- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Nuclear Lobby Fights Back as GOP Slashes Clean Energy Incentives
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:11 pm
quote:
Last week, Republican legislators caused an uproar in wind and solar circles by proposing what amounts to a decimation of subsidies for these industries—and EVs as well. But the lawmakers did not stop with wind and solar. They are cutting incentives for nuclear as well. The nuclear industry is up in arms. It has AI movers and shakers on its side.
Last Monday, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce proposed phasing out tax credits linked to climate policies stipulated in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. This, per the Committee, will raise some $6.5 billion. The House Ways and Means Committee also proposed phasing out various tax incentives, aiming to fuel the expansion of wind and solar energy, electric vehicles, and other transition technologies.
Naturally, wind and solar companies were less than happy to hear this, especially since they’d been lobbying legislators hard in the months since President Trump took office. The lobbying effort has focused on legislators representing districts that have been on the receiving end of IRA subsidies and on scare tactics about job losses and a worsened outlook for “American families”.
Nuclear has also joined the push against subsidy phaseout with its own lobbying effort. According to a Financial Times report from Sunday, the industry has been lobbying Congress to stop short of removing subsidies for new nuclear facilities, and it has been lobbying it hard. One nuclear tech firm, Oklo, linked financially to OpenAI’s Sam Altman, for instance, upped its spending on lobbying by 500% on the year to 424,000. Constellation Energy, Microsoft’s partner in Three Mile Island, spent more than $1.7 million on lobbying in the first quarter, a 17% annual increase, per the FT.
quote:
Data centers and artificial intelligence—this is what is driving the nuclear rush that has benefited from the IRA incentives that GOP legislators now want to remove, along with wind, solar, and EV subsidies. Artificial intelligence is pushing electricity demand higher, and the outlook for this demand is so unanimously bullish that the need for more generating capacity is taken for granted. The thing about nuclear is that it costs a pretty penny upfront, and it’s nice to have a part of that financial burden shouldered by a cooperative federal government.
quote:
The tax credits are also essential for large-scale new nuclear because of the price tag it tends to come with—and Republicans in the Senate know it.
This is the good news for the nuclear industry: Senate legislators who don’t mind slashing subsidies for wind and solar do mind slashing them for nuclear and some have already indicated the authors of the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” would have to make some changes if they want it to pass the upper house of Congress.
North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, for instance, has an idea of removing only the subsidies for wind and solar but not for nuclear.
quote:
Indeed, businesses relying on federal subsidies tend to get stuck in ruts. Look no further than wind and solar for evidence of this. These industries are a lot more active in the lobbying push right now because they know they will not survive for long without subsidies—and they have long forgotten how to compete on the free market. The nuclear industry, hopefully, has a better memory about that.
LINK
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:18 pm to ragincajun03
quote:Scruffy is ok with that.
North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, for instance, has an idea of removing only the subsidies for wind and solar but not for nuclear.
Wind and solar can’t hold a radioactive candle to nuclear.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:20 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
instance, upped its spending on lobbying by 500% on the year to 424,000.

Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:23 pm to Scruffy
quote:
quote:
North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, for instance, has an idea of removing only the subsidies for wind and solar but not for nuclear.
Scruffy is ok with that
As is udtiger.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:25 pm to udtiger
quote:
As is udtiger.
As is ragincajun03.
The approval of us three together should ignite a re-write of this bill tonight. Thank you for being true movers and shakers.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:30 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Scruffy is ok with that. Wind and solar can’t hold a radioactive candle to nuclear
Agreed. There should also be a subclassification of green energy options: green reliable and inexpensive (nuclear) and green unreliable and very expensive (wind, solar).
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:34 pm to ragincajun03
This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:35 pm to ragincajun03
They’re all, except 25D individual solar tax credit, going to be kept in but in accelerated phase outs. That’s still a death sentence for nuclear unfortunately unless there a safe harbor provision
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:35 pm to Brightside Bengal
quote:100%
This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:39 pm to Brightside Bengal
quote:
This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.
Need the current generation of old timers to die off, they remember 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl and its scary to them.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:41 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
Need the current generation of old timers to die off, they remember 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl and its scary to them.
It’s usually local politicians, lawyers, judges, etc that are pissed they aren’t getting the lease or easements. Normal people can’t put up a fight.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:42 pm to ragincajun03
Nuclear is what we should be pushing to make cheaper.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:44 pm to elprez00
quote:
Nuclear is what we should be pushing to make cheaper.
I think most people know this is the way to go, but good luck finding a place to put the reactors.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:50 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Data centers and artificial intelligence—this is what is driving the nuclear rush that has benefited from the IRA incentives that GOP legislators now want to remove,
Cool. Let those frickers pay for their own energy needs and stop expecting the fricking taxpayer to subside the rapid growth of AI. They want it? They can pay for it.
ETA: I was told by someone here a while ago that the taxpayer wasn't footing the infrastructure bill for these tech giants and their energy needs.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:55 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
There should also be a subclassification of green energy options: green reliable and inexpensive (nuclear) and green unreliable and very expensive (wind, solar).
One of the myths about nuclear is that it's cheap
It's reliable as you correctly stated but it's not cheap
And wind and solar are no longer as expensive as most people think. They're just not as reliable.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:58 pm to Brightside Bengal
quote:
This country could be completely free of fossil fuel generated electricity if we wouldn't be such pussies and NIMBY's about nuclear energy.
That’s intentional. Progressives hate nuclear because it solves the problem of clean energy too well. They need to push the “hard” solutions because it takes longer and allows them to use it as a Trojan horse for their other social ideology.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:59 pm to Powerman
quote:
One of the myths about nuclear is that it's cheap
Eh, initial cost is staggering. Steady state is actually pretty cheap compared to other sources of energy.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:10 pm to ragincajun03
easy fix, just simplify the beauracratic work necessary and save every one a ton of money
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:38 pm to Lakeboy7
Baton rouge has one.....so does new Orleans.... Seems people here accept it.
Popular
Back to top

17









