- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme Court Weighs Nationwide Injunctions: Your Rights May Be At Risk
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:53 pm
I’m curious about the PT’s thoughts / level of concern about this? Do you support what the Trump administration is proposing here? Not about birthright citizenship, but rather the way in which constitutional legal battles should be fought and resolved at the individual / class action level.
Supreme Court Weighs Nationwide Injunctions: Your Rights May Be At Risk
Lisa Remillard:
“In perhaps the most consequential case of this term, today, the justices heard more than 2 hours of oral arguments in a case to decide whether one single federal judge has the power to issue a nationwide injunction that could stop a president’s executive order. The backdrop of the question is President Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship. Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right clearly defined in the 14th amendment of the constitution and has been interpreted by Supreme Court precedent for more than 100 years. Not to mention, a law passed by congress that solidifies that precedent.
I know this sounds like a wonky legal question but I can not stress to you enough. The ruling in this case is going to affect every single person in this country and depending on how the justices rule, could allow a president to move forward with illegal or unconstitutional policies in certain parts of the country.”
Supreme Court Weighs Nationwide Injunctions: Your Rights May Be At Risk
Lisa Remillard:
“In perhaps the most consequential case of this term, today, the justices heard more than 2 hours of oral arguments in a case to decide whether one single federal judge has the power to issue a nationwide injunction that could stop a president’s executive order. The backdrop of the question is President Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship. Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right clearly defined in the 14th amendment of the constitution and has been interpreted by Supreme Court precedent for more than 100 years. Not to mention, a law passed by congress that solidifies that precedent.
I know this sounds like a wonky legal question but I can not stress to you enough. The ruling in this case is going to affect every single person in this country and depending on how the justices rule, could allow a president to move forward with illegal or unconstitutional policies in certain parts of the country.”
18
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:05 pm to heymama
Well, the Court should at worst limit it to that district's circuit or say it applies to that district.
One problem is it applies to other Circuits that may have a totally different view of the issue. For example, a California judge's law is binding on the Fifth Circuit even though their jurisprudence is completely difference. Crazy.
Here in state courts, a Circuit or Chancery Court's decision is not binding on other districts. It is only precedent in that district, not statewide.
One problem is it applies to other Circuits that may have a totally different view of the issue. For example, a California judge's law is binding on the Fifth Circuit even though their jurisprudence is completely difference. Crazy.
Here in state courts, a Circuit or Chancery Court's decision is not binding on other districts. It is only precedent in that district, not statewide.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:08 pm to heymama
quote:
I’m curious about the PT’s thoughts
Their thoughts are what they’re told by the media trumpkins
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:10 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
media trumpkins
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:18 pm to heymama
How is it that every other position has jurisdictional boundaries. Outside the parish or county where a sheriff is elected, his authority carries zero weight. A mayor can’t pass rules or write policies for a town in the state in which he’s not elected and his authority or jurisdiction doesn’t exist.
This holds true for every single position in ALL forms of government EXCEPT for district judges? They somehow have authority outside of th3 boundaries of their jurisdiction? And, they are totally unique in this distinction?
I don’t think so. They are operating outside the bounds of their authority and the Supreme Court needs to smack them down.
This holds true for every single position in ALL forms of government EXCEPT for district judges? They somehow have authority outside of th3 boundaries of their jurisdiction? And, they are totally unique in this distinction?
I don’t think so. They are operating outside the bounds of their authority and the Supreme Court needs to smack them down.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:54 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
Their thoughts are what they’re told by the media trumpkins
Sneering leftists who make no moves without checking what the leftist position is, saying such bullshite as your post, wear their total lack of self-awareness like a badge of honor.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 2:00 am to heymama
quote:
could allow a president to move forward with illegal or unconstitutional policies in certain parts of the country
And what if that judge is eventually overruled?
