- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WYDI? Updated 2025 Ford Expedition
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:23 pm
At the moment, General Motors has around 70% market share in the full sized SUV market. Ford has held steady with the Expedition/Navigator (both regular and extended length versions), while Jeep, Toyota, and Nissan remain "also rans". General Motors refreshed their Tahoe, Yukon, and Suburban models in 2024, which is being answered by Ford with an updated Expedition.
Ford's powertrain, platform, and chassis remains mostly the same - it still has the same 10 speed and turbo V6 as the prior model. Frustratingly Ford still does not offer the 5.0L V8 in the Expedition or the Powerboost setup from their pickups.
That said - the interior design, exterior styling, and infotainment/tech has been updated very well. The Expedition likely has the highest average transaction price of any Ford model - including the F-series given the number of lower margin fleet sales that Ford has with those trucks. The Expedition's MSRP will creep upward although not quite as high as the GMC Yukon. Expect to pay $65,000- $75,000 for the most common models, but higher end ones can be well over $80,000.
The big change that Ford is pimping is the lift gate in the back having a lower section with a tailgate.
The new interior screens look very nice - sort of similar to the new Nissan Armada, but more car-like.
Ford did add a new Tremor model to combat Toyota's TRD Off Road, Chevrolet's Z71, Nissan's Pro 4X, and GMC's AT4 trim levels. It's virtually impossible to get the best off road hardware in any of those models without the tacky black wheels, orange/red trim, and weird branding. But I'm glad they offer it even if it's more of a trim level than an option package.
What do you guys think about this one? Probably not worth $80,000 or so but it's a big money maker for Ford, their dealer network, and their service departments. It's common to see these sharing garage space with other domestic pickups.
I'd have preferred Ford keep it more simple and just make the Expedition look more like the excellent looking new F-150:
Having the V8 option and the hybrid option from the F-150 would have been very nice too. General Motors has no less than 3 different powertrain options in their models, including a diesel engine offering. Ford should have done more under the hood to give consumers more options. They aren't the market leaders here, but they are far, far ahead of the Toyota, Nissan, and Jeep products - they should be able to justify more powertrain options. The rumor is that even the Wagoneer will bring a V8 option back next year.
IMO the F-150's Powerboost is a home run. They should have offered that in the Expedition as an option.
Not sure if the split rear tailgate is a big selling point for me - it's a nice to have, but I would have preferred optional barn doors out back especially now that so many of these trucks have rear view cameras. I do like the tailgate setup though more than a standard liftgate, but I wish you could get the upper section painted like the rest of the car instead of that high gloss black plastic trim.
From an interior perspective, the Ford Expedition looks VERY nice but the interior styling is a little weird for me. The F-150 (especially the King Ranch) has a better looking setup, at least from my perspective. IMO Ford would have likely been even more successful had they just lifted that entire dash and door card setup from the F-150. I loathe the rotary knob gear selector - and that looks like that's what Ford did here. I mostly hate it because I think it's a safety hazard - the shift to D or R should be a different movement than the shift to N or P. Chrysler/Jeep/Ram have had some fatal accidents because of this, including one in my hometown where an elderly driver got P and R mixed up. It also looks like they put it on the center stack near other HVAC and radio knobs although it's a different size.
The two spoke steering wheel in the Ford is a little odd too, especially when the F-150 has a perfectly good steering wheel that they could use without literally reinventing the wheel.
From an interior perspective, the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban have a more traditional configuration that I prefer - especially the new electronic column shifter. The Yukon has a massive center screen that I'm not sure I like although it looks more pleasing to me than the Ford. The Toyota Sequoia has something more similar to the old Expedition and looks pretty dated now that the Ford has this new setup, but I really like the 1794 model.
They definitely seem to be going after a female audience with the Expedition with less truck-like interior, lower ride height, and the emphasis on more blingy details rather than more powertrain options. I'm sure it will be a sales success.
I think this is a nice alternative to the GM trucks and I can definitely see the updated Expedition fending off the Japanese competitors. Ford will likely maintain market share, but I don't see them threatening GM with this design and the lack a diesel or a V8 powertrain.
Competition is stiff:
The market leaders - Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban:
GMC Yukon
The brand new Nissan Armada (known as the Petrol overseas) is surprisingly good and well finished:
The dated looking Toyota Sequoia, which will be updated in 2027 with the Tundra:
Not sure I understand the point of the Sequoia. There are so many weird compromises with its design, and they are fundamental issues that a mild refresh can't really correct.
I'd have preferred Toyota just sell the LC300 series here instead. It's also compromised with interior space, but I'd have certainly preferred it to the Sequoia, the lame new Land Cruiser 250, or any of the domestic competitors.
Ford's powertrain, platform, and chassis remains mostly the same - it still has the same 10 speed and turbo V6 as the prior model. Frustratingly Ford still does not offer the 5.0L V8 in the Expedition or the Powerboost setup from their pickups.
That said - the interior design, exterior styling, and infotainment/tech has been updated very well. The Expedition likely has the highest average transaction price of any Ford model - including the F-series given the number of lower margin fleet sales that Ford has with those trucks. The Expedition's MSRP will creep upward although not quite as high as the GMC Yukon. Expect to pay $65,000- $75,000 for the most common models, but higher end ones can be well over $80,000.
The big change that Ford is pimping is the lift gate in the back having a lower section with a tailgate.
The new interior screens look very nice - sort of similar to the new Nissan Armada, but more car-like.



Ford did add a new Tremor model to combat Toyota's TRD Off Road, Chevrolet's Z71, Nissan's Pro 4X, and GMC's AT4 trim levels. It's virtually impossible to get the best off road hardware in any of those models without the tacky black wheels, orange/red trim, and weird branding. But I'm glad they offer it even if it's more of a trim level than an option package.
What do you guys think about this one? Probably not worth $80,000 or so but it's a big money maker for Ford, their dealer network, and their service departments. It's common to see these sharing garage space with other domestic pickups.
I'd have preferred Ford keep it more simple and just make the Expedition look more like the excellent looking new F-150:

Having the V8 option and the hybrid option from the F-150 would have been very nice too. General Motors has no less than 3 different powertrain options in their models, including a diesel engine offering. Ford should have done more under the hood to give consumers more options. They aren't the market leaders here, but they are far, far ahead of the Toyota, Nissan, and Jeep products - they should be able to justify more powertrain options. The rumor is that even the Wagoneer will bring a V8 option back next year.
IMO the F-150's Powerboost is a home run. They should have offered that in the Expedition as an option.
Not sure if the split rear tailgate is a big selling point for me - it's a nice to have, but I would have preferred optional barn doors out back especially now that so many of these trucks have rear view cameras. I do like the tailgate setup though more than a standard liftgate, but I wish you could get the upper section painted like the rest of the car instead of that high gloss black plastic trim.
From an interior perspective, the Ford Expedition looks VERY nice but the interior styling is a little weird for me. The F-150 (especially the King Ranch) has a better looking setup, at least from my perspective. IMO Ford would have likely been even more successful had they just lifted that entire dash and door card setup from the F-150. I loathe the rotary knob gear selector - and that looks like that's what Ford did here. I mostly hate it because I think it's a safety hazard - the shift to D or R should be a different movement than the shift to N or P. Chrysler/Jeep/Ram have had some fatal accidents because of this, including one in my hometown where an elderly driver got P and R mixed up. It also looks like they put it on the center stack near other HVAC and radio knobs although it's a different size.
The two spoke steering wheel in the Ford is a little odd too, especially when the F-150 has a perfectly good steering wheel that they could use without literally reinventing the wheel.
From an interior perspective, the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban have a more traditional configuration that I prefer - especially the new electronic column shifter. The Yukon has a massive center screen that I'm not sure I like although it looks more pleasing to me than the Ford. The Toyota Sequoia has something more similar to the old Expedition and looks pretty dated now that the Ford has this new setup, but I really like the 1794 model.
They definitely seem to be going after a female audience with the Expedition with less truck-like interior, lower ride height, and the emphasis on more blingy details rather than more powertrain options. I'm sure it will be a sales success.
I think this is a nice alternative to the GM trucks and I can definitely see the updated Expedition fending off the Japanese competitors. Ford will likely maintain market share, but I don't see them threatening GM with this design and the lack a diesel or a V8 powertrain.
Competition is stiff:
The market leaders - Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban:

GMC Yukon

The brand new Nissan Armada (known as the Petrol overseas) is surprisingly good and well finished:

The dated looking Toyota Sequoia, which will be updated in 2027 with the Tundra:

Not sure I understand the point of the Sequoia. There are so many weird compromises with its design, and they are fundamental issues that a mild refresh can't really correct.
I'd have preferred Toyota just sell the LC300 series here instead. It's also compromised with interior space, but I'd have certainly preferred it to the Sequoia, the lame new Land Cruiser 250, or any of the domestic competitors.
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:24 pm to goofball
quote:
Ford's powertrain, platform, and chassis remains mostly the same - it still has the same 10 speed and turbo V6 as the prior model. Frustratingly Ford still does not offer the 5.0L V8 in the Expedition or the Powerboost setup from their pickups.
Lost me right there.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:25 pm to goofball
The front is a blatant ripoff of the GMC Sierra
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:26 pm to goofball
I'd drive it but still would prefer my GMC Yukon XL, assuming the 6.2L doesn't grenade itself spontaneously.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:27 pm to goofball
That long awkward end of the Expedition is one of the goofiest things since the gay headlamps on Rivian. Looks like a hearse
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:30 pm to SirWinston
quote:
That long awkward end of the Expedition is one of the goofiest things
Yeah the front looks okay. The back looks stretched and tucked....like an aging woman with a bad facelift. I can't get past it. Black paint would mask it, but I don't buy black cars.
quote:
Looks like a hearse
Now that you mention it.....that thing looks like a hearse.
There is too much going on back there. This is a full sized SUV. Being slab sided and simple is a good thing if they can offer quality. They didn't need to give it weird styling.
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:33 pm to goofball
quote:
without the tacky black wheels
What?

