- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We see a lot about these activist judge rulings………
Posted on 3/15/25 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 3/15/25 at 8:57 pm
But I’ve seen nothing in what the admin did in response? Did they ignore, appeal, what?
Posted on 3/15/25 at 9:02 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
Wait what? I’m sorry what did you say?
I missed the email. Text me next time.
Sincerely DJT.
I missed the email. Text me next time.
Sincerely DJT.
This post was edited on 3/15/25 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 3/15/25 at 9:02 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
Some stuff has already reached the appellate courts so it’s apparent they’re filing appeals in at least some instances. Which I guess they could be ignoring some of it and still appealing.
Would be nice to have a tracker of each zany “ruling”, showing what the current status is. Is there ?
Would be nice to have a tracker of each zany “ruling”, showing what the current status is. Is there ?
Posted on 3/15/25 at 9:39 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
They’re throwing shite at the wall and seeing what will stick.
Idiots.
Idiots.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 9:44 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
They should have a “3 strikes and your impeached” rule. If they get overturned.
Let see how many are willing to risk their career for this political warfare.
Let see how many are willing to risk their career for this political warfare.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 10:08 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
I don't know why they don't have Joe Citizen or an Angel Mom filing cases demanding deportation in friendly courts instead of reacting to this flood the zone tactic by the Marxists.
Pick up a bunch of illegals. Courtesy notification to a citizen in the area. In notification say they are detaining pending X, Y, or Z. Have citizen file case in the hour demanding deportation in that Fed district.
That way when the Marxists file their case the first ruling by the other Fed judge is supreme.
Pick up a bunch of illegals. Courtesy notification to a citizen in the area. In notification say they are detaining pending X, Y, or Z. Have citizen file case in the hour demanding deportation in that Fed district.
That way when the Marxists file their case the first ruling by the other Fed judge is supreme.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 10:18 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
How do we allow judges to change or even make policy?
Posted on 3/15/25 at 11:27 pm to bamacoullion
Obama fundamentally changed the country by filling seats with activist judges.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 11:44 pm to bamacoullion
quote:We don't.
How do we allow judges to change or even make policy?
They just ensure that those who DO "make policy" follow existing law in doing so.
This concept ain't rocket surgery.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 11:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
follow existing law in doing so.
Except they aren’t and many don’t.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 11:48 pm to AggieHank86
If that were true these judges wouldn't continuously be overruled.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 11:51 pm to LifeTimeTiger2
I don't understand why the DOJ can't do anything to rein any of these judges in. They should have to answer to someone. If they answer to congress, we need to get on that, while we own both sides of the legislature.
Posted on 3/15/25 at 11:56 pm to Da #1 Stunna
quote:Interesting way to phrase the fact that you don't understand the Constitution or the concept of "Separation of Powers."
I don't understand why the DOJ can't do anything to rein any of these judges in.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 2:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
They just ensure that those who DO "make policy" follow existing law in doing so.
That's the theory, anyway.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 3:02 am to I20goon
quote:
I don't know why they don't have Joe Citizen or an Angel Mom filing cases demanding deportation in friendly courts instead of reacting to this flood the zone tactic by the Marxists.
Pick up a bunch of illegals. Courtesy notification to a citizen in the area. In notification say they are detaining pending X, Y, or Z. Have citizen file case in the hour demanding deportation in that Fed district.
That way when the Marxists file their case the first ruling by the other Fed judge is supreme.
Immigration is settled because the Democrats spent the Biden years getting it hammered out that Immigration Enforcement was the sole discretion of the Federales, then didn't realize Trump could win again.
Firing Yuge Tracts of FedGov? Hasn't really been judiciated yet. Can Trump fire the DoE? The original law has a number of positions that probably have to be legally affirmed and filled. But the rest were probably set in place under a "The Department Heads decide the Budget" line-measure, and Trump is free to tell Linda to fire all of them.
No doubt you'll get a screaming bitch arse blue balls libtard judge to try and immediately overturn those other positions, and it will (if Amy isn't on the fricking rag again) get proper adjudication from the Supreme Court.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 3:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Interesting way to phrase the fact that you don't understand the Constitution or the concept of "Separation of Powers."
I dont think you or these Judges do. See Article 2. The President is the country's Chief Law Enforcement Officer.Those people are CLEARLY here illegally.The judges usurp Executive authority and they know it when they issue orders.
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 3:40 am
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:03 am to AggieHank86
Ha ha ha, you wanted kamala to win didn’t you?
Posted on 3/16/25 at 4:11 am to da foozball
He wanted to keep the grift and grooming going.
Posted on 3/16/25 at 7:12 am to antibarner
quote:
See Article 2. The President is the country's Chief Law Enforcement Officer.Those people are CLEARLY here illegally.The judges usurp Executive authority and they know it when they issue orders.
This is true. However, none of it addresses the original post suggesting that DOJ rein in the judges. The judicial branch is a separate entity and dies not report to DOJ which is in the Executive branch. The only legal recourse is for them to be impeached, which at the current moment seems like something nobody in Congress has the will to do.
Popular
Back to top
