- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Pam Bondi announced that the Epstein files will be redacted
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:07 am
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:07 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. First time I'm disappointed in the Trump 47 administration
89
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:07 am to stout
Bondi has been a huge disappointment
Release all the fricking files immediately...JFK, RFK, Epstein
Release all the fricking files immediately...JFK, RFK, Epstein
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 6:08 am
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:11 am to stout
quote:
...due to national security concerns.
Sure, Jan!
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:12 am to stout
We’ve obviously done some really shitty things with our “allies”. And it sounds like they’ve likely got the goods on some of our politicians on both sides.
Shameful
Shameful
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:12 am to stout
DEI hires get you this. Women have no business in this role. They are Nanny Staters through and through.
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 6:13 am
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:14 am to stout
They need to be redacted because it's pretty clear Epstein was working for Mossad. Only question is whether CIA was aware of it (at the time).
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:14 am to stout
For national security…
Hello sneaky Jerusalem boiz
Hello sneaky Jerusalem boiz
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:14 am to stout
Ahhh yes. When you’ve run out of options after backing yourself into a corner bring out “National Security” the tried and true way to tell the citizens that they just can’t have what they’re asking for.
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 6:17 am
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:16 am to stout
quote:
First time I'm disappointed in the Trump 47 administration
I think this is where most of us are. She needs to do less Hannity and more indictments.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:17 am to stout
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/16/25 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:18 am to stout
What national security concerns?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:18 am to stout
A list cannot be released with a buncha criminals and crimes and no arrest.
Arrest will have to come before a release.
Imagine being on that list and you didn’t commit a crime. How bad would that be.
Arrest first. Makes no sense to release accusations and the public gets in a feeding frenzy.
Never shoulda made this “promise”.
Arrest will have to come before a release.
Imagine being on that list and you didn’t commit a crime. How bad would that be.
Arrest first. Makes no sense to release accusations and the public gets in a feeding frenzy.
Never shoulda made this “promise”.
This post was edited on 3/7/25 at 6:19 am
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:18 am to stout
This suggests that Epstein was not simply a blackmail/sex operation, it was espionage. So the question is: Espionage on behalf of what country?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:19 am to stout
quote:
First time I'm disappointed in the Trump 47 administration
So you believe that they should just release all State secrets to satisfy your curiosity? It’s very obvious that JE was a government asset..why do you deserve to know anything about those dealings?
As long as those who abused children are brought to justice, no one needs to know anything more. If the names need to be redacted until charges are brought, so be it.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:19 am to stout
They could have always released a "full list", yet pull info out beforehand, and most of us would have never known.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:19 am to stout
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:20 am to stout
So she's been lying her arse off for a week now? Or more than a week?
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:20 am to C
quote:
We’ve obviously done some really shitty things with our “allies”. And it sounds like they’ve likely got the goods on some of our politicians on both sides.
Absolutely. (Tin Foil Hat warning) I wonder if the dirt they had on Dandy Andy has anything to do with UK’s immigration policy?
We know they compromised the then 2nd in line to the crown. We focus on celebrity names. No telling how many politicians and judges are on the “client list”.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:21 am to stout
I figured we wouldn’t see anything.
She’s bad with media. She oversold her hand when she had nothing and has had to try and shift the narrative and has done it poorly.
It went from, I have everything on my desk to, it will come out in phases, no the fbi was withholding info, well it’s a national security concern.
She’s bad with media. She oversold her hand when she had nothing and has had to try and shift the narrative and has done it poorly.
It went from, I have everything on my desk to, it will come out in phases, no the fbi was withholding info, well it’s a national security concern.
Posted on 3/7/25 at 6:22 am to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
So she's been lying her arse off for a week now? Or more than a week?
Now you like when people post X links and engage?
Page 1 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News