cheaper than a Voluntary Term life policy. It's "pretty darn cheap" for a reason.
Posted by vistajay
Member since Oct 2012
2823 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:41 am to
I'm late 50s and have a $1 million term that will end when I am 65. I still have a kid at an expensive college and have a mortgage. I don't want my wife to have to sell the house (or worry about it), if something happens to me soon. I won't get a new policy at 65, as by then we'll be retired or almost retired with no dependents and little debt.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49505 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 2:26 pm to
If you're debt free and don't have young children or any other dependents that you're taking care of, and you have assets for your wife to bury you with, you really have no need for life insurance.

And I'm an agent whose livelihood depends on selling life insurance, but not to people without a need.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram