- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Next will the courts disallow high school GPA’s and standardized scores to stand ?
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:01 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:01 am
Suppose a high school student athlete who did not qualify academically files a law suite against the NCAA on the grounds of discrimination because he did not qualify to play as a freshman .
19
Posted on 12/23/24 at 1:27 am to Mr Cell Phone
Those are the rules. If you don’t qualify. Hey, you can’t play. What’s next a player demands that a dunk be worth 3 points , because he thinks that should be the rules??
Rules are need to govern the game
Rules are need to govern the game
Posted on 12/23/24 at 2:55 am to MirrOlure
No rules apply it’s a free for all judges make decisions not the NCAA . The QB from Vanderbilt is a prime example now you may have a player 26 years old playing against an18 year old on a consistent basis .
Posted on 12/23/24 at 4:31 am to Mr Cell Phone
At least the ACT or SAT tests are the same or very similar across the country. The grades given are highly dependent on the quality of the school. All 4.0+ GPAs are not created equal.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 4:47 am to Mr Cell Phone
You dreamed up something hypothetical to get mad about.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 6:44 am to Superfluous Tiger
quote:Not really. The Pavia ruling makes anything possible
You dreamed up something hypothetical to get mad about.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 6:59 am to Mr Cell Phone
No.
I think the 4 year eligibility limit will soon be removed, but schools will still be allowed to set standards regarding admissions.
I think the 4 year eligibility limit will soon be removed, but schools will still be allowed to set standards regarding admissions.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:16 am to Mr Cell Phone
Discrimination based on what? There are rules and standards and they want a dumb down lawsuit. Ridiculous nonsense.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:21 am to Mr Cell Phone
They're still students and should be subject to the same requirements for admission.
Hint, for the most part they're not.
The attack will come to the extent the NCAAs eligibility standards to continue to play are different from the schools good standing requirements.
Hint, for the most part they're not.
The attack will come to the extent the NCAAs eligibility standards to continue to play are different from the schools good standing requirements.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:38 am to paulb52
quote:This hasn’t stopped some of the recent rulings.
Ridiculous nonsense.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:19 am to Mr Cell Phone
I’m sure we’re all aware of the flaws and biases of standardized tests.
- George Costanza
- George Costanza
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 8:20 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:24 am to MirrOlure
I think most people are missing the point of this thread. All of the other so called "rules" that have been around for decades have suddenly evaporated overnight, so at this point anything is on the table. Absolute clown world
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:24 am to OJsLifeCoach
They don’t need test scores anymore at D1 level
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:25 am to Mr Cell Phone
I honestly believe a player could challenge the 4 years of eligibility rule and win.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:34 am to lsupride87
quote:
The Pavia ruling makes anything possible
My understanding is that ruling specifically applied to junior college or NAIA schools which by definition are not part of NCAAs 3 divisions.
What is the big deal about this?
Were people not aware of 24 and 25 year olds playing NCAA sports already?
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:41 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
now you may have a player 26 years old playing against an18 year old on a consistent basis .
There has never been age restrictions for college athletics. Its about eligibility. S carolina had a 39yr old playing WR a several years back
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:44 am to Mr Cell Phone
There’s no constitutional protection from being discriminated against based on stupidity, but to your question, I’m sure some leftist think tank ( aka college law clinics) is working on the necessary subversive language to make the attempt, once the perfect leftist judge in the perfect leftist circuit is identified.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:18 am to PigDog33
quote:not ones that played 6 years of college
Were people not aware of 24 and 25 year olds playing NCAA sports already?
There will be multiple 35 year olds next year with over 6 yeses of college play
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:20 am to MirrOlure
Rules mean very little in today's version of the dis-United States.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:36 am to Mr Cell Phone
The Court's won't need to do it. It is only a matter of time before the only things connecting the university to the football team will be a licensing agreement for the logos and lease agreements for the facilities.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News