Look how many babies have died from Roe. Its no longer the law of the land. I think thats far more devastating than what a prez might do as the Exec
Also, a Hawaii judge feels almost no effect from what goes on in DC. But he rules as if its a crisis within his district
Its not. And shouldnt be treated as such
Posted on 5/16/25 at 2:25 am to heymama
Posted on 5/16/25 at 4:03 am to heymama
If for a second you think Trump is gonna do anything illegal to try and dismantle the corruption you're frickin nutz, this is just a continuation of the
lawfare that's been going on for 10yrs
The Dems and some Republicans are scared to death of him. and I don't care if you're a democrat or republican this shite oughta make you sick, and for all you dems, if you think for a second DC gives a shite about you you better wake the frick up, they'll railroad your arse just like the do the conservatives
A part of me wants to see the shite hit the fan then, maybe you'll wake the frick up, you don't see a bunch of conservative disrupting shite, It's all of you fricked up liberals, Trump is trying to make America respected AGAIN and you fricks are to STUPID to see it KEEP IT UP Ya'll gonna FAFO again in the mid terms
lawfare that's been going on for 10yrs
The Dems and some Republicans are scared to death of him. and I don't care if you're a democrat or republican this shite oughta make you sick, and for all you dems, if you think for a second DC gives a shite about you you better wake the frick up, they'll railroad your arse just like the do the conservatives
A part of me wants to see the shite hit the fan then, maybe you'll wake the frick up, you don't see a bunch of conservative disrupting shite, It's all of you fricked up liberals, Trump is trying to make America respected AGAIN and you fricks are to STUPID to see it KEEP IT UP Ya'll gonna FAFO again in the mid terms
Posted on 5/16/25 at 4:39 am to ole man
quote:
If for a second you think Trump is gonna do anything illegal to try and dismantle the corruption
Trump is a convicted felon. I think for all the seconds he would do something illegal to try and continue the corruption he has spent the first few months of his term instilling. His actions so far prove more than anything how we have given the executive branch too much authority. Thank god these hero judges are stepping in to try to at least stop the bleeding.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:02 am to Froman
quote:
Trump is a convicted felon.
Fake news
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:28 am to Froman
quote:pretty sure you are an atheist and the stupidest mf on the planet.
Thank god these hero judges are stepping in to try to at least stop the bleeding.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:32 am to heymama
quote:
Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right clearly defined in the 14th amendment
False premise.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:47 am to Froman
quote:
corruption he has spent the first few months of his term instilling
Examples?
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:53 am to heymama
Right now, we need the MAGA executive to fight to save the nation, but an evil liberal democrat could abuse that for sure.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:58 am to heymama
quote:
The backdrop of the question is President Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship. Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right clearly defined in the 14th amendment of the constitution and has been interpreted by Supreme Court precedent for more than 100 years
What is interesting about this quote is that the court used and interpreted English common law from the 1600's and it is not even true today - you do not become a citizen of England by fldripping a baby there
Sometimes courts are wrong/wong
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:06 am to heymama
quote:
could allow a president to move forward with illegal or unconstitutional policies in certain parts of the country.”
We already went through that with obama and sleepy without any court injunctions.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:07 am to djsdawg
quote:
Right now, we need the MAGA executive to fight to save the nation, but an evil liberal democrat could abuse that for sure.
So what happens when a libtard is in charge again and we’ve done away with national injunctions…and that libtard attempts to unconstitutionally take your guns?
Are you prepared to fight the executive branch for years through the lower courts? And watch your neighbor recover his gun before you bc he was part of a class action lawsuit you didn’t get to be a part of. That’s stupid.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:28 am to Froman
quote:
Trump is a convicted felon. I think for all the seconds he would do something illegal to try and continue the corruption he has spent the first few months of his term instilling. His actions so far prove more than anything how we have given the executive branch too much authority. Thank god these hero judges are stepping in to try to at least stop the bleeding.
You have to be the dumbest son of a bitch that post here...and that's saying a lot because here lately this board is ate up with fricking retards
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:31 am to ole man
Give it a frickin rest dude with that shite, your just another typical left wing frick up with the same old shite, people see through ya'lls shite frick off
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News