- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Guess what Kagan said in the Mexico v Smith & Wesson case for the 9-0 decision today...
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:04 pm
what you'll read below is "ammo" for the future AWB case that Kavanaugh talked about...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 12:23 am
8
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:05 pm to finchmeister08
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:15 pm to finchmeister08
I have no doubt this bitch will completely forget this line if they actually take up an "assault weapons" case
Watch
Just watch
Watch
Just watch
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:32 pm to finchmeister08
I can’t believe it was 9-0
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:41 pm to deltaland
quote:
I can’t believe it was 9-0
I'm really surprised that the wise diabetic torta didn't side with Mexico on this.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:50 pm to finchmeister08
Kagan is solid. By far the best of the three amigos on the bench.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 9:59 pm to finchmeister08
Somebody enlighten me, including SFP...
How does Kagan stating this 'breathe new life in the AWB'? Especially on the heels of Kavanaugh basically saying the exact same thing in Maryland/RI punt?
Wouldn't being 'commonly owned' be a detriment to any AWB case(s)?
How does Kagan stating this 'breathe new life in the AWB'? Especially on the heels of Kavanaugh basically saying the exact same thing in Maryland/RI punt?
Wouldn't being 'commonly owned' be a detriment to any AWB case(s)?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:05 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
Kagan is solid. By far the best of the three amigos on the bench.
At this point, I’d almost trade Roberts, Barrett, and maybe Kavanaugh, each for another Kagan.
At least I have a pretty good idea that none of her votes are based principally on how she might be received at in the Beltway cocktail parties.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:06 pm to finchmeister08
Is it normal to cite NPR in a Supreme Court decision?
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:15 pm to deltaland
Right? I have been told incessantly that all 3 Trump appointees are worse than the next and we’ve lost the Court too.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 10:46 pm to deeprig9
quote:lol, I wondered that too.
Is it normal to cite NPR in a Supreme Court decision?
You would think some FBI background check and ATF data would be more along the lines of what the SCOTUS would choose to cite as part of the basis for a decision.
They'd flip their shite if Gorsuch cited Alex Jones.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 6:23 am to finchmeister08
It was a good ruling. I wonder why they turned down the chance to strike at AR bans just a few days ago? I know they said this was going to come up again and it seems like they will not support such bans but why wait?
They affirmed the 2nd is just like the 1st and other rights...that restrictions need to take the form of limitations that do less harm to the exercise of the right. It's a matter of time before we see most gun laws struck down. Good. A free people are only free when they have access to arms.
They affirmed the 2nd is just like the 1st and other rights...that restrictions need to take the form of limitations that do less harm to the exercise of the right. It's a matter of time before we see most gun laws struck down. Good. A free people are only free when they have access to arms.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:15 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
Kagan is solid. By far the best of the three amigos on the bench.
Being the tallest midget doesn't make you solid, it just makes you the tallest midget.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:17 am to finchmeister08
That statement about AR ownership is not “binding precedent” 
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:27 am to Barbados
quote:
have no doubt this bitch will completely forget this line if they actually take up an "assault weapons" case
Maybe, but Kagan is the most reasonable and smartest of the 3 loons.
Not to say she IS reasonable, just the most out of those 3 wackos.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:46 am to Indefatigable
quote:
That statement about AR ownership is not “binding precedent”
True but she can't backtrack now
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:54 am to Barbados
Maybe not. Remember that infamous Video that dropped here “Why the Right will win the coming Civil War”. The Dems addressed the situation and imported millions of hardened street fighters and even trained terrorists and Marxist ideologues. Hell, as things go south the Dems may subsidize ARs to the poor via DEI principles to protect themselves from the racist Nazis. Satan laughs all the way to the bank.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 7:59 am to Wtodd
quote:
True but she can't backtrack now
She won’t ever have to. She’ll vote to uphold a state or federal ban on them regardless of their common ownership, on other grounds.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News