- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Colorado House Democrats defend adding abortion to state Medicaid: “cheaper than birth”
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:37 am
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:37 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
"That savings comes from the averted births that will not occur because abortions happened instead," McCluskie said in a video shared to social media. "So a birth is more expensive than an abortion — so the saving comes in Medicaid births that will not occur."
“A modest proposal” is no longer satire.
23
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:38 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Can we abort the mothers instead?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:38 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I guess we can afford to kill babies to save the world.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:42 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Which should government prioritize?
Colorado House Democrats defend adding abortion to state Medicaid: “cheaper than birth”
Prudent expenditure of tax revenues paid by everyone or social policies favored by a very vocal minority?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:45 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I would prefer the state pay for sterilization. If poor people want to screw like rabbits and dont want to buy a $1 condom they they should be on board with it.
Actions have consequences. They need to pay for their orgasams.
Hell I would even give them a $2500 signing bonus.
Actions have consequences. They need to pay for their orgasams.
Hell I would even give them a $2500 signing bonus.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:47 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
OK let's apply their "logic" to other areas then ..... instead of spending time and money filing lawsuits against tyrannical government overreach and fighting their own lawfare initiatives .... it's just cheaper to kill them
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:47 am to EliasGrodin
I don’t think murdering children to save money is a good idea
There are strong arguments for abortion rights such as privacy, health of women, etc
Eugenics is by far the worst of the arguments and abortionists should not employ that argument ever
There are strong arguments for abortion rights such as privacy, health of women, etc
Eugenics is by far the worst of the arguments and abortionists should not employ that argument ever
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:48 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
by the same logic, it's cheaper to let poor people starve to death than pay for their welfare
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:50 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Eugenics is by far the worst of the arguments and abortionists should not employ that argument ever
Isn't eugenics one of the founding tenants of early abortion thought?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:52 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
You know what is better than abortion? Just about every other thing in LIFE ! And until that day then even birth control is cheaper than abortion in money and soul
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:54 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:I understand your position, but it is entirely consistent with my question (social views of vocal minority).
I don’t think murdering children to save money is a good idea
quote:There is no "eugenics" element in this Colorado move.
Eugenics is by far the worst of the arguments and abortionists should not employ that argument ever
Posted on 3/28/25 at 9:56 am to EliasGrodin
quote:
There is no "eugenics" element in this Colorado move.
Eugenics (/ju?'d??n?ks/ yoo-JEN-iks; from Ancient Greek e?~ (eû) 'good, well' and -?e??? (gen?s) 'born, come into being, growing/grown')[1] is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population.
Sure there is, but like virtually everything they do the democrats just call it something else.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:03 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Margaret Sanger would be blushing with pride
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:04 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Except illegals..."We'll pay for illegals to have as many babies as they want".
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:05 am to Revelator
quote:Did Planned Parenthood conduct abortions under Sanger's leadership?
Margaret Sanger would be blushing with pride
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:07 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
These are very evil people and it's sick so many in our nation see human sacrifice as either a "right" or a political point for any reason. It's indefensible and yet...
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:11 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
“A modest proposal” is no longer satire.
Know whats cheaper than abortion?
Mass sterilization...
She should introduce that.
Anyone paying under $1 in taxes after 18 should be immediately sterilized.
Since cheap is the overriding function.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:15 am to EliasGrodin
quote:
Did Planned Parenthood conduct abortions under Sanger's leadership?
It wasn’t called Planned Parenthood then, but it morphed into it.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:21 am to Revelator
quote:The Birth Control Federation of America changed its name to Planned Parenthood in 1942. Was it performing abortions at that time?
Margaret Sanger would be blushing with pridequote:It wasn’t called Planned Parenthood then, but it morphed into it.
Did Planned Parenthood conduct abortions under Sanger's leadership?
Margaret Sanger retired as head of the organization in 1959. Was it performing abortions at that time?
This post was edited on 3/28/25 at 10:45 am
Posted on 3/28/25 at 10:27 am to EliasGrodin
quote:
Prudent expenditure of tax revenues
Why not gas anyone who doesn't pay taxes? Execute anyone convicted of a crime? Kill anyone with a disability?
fricking nazi.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News