Ecumenism - Is it happening??

Catholics, what are your thoughts on the Bishop of Rome study 2024 that the Vatican approved a couple of months ago?
I read it as an optimistic Presbyterian who would love to see unity and communion.
It's astounding to see the Roman Catholic Church essentially saying We were wrong. The role of the pope during the second millennium was an unjustifiable departure from the period before the Great Schism (1054).

I'm sure many Catholics don't like this document, and that may be an understatement...But I don't know because I'm not Roman Catholic. So please tell me how you feel.

In short, it seems like the Church is attempting to totally reevaluate the way they interpret Vatican I, thus walking back the last 1,000 years of the evolution of the papacy.

quote:

---

Paragraph 56:
If Christian unity is one of the primary ‘necessities of the
Church’, how then can papal primacy be exercised to comply with
this necessity? What pertains to the order of de iure divino and what
can be considered contingent? “The ministry of unity also is
defined as ‘Petrine Ministry’. This ministry as an enduring element
in the church of Christ has found respect and living expression
since the earliest times. Nonetheless, in the course of history,
controversies arose over particular structures and forms of this
expression” (L–C Germ 2000, 153). Indeed, many ecumenical
problems, fears, or dissatisfactions are primarily linked to
contingent and therefore changeable features of papal primacy.
Some features of papal primacy, which originally responded to a
genuine need in a specific period of Church history, continued to
subsist, even after the reason for their origin had disappeared. “One
must further pose the question of whether and to what degree the
Roman Catholic Church fundamentally sees a possibility of a form
of communion of the non–Catholic churches with the pope, in
which the essence of the Petrine Ministry of unity is preserved, but
in canonical forms other than those that have been presented as
normative since the Middle Ages, and especially in the modern
period” (L–C Germ 2000, 200). The same is true for the extension
of papal primacy over various areas of Church life; historical
circumstances, which once justified a more or less far-reaching
extension of primacy in ecclesial matters, might have changed. It is
therefore “important to distinguish between the essence of a
ministry of primacy and any particular ways in which it has been or
is currently being exercised”

---

quote:

---

Paragraph 91: The Response recalls the words of the
then Cardinal Ratzinger: “As far as the doctrine of the primacy is
concerned, Rome must not require more of the East than was
formulated and lived during the first millennium”,
19 concluding,“such an approach offers considerable hope, and could make possible a fresh consideration of many matters in which churches
have developed in separation from one another” (54). The
Lutheran–Catholic dialogue in Germany also calls for “the
possibility of an orientation to the exercise of primacy in the first
Christian millennium without reference to later developments”

---

Full Study

I stumbled upon this document listening to this very helpful podcast by an Anglo-Catholic who many of the most relevant paragraphs. Spotify