quote:
The brand new Nissan Armada (known as the Petrol overseas) is surprisingly good and well finished:
Agreed. Saw one on the road the other day and it looked good. Looked at the Pro4x and it looks even better.
quote:
The dated looking Toyota Sequoia, which will be updated in 2027 with the Tundra:
Disagree here. Really like the Trd pro Sequoia.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:33 pm to goofball
quote:
The Expedition's MSRP will creep upward although not quite as high as the GMC Yukon. Expect to pay $65,000- $75,000 for the most common models, but higher end ones can be well over $80,000.

The 2025 GMC Yukon has a starting MSRP of $69,395 for the Elevation trim, while the top-of-the-line Denali Ultimate starts at $103,995.
Sounding like my dad, but I only paid $96,000 for my first house and that was 1,600 square feet.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:34 pm to goofball
quote:No.
The Expedition's MSRP will creep upward although not quite as high as the GMC Yukon. Expect to pay $65,000- $75,000 for the most common models, but higher end ones can be well over $80,000.
That vehicle is worth, maybe, half that.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:36 pm to H2O Tiger
quote:
I'd drive it but still would prefer my GMC Yukon XL, assuming the 6.2L doesn't grenade itself spontaneously.
On the plus side, GM quietly made changes to their production process to fix the issue around June of last year.
On the down side.....GM didn't start the recall process for the potentially problematic engines (made before June of last year) until about a month ago. Not a good look either way. Looks like they were trying to avoid dealing with customers that had issues outside of warranty.
The engine I'd get in the Yukon is probably the diesel, but I like the V8 options there a lot.
I don't know anything about the Nissan V6, but it looks really good on paper.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:36 pm to goofball
I only drive German made vehicles. Thanks.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:38 pm to Shexter
quote:These car prices are retarded and you have people who are paying it.
2025 GMC Yukon has a starting MSRP of $69,395 for the Elevation trim, while the top-of-the-line Denali Ultimate starts at $103,995.
Sounding like my dad, but I only paid $96,000 for my first house and that was 1,600 square feet.
In 2005, super cars we’re going for $100-200k.
A Galardo was going for $167k 20 years ago.
Now, people are paying $100k for a fricking expedition.
Americans are insane.
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:38 pm to TT9
Aint none of em as cool or practical as a gm 2500 express passenger
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:40 pm to goofball
I'd have preferred a more squared, boxy look.
It's an okay update. It is probably enough to keep the Ford faithful from rushing to GM, but I don't think it's going to draw a lot of new buyers in from other brands. That's frustrating because Ford has the parts and the budget to do exactly that.
It's an okay update. It is probably enough to keep the Ford faithful from rushing to GM, but I don't think it's going to draw a lot of new buyers in from other brands. That's frustrating because Ford has the parts and the budget to do exactly that.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:41 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I don’t fricking understand.
People act like these prices are just the normal way of things.
It is fricking insane.
In 2018, a Ford Expedition was half the price of what is listed in the OP.
People act like these prices are just the normal way of things.
It is fricking insane.

In 2018, a Ford Expedition was half the price of what is listed in the OP.
This post was edited on 6/5/25 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:44 pm to Scruffy
Me either dude.
But, you can finance a $150k bay boat for 20-30 years now and people are buying those about as fast as we can make em, and bringing them to a rigging shop and financing $30k of electronics for 5 years on top of that.
Nobody ever intends to pay any of this shite off I dont guess.
But, you can finance a $150k bay boat for 20-30 years now and people are buying those about as fast as we can make em, and bringing them to a rigging shop and financing $30k of electronics for 5 years on top of that.
Nobody ever intends to pay any of this shite off I dont guess.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:45 pm to goofball
The armada has come a long way. The former iteration of it had some seriously outdated, junk technology.
Posted on 6/5/25 at 12:51 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
But, you can finance a $150k bay boat for 20-30 years now and people are buying those about as fast as we can make em, and bringing them to a rigging shop and financing $30k of electronics for 5 years on top of that.
American perception is so fricked.
Replace “bay boat” with house and that is home financing 20 years ago.
Popular
Back to top
