Started By
Message

What is the right size pot for crawfish boil

Posted on 4/1/25 at 8:05 am
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28712 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 8:05 am
I've been using a pretty small pot, don't even know the size, but it barely holds a sack of crawfish and can't have anythign else in it and I need to upgrade.

What is the ideal size for one sack and plenty of room for potatoes, corn, etc.?

is 60qt too small?
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
23449 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 8:08 am to
quote:

is 60qt too small?


yes. 100 qt at a minimum for a sack.
Posted by urtoosmall
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
510 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 8:17 am to
General rule

80 qt = 1 sack
100 qt - 1.5 sacks = 3 sacks in 2 boils (handy if you occasionally boil for a group)
120 qt - 2 sacks in 1 boil

Beware: a 120 qt pot full of water will be very heavy
Posted by LSUballs
RayVegas LA
Member since Feb 2008
39049 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I've been using a pretty small pot, don't even know the size, but it barely holds a sack of crawfish




You have a 60 qt, most likely. They will barely hold a sack. 80qt is good for a sack. 100qt good for a sack and a good bit of accoutrements. 120 for 2 sacks.
Posted by REB BEER
Laffy Yet
Member since Dec 2010
17151 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 8:54 am to
I have a 100 quart and think it's the perfect size. FIL has a 60 quart and it's too small IMO.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57989 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 9:35 am to
quote:

100 qt at a minimum for a sack.
are you retarded?
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57989 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

You have a 60 qt, most likely. They will barely hold a sack. 80qt is good for a sack. 100qt good for a sack and a good bit of accoutrements. 120 for 2 sacks.
This... a 60 quart pot has boiled many many sacks..... you just cat fit much else in there. 80 is the perfect size for weekend boilers.

bigger is just convenience for space but you sacrifice more time to get them up to a boil. you could jsut lower the water volume as well.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
51524 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:09 am to
quote:

You have a 60 qt, most likely. They will barely hold a sack. 80qt is good for a sack. 100qt good for a sack and a good bit of accoutrements. 120 for 2 sacks.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
23309 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

General rule

80 qt = 1 sack
100 qt - 1.5 sacks = 3 sacks in 2 boils (handy if you occasionally boil for a group)
120 qt - 2 sacks in 1 boil

Beware: a 120 qt pot full of water will be very heavy


This is correct.

You have a 60 qt pot most likely. 80 qt is the perfect size for 1 sack plus plenty of room for vegetables / sides.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
18150 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

yes. 100 qt at a minimum for a sack.



Says the guy who has no clue.

I have an 80 qt. pot and it easily holds mid 30 lb. sacks with all the fixings.

I can even get a 40 lb. sack to fit, but it is chock full at that weight.

I aim to buy 35-37 lb. sacks when I hit the seafood dealer.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
26222 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 12:44 pm to
I boil one sack at a time in an 80q stainless pot. Works perfectly.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
23449 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Says the guy who has no clue.


Bruh. I have boiled more crawfish than you could imagine. I don’t like my crawfish coming out the top of the pot. I also take into consideration the basket. Some baskets leave less room than others. But pile on me and keep going with your Mickey Mouse one sack boils.



This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 1:22 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
86903 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

But pile on me and keep going with your Mickey Mouse one sack boils.


Is this supposed to be an insult? The thread is about a one sack boil. Your first post in this thread, while ridiculous, was about a one sack boil.

Guess your 100qt pot is compensating for your tiny peen
Posted by PerplenGold
TX
Member since Nov 2021
1924 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 1:52 pm to
Bigger is better but 60qt works for me. We're in TX so not surrounded by coonasses boiling often or for large groups. And, we travel for boils more than at home. The pot/burner/tank all fit perfectly inside my wash tub to hit the road.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
18150 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Beware: a 120 qt pot full of water will be very heavy



I never break a sweat emptying any pot of any size. The easiest way to do it is to take a long enough length of garden hose and put one end in the bottom of the pot when done boiling and put a brick on it to hold it down.

Then hook up the other end to your faucet and let it run into the pot to clear any air out of the hose. Then quickly unhook the end on the faucet and let it down on the ground below the bottom level of the pot and it will drain down to about 1 or 2 gallons left in the pot.

Just like you once syphoned gas out of your dad's gas tank as a kid to fuel your go-cart.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
23449 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:01 pm to
Are you a Martini alter? Ffs yall are miserable in here. Now I know why I don’t post here anymore.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
18150 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Are you a Martini alter? Ffs yall are miserable in here. Now I know why I don’t post here anymore.



You brought it on yourself with your "100 qt. minimum for a sack" post.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57989 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Now I know why I don’t post here anymore.
maybe you stopped because you got made fun of one too many times for saying something retarded like 100qt is the minimum size for a sack... when clearly you can boil a sack in a 60qt pot.
This post was edited on 4/1/25 at 2:17 pm
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
23449 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

maybe you stopped because you got made fun of one too many times for saying something retarded like 100qt is the minimum size for a sack... when clearly you can boil a sack in a 60qt pot.


Damn ya'll sure get worked up over a few extra quarts.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57989 posts
Posted on 4/1/25 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Damn ya'll sure get worked up
quote:

Ffs yall are miserable in here. Now I know why I don’t post here anymore.
seems YOU get worked up over 40 qts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram