- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Many companies that rolled back DEI policies are quietly bringing them back
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:03 pm
It worked so well in the past, why not try this crap again?!?! What's so hard to understand about DEI lost in November?!?! And thinking that consumers are stupid will NEVER work.
LINK /
More than half of companies that have done away with diversity, equity and inclusion policies or scaled them back say it was political pressure or public scrutiny that led to those decisions.
But one in seven companies who did so now say it was a mistake, according to a survey of 750 business leaders at organizations who’ve done so in the past six months.
Now, the survey indicates 20% of leaders at companies who’ve rolled back DEI policies say they are bringing back DEI initiatives, but quietly, not with public fanfare.
“Companies don’t want to seem performative, or even admit that they were wrong. They want to recruit more diverse talent. Bringing it back quietly, like putting information on their website, allows them to do it without making a big deal out of it,” said Julia Toothacre, career strategist at Resume Templates.
Some of those companies are renaming those initiatives to things such as “inclusive culture” or “culture of belonging,” not necessarily to hide their purpose, but to get away from the negative stigma “DEI” has now.
Toothacre also notes some irony in one of the common reasons companies are bringing back DEI policies.
“Thirty-three percent said it was harder to hire diverse talent. What did they think was going to happen when they eliminated all of their DEI initiatives? And so they inadvertently created an environment that said, ‘Hey, we don’t care if you are comfortable here or not,’” she said.
The evolution of diversity and inclusion was intended to improve company culture. But of those responding to the survey, 75% said reviving DEI policies is actually about the bottom line, or doing what is best for the company, rather than being rooted in values or social responsibility.
LINK /
More than half of companies that have done away with diversity, equity and inclusion policies or scaled them back say it was political pressure or public scrutiny that led to those decisions.
But one in seven companies who did so now say it was a mistake, according to a survey of 750 business leaders at organizations who’ve done so in the past six months.
Now, the survey indicates 20% of leaders at companies who’ve rolled back DEI policies say they are bringing back DEI initiatives, but quietly, not with public fanfare.
“Companies don’t want to seem performative, or even admit that they were wrong. They want to recruit more diverse talent. Bringing it back quietly, like putting information on their website, allows them to do it without making a big deal out of it,” said Julia Toothacre, career strategist at Resume Templates.
Some of those companies are renaming those initiatives to things such as “inclusive culture” or “culture of belonging,” not necessarily to hide their purpose, but to get away from the negative stigma “DEI” has now.
Toothacre also notes some irony in one of the common reasons companies are bringing back DEI policies.
“Thirty-three percent said it was harder to hire diverse talent. What did they think was going to happen when they eliminated all of their DEI initiatives? And so they inadvertently created an environment that said, ‘Hey, we don’t care if you are comfortable here or not,’” she said.
The evolution of diversity and inclusion was intended to improve company culture. But of those responding to the survey, 75% said reviving DEI policies is actually about the bottom line, or doing what is best for the company, rather than being rooted in values or social responsibility.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:09 pm to conservativewifeymom
Corporate America are whores to the liberal outrage industry. There are literally entire professions that only exist in the C-Suite because of DEI. Of course those people won't willingly give them up.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:15 pm to conservativewifeymom
Nothing says good idea like having to implement it in the dark
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:20 pm to conservativewifeymom
It’s ok if they crash the plane that I’m on, as long as they FEEL like they belong.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:21 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
75% said reviving DEI policies is actually about the bottom line, or doing what is best for the company, rather than being rooted in values or social responsibility.
Yeah, right
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:29 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
75% said reviving DEI policies is actually about the bottom line
No they didn't
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:34 pm to conservativewifeymom
It never went away at my company. We’re a very large company that caters almost exclusively to the blue collar industry. Customers would never know but internally we’re always recognizing women, or international this or that. We just did earth day.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:35 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
And thinking that consumers are stupid will NEVER work.
Are you kidding? Our entire economy depends on consumers making bad choices for themselves in the marketplace.

Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:35 pm to conservativewifeymom
You can call it DEI, affirmative action, social justice or whatever else but it's all just anti-white racism and the fact that they have to rebrand it every few years shows they know what they're doing is wrong.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:36 pm to conservativewifeymom
The group that benefited the most from DEI practices was white women and down at the very bottom were black men and women.
You’d think based on that alone minority Dem voters would be against it, yet they push and support it like it’s been life changing for people who aren’t white.
You’d think based on that alone minority Dem voters would be against it, yet they push and support it like it’s been life changing for people who aren’t white.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:37 pm to conservativewifeymom
It never really went away, it was just re-labeled.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:41 pm to YMCA
quote:
The group that benefited the most from DEI practices was white women
This is absolutely true at my company. We’ve made a big push to put more women in management positions, often suspiciously passing up more qualified male counterparts. Often the results aren’t good
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:48 pm to redneck hippie
My former unit has a dei wing commander.
Her priorities for hiring and promotions are as follows
1 minority
2 female
3 if 1 and 2 aren't available you're encouraged to hire the best candidate.
She says we simply must make right the sins of the past.
Now she wonders why her flying squadrons are empty.
Her priorities for hiring and promotions are as follows
1 minority
2 female
3 if 1 and 2 aren't available you're encouraged to hire the best candidate.
She says we simply must make right the sins of the past.
Now she wonders why her flying squadrons are empty.
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:53 pm to GruntbyAssociation
It's a joke, and it has been forever. It's a circular, ridiculous fiction. ESG, DEI, all of it.
The top level begins with something like, "our customers demand that we have a diverse talent pool." No they don't. They don't know about your workforce and don't care unless you tell them and make them feel bad about it.
Law firm: Our clients demand diversity in our ranks. It's for our bottom line, and it's the right thing to do!
Law firm client, say, Coca-Cola: Our customers demand diversity in our professional services companies and our workforce
Customers: We don't care at all who Coke hires or what color the lawyers are who work on Coke matters until Coke makes advertisements that make us feel like we should care.
They pile layers of circular abstract absurdity on to justify a cult-like argument for this stuff but you can usually trace back either to nothing, or to some other real-world interest (like capital access via ESG) and behind that is another 8 layers of complete BS with no actual demand from end users/consumers.
Once upon a time I think "businesses wouldn't behave this way if they didn't think it was good for their bottom line" was a fairly reliable mantra, but post OWS and especially post 2020, I think that has seriously faltered as a concept to live by.
The top level begins with something like, "our customers demand that we have a diverse talent pool." No they don't. They don't know about your workforce and don't care unless you tell them and make them feel bad about it.
Law firm: Our clients demand diversity in our ranks. It's for our bottom line, and it's the right thing to do!
Law firm client, say, Coca-Cola: Our customers demand diversity in our professional services companies and our workforce
Customers: We don't care at all who Coke hires or what color the lawyers are who work on Coke matters until Coke makes advertisements that make us feel like we should care.
They pile layers of circular abstract absurdity on to justify a cult-like argument for this stuff but you can usually trace back either to nothing, or to some other real-world interest (like capital access via ESG) and behind that is another 8 layers of complete BS with no actual demand from end users/consumers.
Once upon a time I think "businesses wouldn't behave this way if they didn't think it was good for their bottom line" was a fairly reliable mantra, but post OWS and especially post 2020, I think that has seriously faltered as a concept to live by.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:04 pm to conservativewifeymom
Need a lot more civil rights cases brought against this anti-merit discrimination.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:34 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
Thirty-three percent said it was harder to hire diverse talent. What did they think was going to happen when they eliminated all of their DEI initiatives?

Absurd
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:36 pm to conservativewifeymom
DOJ Civil Rights division needs to hammer them for discriminatory practices.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:16 pm to conservativewifeymom
Oncor renamed theirs.
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:19 pm to conservativewifeymom
My guess is the companies doing this are ones that make most of their money off of customers who support DEI
Popular
Back to top
