- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why hasn’t the pace of the Ukraine Russia war change since the 60 billion?
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:37 am
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:37 am
I’ve still been keeping tabs nothing has changed. Russia is still on the same pace since Ukraine had critically low equipment. Ukraine is still losing land and Russia keeps adapting and getting stronger. What was the 60 billion supposed to do?
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:39 am to RaoulDuke504
It's not meant to change anything, it's meant to keep the money train rolling.
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:43 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:Line the pockets of criminals and help elect Dem politicians
What was the 60 billion supposed to do?
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:43 am to Biff Underwood
quote:
It's not meant to change anything, it's meant to keep the money train rolling.
This is the correct answer
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:43 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:
What was the 60 billion supposed to do
Wasn't supposed to do anything but enrich the rats in D.C.
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:48 am to RaoulDuke504
Got to subtract the 59 billion consultanting fee going to the in crowd 
Posted on 7/27/24 at 10:49 am to RaoulDuke504
The Nato proxy Ukraine army is fighting hard they are just running out of trained men and replacing them with poorly trained conscripts stretching the poorly rested and poorly equipped army further. Russia probes across the wide stretched front finding weak points and attacking those constantly switching the game plan taking what the proxy enemy gives them. Men, equipment, and foreign will, all being eroded as the Russian army continues to beef up both in man power and the evolution of equipment to better nato defenses. Russia will win the war it's just a matter of time when Ukraine admits being Natos puppet was a mistake and taps.
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:09 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
it's just a matter of time when Ukraine admits being Natos puppet was a mistake and taps.
Another two and half years perhaps?
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:16 am to doubleb
Perhaps, what's most important is that their will is broken so they arent lured back in by Nato once this war ends. However, it does seem like their will is breaking much sooner by the recent changes in Zelenskys tune. What will be interesting is after the Nato proxy war if Ukraine is able to stabilize or fall into a civil war for whatever left of New Ukraine.
This post was edited on 7/27/24 at 11:20 am
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:32 am to RaoulDuke504
Serious Question:
What's the most reliable source for determining the truth regarding the status of that war?
What's the most reliable source for determining the truth regarding the status of that war?
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:38 am to RaoulDuke504
Admin is slow rolling the supplies over. They don’t want Ukraine to lose but they don’t want them to win either……
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:46 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Serious Question: What's the most reliable source for determining the truth regarding the status of that war?
This sub in Reddit just lurk it leans pro Russian but in terms of losses, advancement, strikes, and comments on the ground it’s the best.
Also Julian Roepcke on X, he’s a German reporter who is pro Ukraine but honest about the state of the war.
LINK
On YouTube check out history legends best break downs
This post was edited on 7/27/24 at 11:48 am
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:48 am to RaoulDuke504
It's essentially a stalemate. The 60 billion we're giving Ukraine is not spent on tanks and planes to take territory back. That would be dangerous. They spend it on VERY expensive long range missiles and drones that can keep Russians hunkered down so lots of stuff blows up but very few soldiers die. The deaths occur when the soldiers make attacks. So they don't.
This could go on as long as America keeps buying them rockets.
This could go on as long as America keeps buying them rockets.
This post was edited on 7/27/24 at 11:49 am
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:48 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:
What was the 60 billion supposed to do?
You already know the answer.
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:48 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Russia will win the war
Yes but at what cost? They are just playing their usual game of throwing bodies at this, but they do not have the benefit of winter helping them. Not sure they have won many wars on their soil without the help of winter. Russia hasn't gained that much territory, and I have seen estimates of 70k casualty/kia in the past two months alone. The goal needs to be to bleed them dry so they do not decide to invade AGAIN as they have done maybe 7x. All breaks in warfare have just been a regrouping for Russia. If this war comes to an end there needs to be steps to stop Russia from invading for an 8th time
quote:
Serious Question:
What's the most reliable source for determining the truth regarding the status of that war?
Wrong place to ask this. Everyone is going to tell you to go to the place that agrees with their opinion
quote:
Admin is slow rolling the supplies over. They don’t want Ukraine to lose but they don’t want them to win either……
Correct. Bleed Russia dry slowly without threatening the state
quote:
The 60 billion we're giving Ukraine is not spent on tanks and planes to take territory back.
A huge chunk of that goes to the "MIC" You cannot just have munitions sitting on a shelf as they go bad eventually. In that case you either fire them off in training (not enough training calendar days for that), sell them, use them in a war, or pay Raytheon and such to dismantle them. What we are doing is sending over old shite and then restocking the shelves with new shite. In that formula Russia is the only one that suffers. Now for the real cool stuff like Patriots we get to show them off and countries like Poland start placing orders
This post was edited on 7/27/24 at 11:53 am
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:53 am to jmarto1
Russia's position for talks is that they keep what they have captured. Ukraine says 'No, because you'll go after more land later on.'
Russia's history on this hurts their position. Americans aren't sensitive to this but Europeans are.
Russia's history on this hurts their position. Americans aren't sensitive to this but Europeans are.
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:54 am to Zach
I agree with you on this . They have invaded several times so why let them regroup and retool? I get slammed on here but that is why I believe we need to let the Ukes kill as many Russians as they can
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:56 am to jmarto1
The Democrats desire to bleed us of money and put us so far into debt that "We the People" embrace socialism.
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:58 am to jmarto1
quote:
is why I believe we need to let the Ukes kill as many Russians as they can
Why do you say this so easily? What kind of hatred and coldness is in your heart to glibly talk about killing humans you have not been wronged by?
Posted on 7/27/24 at 11:59 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Ukraine admits being Natos puppet was a mistake and taps.
True. Via Obama/Nuland who started the whole conflict with their coup. Albeit Russia has always wanted the contested areas back wherein many of the citizens would prefer Russia over the Muh Democracy, corrupted US/Globalist version. Cost them big time, and we are on the chopping block for much the same.
Back to top

13








