- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Climate change swings and misses again
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:21 am
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:21 am
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:24 am to Night Vision
Hahahhahahha
I’ve been in these debates with the climate change clowns so many times.
They never know what the CURRENT CO2 level is…they have no clue what the optimum range is for humans and for plant life and that we are below it by 200-400ppm.
That alone ends the argument.
I’ve been in these debates with the climate change clowns so many times.
They never know what the CURRENT CO2 level is…they have no clue what the optimum range is for humans and for plant life and that we are below it by 200-400ppm.
That alone ends the argument.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:24 am to Night Vision
Wait til you learn about why the greening of the planet is ackshually a bad thing, lol.
quote:
While the "greening of the planet" might seem positive at first glance, it's considered problematic because it's primarily driven by rising carbon dioxide levels, which leads to several negative consequences including: reduced nutritional value in plants, potential disruption of ecosystems in drylands by increased vegetation, masking underlying environmental issues, and not addressing the root cause of climate change by simply increasing plant growth without tackling carbon emissions.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:27 am to Night Vision
Yes, but the lefties “built” the great green wall of Africa! That is what did this, not trees getting their necessary CO2!
This is tantamount to someone with a respiratory illness getting oxygen.
You know…what people need.
Net zero carbon emissions is a stupid policy, not based in
This is tantamount to someone with a respiratory illness getting oxygen.
You know…what people need.
Net zero carbon emissions is a stupid policy, not based in

Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:35 am to SallysHuman
quote:
and not addressing the root cause of climate change by simply increasing plant growth without tackling carbon emissions.
And there you have it. If the solution does not include punishing the human race, especially the wealthy parts, then it’s JUST NOT an acceptable solution.
The same thread runs through leftist thinking when discussing the Laffer Curve, which shows that, at certain levels of taxation, tax cuts yield MORE revenue. The Left used to argue that, even if that’s true, it’s bad. More money, with which we can help the poor, is bad because it rewards, instead of punishing, the wealthy.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:39 am to Night Vision
"Science deniers" keep eating, have the global warming/climate change freaks got a single one of these predictions correct yet?
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:43 am to Penrod
Who the hell is downvoting?
Leftism is crazy.
quote:
More money, with which we can help the poor, is bad because it rewards, instead of punishing, the wealthy.
Leftism is crazy.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:44 am to Night Vision
Plants need C02. Who knew?
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 7:47 am
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:46 am to Night Vision
Always said....climate is the biggest political football ever! Huge money grab and the weather scares most of the sheep in this world, so they have a decent following....
Mother Nature is in charge, not you!
Mother Nature is in charge, not you!
Posted on 3/6/25 at 7:49 am to oldskule
What’s crazy is- we do have an existential crisis on our hands and it’s not being addressed.
Watch Seaspiracy.
It’s excellent and well done. Actual scientific method at work.
But it’s a major problem and we aren’t even discussing it.
Watch Seaspiracy.
It’s excellent and well done. Actual scientific method at work.
But it’s a major problem and we aren’t even discussing it.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 7:50 am
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:09 am to Night Vision
There was a time when CO2 was higher and tropical types of forests were common in places like the SD area. It supported reptilian life cycles for dinosaurs. Imagine having fertile ground in regions that cannot sustain growth currently. That amount of CO2 would be horrible right
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:37 am to Night Vision
You mean they were wrong?
Like the return to the ice age in the 70’s
Acid rain and the hole in the Ozone layer in the 80’s
What else am I missing?
Like the return to the ice age in the 70’s
Acid rain and the hole in the Ozone layer in the 80’s
What else am I missing?
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:49 am to Night Vision
It’s almost as if nature had an ability to adjust.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 8:58 am to prplngldtigr
quote:My “what will happen when the planet is 20-25 degrees warmer than now on average? Usually does it for me.
That alone ends the argument.
None of them know a thing about paleo climatology.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:01 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
someone with a respiratory illness getting oxygen.
if someone with respiratory illness gets oxygen, they might use their new mobility to walk out into traffic
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:05 am to prplngldtigr
quote:
What’s crazy is- we do have an existential crisis on our hands and it’s not being addressed.
Coastal erosion
Popular
Back to top
