- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dems lawfare is picking up.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:27 am
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:27 am
They are trying to assume power via courts.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
16
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:28 am to Jjdoc
quote:
They are trying to assume power via courts.
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:28 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:29 am to Jjdoc
They are going to lose at every turn when it goes up to the higher courts.
Trump will win every single one of them.
Trump will win every single one of them.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
That had merit. These that the dems are doing are ridiculous. Common sense and moral integrity SFP. Try it for a change.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:30 am to Bunk Moreland
Hopefully SCOTUS strikes them down soon, prompting all of New England to leave the Union.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:31 am to Bunk Moreland
Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
Are you fricking retarded? Oh wait
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They are trying to assume power via courts. Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
A national vac mandate vs getting rid of one appointee are equivalents?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:35 am to Warboo
quote:
That had merit.
The lawfare prophecy of SFP has been fulfilled
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:35 am to Jjdoc
Trying to subvert the will of the people. I’m glad they are saving democracy. They haven’t had a real primary in a couple decades or won an actual election since Obama.
This is all stupid and a waste of time. Just get it to some sensible appeal court or scotus.
This is all stupid and a waste of time. Just get it to some sensible appeal court or scotus.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:36 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
A national vac mandate vs getting rid of one appointee are equivalents?
The difference has nothing to do with the words I quoted, which I'll quote again:
quote:
They are trying to assume power via courts
Do the courts have this power lawfully: yes or no? Op is arguing they do not. I am arguing they do (like with the vax mandate).
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:36 am to Jjdoc
Just so we define terms, lawfare:
>
But I welcome these cases. The Trump WH will eventually win these and his actions will be codified by the Executive and Judicial branches.
> But I welcome these cases. The Trump WH will eventually win these and his actions will be codified by the Executive and Judicial branches.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
Shut up you little socialist prick.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:37 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Shut up you little socialist prick.
I'm shocked that a person who misuses "lawfare" doesn't know what "socialist" means.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:37 am to Warboo
quote:
That had merit.
Ah yes the things I agree with are valid and anything else is meritless approach...
Luckily we have a court system to work out the actual merit or not. So if there's no merit to these then they'll be tossed outta court eventually.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:38 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Dems lawfare is picking up
By any means necessary.
No surprise.
I’d be shocked if the DJT team had not already well anticipated everything the Left is trying.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:38 am to GumboPot
quote:
Just so we define terms, lawfare:
This explains why people like OP are being told to use it to manipulate opinions of his peers, but I don't think that's how you intended to use it
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
No you are not. You are defending their actions.
And no, the Court does not have the authority to ignore the constitution and assume the power of the Executive Branch.
And no, the Court does not have the authority to ignore the constitution and assume the power of the Executive Branch.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Idiocy fulfilled lol
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News