- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ok Karoline, we know that the activist judges are trying to screw Trump
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:51 pm
And that the left is judge shopping. We’ve seen it since the 1st EO. I’m tired of watching it and seeing the White House continue to comply and fight in the (crooked) court. I want Trump to tell these judges to stick it up their lubed up asses and GFY’s.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
12
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:53 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
they are trying to bait Trump into contempt.
impeaching or the congress critters saying they will impeach the Judge sours their plans so Roberts spoke up.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. impeaching or the congress critters saying they will impeach the Judge sours their plans so Roberts spoke up.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:54 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
I’m far from being an attorney, but shouldn’t jurisdictional factors preclude the ability to “judge shop?”
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:55 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
After I saw that I came to this conclusion in another thread:
"The Trump administration currently appears to be adopting a strategy of superficial compliance with judicial rulings, while anticipating that the judiciary will perceive their actions as noncompliance. The Department of Justice should consider treating lower court rulings as advisory opinions, particularly when they encroach upon the executive branch's Article II responsibilities. If lower court judges hold executive branch officials in contempt, President Trump could issue pardons, allowing the executive to continue exercising its constitutional duties unimpeded.
The tactic of using lower courts to delay or obstruct the executive branch's Article II functions must be addressed. The administration could achieve this by outwardly respecting and appeasing the lower courts, while adhering to the executive's own interpretation of compliance. However, once a case reaches the Supreme Court and a ruling is issued, the executive branch should fully abide by the decision. This approach would balance deference to the judicial process with the preservation of executive authority.
This is how I think the Trump admin is currently proceeding."
"The Trump administration currently appears to be adopting a strategy of superficial compliance with judicial rulings, while anticipating that the judiciary will perceive their actions as noncompliance. The Department of Justice should consider treating lower court rulings as advisory opinions, particularly when they encroach upon the executive branch's Article II responsibilities. If lower court judges hold executive branch officials in contempt, President Trump could issue pardons, allowing the executive to continue exercising its constitutional duties unimpeded.
The tactic of using lower courts to delay or obstruct the executive branch's Article II functions must be addressed. The administration could achieve this by outwardly respecting and appeasing the lower courts, while adhering to the executive's own interpretation of compliance. However, once a case reaches the Supreme Court and a ruling is issued, the executive branch should fully abide by the decision. This approach would balance deference to the judicial process with the preservation of executive authority.
This is how I think the Trump admin is currently proceeding."
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:57 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
they are trying to bait Trump into contempt.
And he will just pardon those administration officials. These judges need to stay on their side of the sandbox. Stay in Article III. Get out of Article II.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:57 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Because the Whitehouse is smart.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:00 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Pretty dangerous rhetoric from the WH honestly.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:01 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
White House continue to comply
I get the impression that they are complying on their (Trump's) terms. Call it superficial compliance if you will. The judges have zero enforcement power so the Trump agenda should simply move along unimpeded.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:01 pm to GamecockUltimate
quote:
Pretty dangerous rhetoric from the WH honestly.
Dangerous for who? TDA?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:03 pm to GumboPot
Right. frick the contempt. Let’s fight!!!
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:03 pm to GamecockUltimate
quote:
Pretty dangerous rhetoric from the WH honestly.
LMAO. So Scary.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:04 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Just get Bondi to find something like collusion to file charges against him personally. It’s what the left would do in this situation. That guy probably has all kinds of skeletons in his closet.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:05 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
And that the left is judge shopping. We’ve seen it since the 1st EO. I’m tired of watching it and seeing the White House continue to comply and fight in the (crooked) court. I want Trump to tell these judges to stick it up their lubed up asses and GFY’s.
It's not slowing the flights down. They're still moving the aliens out.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:07 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
It's not slowing the flights down. They're still moving the aliens out.
And the money is still locked down and Elon continues to look for more WF&A to sequester and for congress to eventually cut.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:10 pm to GumboPot
Doesn't Trump have immunity for official acts? Settled by the Supreme Court. He can them to take a hike.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:14 pm to High C
quote:
I’m far from being an attorney, but shouldn’t jurisdictional factors preclude the ability to “judge shop?”
You also don’t get to pick your judge when to file in a jurisdiction.
The right trying to paint Boasberg as a radical leftist is hilarious.
Dude wouldn’t even make Trump disclose his tax returns.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:18 pm to GamecockUltimate
quote:
Pretty dangerous rhetoric
quote:
And by the way, if they want to think they want to take on government if we get out of line, which they’re talking again about, guess what, they need F-15s. They don’t need a rifle.”
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:20 pm to SammyTiger
Poor Sammy....gay and retarded is a bad way to live.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:22 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
The right trying to paint Boasberg as a radical leftist is hilarious.
Tell me why you believe he's not a radical leftist.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:22 pm to Houag80
quote:
Poor Sammy....gay and retarded is a bad way to live.
Single digit IQ response to facts.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News