Started By
Message

Climate change swings and misses again

Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:21 am
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
14516 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:21 am
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
14551 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:22 am to
Woopsies
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
107671 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:22 am to
Lololololololol
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
26051 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:24 am to
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
7226 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:24 am to
Hahahhahahha

I’ve been in these debates with the climate change clowns so many times.

They never know what the CURRENT CO2 level is…they have no clue what the optimum range is for humans and for plant life and that we are below it by 200-400ppm.
That alone ends the argument.
Posted by SallysHuman
With Sally
Member since Jan 2025
2539 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:24 am to
Wait til you learn about why the greening of the planet is ackshually a bad thing, lol.
quote:

While the "greening of the planet" might seem positive at first glance, it's considered problematic because it's primarily driven by rising carbon dioxide levels, which leads to several negative consequences including: reduced nutritional value in plants, potential disruption of ecosystems in drylands by increased vegetation, masking underlying environmental issues, and not addressing the root cause of climate change by simply increasing plant growth without tackling carbon emissions.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39569 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:27 am to
Yes, but the lefties “built” the great green wall of Africa! That is what did this, not trees getting their necessary CO2!

This is tantamount to someone with a respiratory illness getting oxygen.

You know…what people need.

Net zero carbon emissions is a stupid policy, not based in



Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
46605 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:35 am to
quote:

and not addressing the root cause of climate change by simply increasing plant growth without tackling carbon emissions.

And there you have it. If the solution does not include punishing the human race, especially the wealthy parts, then it’s JUST NOT an acceptable solution.

The same thread runs through leftist thinking when discussing the Laffer Curve, which shows that, at certain levels of taxation, tax cuts yield MORE revenue. The Left used to argue that, even if that’s true, it’s bad. More money, with which we can help the poor, is bad because it rewards, instead of punishing, the wealthy.
Posted by BuckeyeGoon
Member since Jan 2025
236 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:39 am to
"Science deniers" keep eating, have the global warming/climate change freaks got a single one of these predictions correct yet?
Posted by SallysHuman
With Sally
Member since Jan 2025
2539 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:43 am to
Who the hell is downvoting?

quote:

More money, with which we can help the poor, is bad because it rewards, instead of punishing, the wealthy.


Leftism is crazy.
Posted by KingOrange
Mayfair
Member since Aug 2018
11063 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:44 am to
Plants need C02. Who knew?
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 7:47 am
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
21383 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:46 am to
Always said....climate is the biggest political football ever! Huge money grab and the weather scares most of the sheep in this world, so they have a decent following....

Mother Nature is in charge, not you!
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
7226 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:49 am to
What’s crazy is- we do have an existential crisis on our hands and it’s not being addressed.

Watch Seaspiracy.
It’s excellent and well done. Actual scientific method at work.

But it’s a major problem and we aren’t even discussing it.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 7:50 am
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
14408 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:09 am to
There was a time when CO2 was higher and tropical types of forests were common in places like the SD area. It supported reptilian life cycles for dinosaurs. Imagine having fertile ground in regions that cannot sustain growth currently. That amount of CO2 would be horrible right
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
29729 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:37 am to
You mean they were wrong?

Like the return to the ice age in the 70’s

Acid rain and the hole in the Ozone layer in the 80’s

What else am I missing?
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
9483 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:43 am to
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
4990 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:49 am to
It’s almost as if nature had an ability to adjust.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
19230 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:58 am to
quote:

That alone ends the argument.
My “what will happen when the planet is 20-25 degrees warmer than now on average? Usually does it for me.

None of them know a thing about paleo climatology.
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
21887 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

someone with a respiratory illness getting oxygen.



if someone with respiratory illness gets oxygen, they might use their new mobility to walk out into traffic
Posted by Raz
Member since Oct 2006
7978 posts
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:05 am to
quote:

What’s crazy is- we do have an existential crisis on our hands and it’s not being addressed.



Coastal erosion
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram