- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
En Banc Ninth Circuit Upholds California Ammo Magazine Ban
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:13 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:13 am
quote:
The Golden State’s blanket ban on ammunition magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds is constitutional, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday. A divided en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld California’s ban on so-called large-capacity magazines. The court split 7-4, with the majority holding that the types of magazines covered under the ban do not count as “arms” under the Second Amendment. “Large-capacity magazines are optional accessories to firearms, and firearms operate as intended without a large-capacity magazine,” Judge Susan Graber wrote in Duncan v. Bonta. “A large-capacity magazine is thus an accessory or accoutrement, not an ‘Arm’ in itself. Possession of a large-capacity magazine therefore falls outside the text of the Second Amendment.”
https://thereload.com/en-banc-ninth-circuit-upholds-california-ammo-magazine-ban/
What if I made a 20 round revolver?
17
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:16 am to loogaroo
Barrett will side with the leftists once it hits the Supreme Court. That's what happens when you virtue signal with the mama bear female demographic.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:16 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Barrett will side with the leftists once it hits the Supreme Court. T
I'll take that bet.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:18 am to loogaroo
Look the 9th circuit did mental gymnastics to hold the most liberal position
Shocking news
Why the Supreme Court hasn't ruled on this yet is bullshite
Assault weapon bans and magazine bans should be long gone
This ruling essentially means they can ban anything but a single shot gun
Shocking news
Why the Supreme Court hasn't ruled on this yet is bullshite
Assault weapon bans and magazine bans should be long gone
This ruling essentially means they can ban anything but a single shot gun
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 10:20 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'll take that bet.
Me too. This is DOA at the Supreme Court.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:20 am to loogaroo
quote:
The court split 7-4, with the majority holding that the types of magazines covered under the ban do not count as “arms” under the Second Amendment.
This is why bump stocks and pistol braces matter, people.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:21 am to loogaroo
quote:
What if I made a 20 round revolver?
Or a belt fed with no magazines at all
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 10:23 am
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:25 am to Nosevens
quote:
I’d probably buy one
I’m about 150 years too late.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:28 am to Barbados
quote:
Why the Supreme Court hasn't ruled on this yet is bullshite
aka John Roberts.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 10:46 am to SCLibertarian
She’s atoning for her the abortion decision, by voting left on every other decision.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:03 am to loogaroo
Every gun law on the books is unconstitutional. They are all an infringement.
The only gun law I would support is one that requires every citizen to own one.
The only gun law I would support is one that requires every citizen to own one.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:34 am to loogaroo
quote:
What if I made a 20 round revolver?
It would be really heavy.
But I'd still buy it.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:39 am to loogaroo
If a 20-round mag is illegal and just an accessory then what’s to keep them from banning any magazine? Ten rounds is an arbitrary number. Only single shot rifles and revolvers will be legal.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:40 am to biglego
quote:
If a 20-round mag is illegal and just an accessory then what’s to keep them from banning any magazine? Ten rounds is an arbitrary number. Only single shot rifles and revolvers will be legal.
They will also just ban ammunition next
Its not a gun after all
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:43 am to biglego
quote:
If a 20-round mag is illegal and just an accessory then what’s to keep them from banning any magazine? Ten rounds is an arbitrary number. Only single shot rifles and revolvers will be legal.
Stating the obvious for BamaAtl and 4cubbies, it isn't about banning magazines, pistol braces, or bump stocks. The goal is disarmament.
Politicians and the elites don't want us to be able to defend ourselves from their authoritarian bullshite, and their useful idiots buy into the bullshite they sell about how we'd be such a utopia, if we'd only submit and turn our safety over to the government.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:43 am to loogaroo
Free speech doesn’t apply to keyboards. They are only an accessory
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:49 am to loogaroo
You’d be a tough SOB just being able to hold up that and get a bead on your intended louse.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:05 pm to biglego
quote:
If a 20-round mag is illegal and just an accessory then what’s to keep them from banning any magazine? Ten rounds is an arbitrary number. Only single shot rifles and revolvers will be legal.
California has a leg to stand on, for now, because a number of east coast states like Delaware and New Jersey have fricking asinine limits on mag capacity.
I want to say one has a limit of 10 and the other has a limit of 6.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:08 pm to loogaroo
quote:Silly. Next they will ban barrels and firing pins. “Just accessories!”
holding that the types of magazines covered under the ban do not count as “arms” under the Second Amendment. “Large-capacity magazines are optional accessories to firearms, and firearms operate as intended without a large-capacity magazine,”
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News