- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Diet Soda beats water for Fat Loss- new 52 week study
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:24 am
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:24 am
Well i feel like pissing some people off today so figured would drop a couple new studies that have come out
First one tested if diet soda slowed fat loss....shocker it doesnt....but the shocker was people using diet soda lost more than those drinking only water. This was a 52 week study. SO TELL ME AGAIN HOW A ZERO CALORIE ENERGY DRINK IS KILLING ME AGAIN PLEASE??
Oh and dont bring up cancer, shite has been disproven 100 times over already.
Summary and images from Menno
LINK
discuss please
First one tested if diet soda slowed fat loss....shocker it doesnt....but the shocker was people using diet soda lost more than those drinking only water. This was a 52 week study. SO TELL ME AGAIN HOW A ZERO CALORIE ENERGY DRINK IS KILLING ME AGAIN PLEASE??
Oh and dont bring up cancer, shite has been disproven 100 times over already.
Summary and images from Menno
quote:
Artificial sweeteners have a bad rep, but is their notoriety grounded in science? A new year-long study with 262 participants compared consuming at least 2 glasses of water a day VS at least 2 glasses of diet soda a day. All participants were put on a 3-month weight loss program followed by 9 months of weight maintenance. Other than the water vs soda, their programs were identical.
The diet soda group lost significantly more weight. There were no any negative effects on their appetite or their bloodwork, including a wide panel of cardiometabolic health tests.
Worth noting is that the study was funded by the American Beverage Association, but they were not involved with the actual research. Moreover, the study data were audited by a third-party organisation (Biofortis) at the clinical site to validate their accuracy and integrity.
Most prior studies found water and diet sodas have the same effects on fat loss. In this study too, in a small subset of the participants who had DXA scans done, the difference between groups in fat loss was not statistically significant, although the soda group lost 1 kg more fat. While the effect isn't huge, this is not the first study to find an advantage in favor of low-calorie sweeteners.
The mechanism of the greater fat loss in these studies is almost certainly unrelated to any metabolic effects concerning energy expenditure. Rather, sweeteners can promote diet adherence by satisfying your sweet tooth without all the calories that otherwise often come with this. If sweeteners help you lose fat, which is incredibly healthy, they may even be net healthy for you.
LINK







discuss please
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:36 am to lsu777
My knee jerk reaction is that it’s probably at least somewhat attributable to the stimulant affect of the caffeine…
For me artificial sweeteners induce heart palpitations so I stay away from them at all costs.
For me artificial sweeteners induce heart palpitations so I stay away from them at all costs.
This post was edited on 6/6/24 at 11:38 am
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:40 am to BillyGibbons
quote:
My knee jerk reaction is that it’s probably at least somewhat attributable to the stimulant affect of the caffeine…
See I was going to guess less binging because you're still getting your sweet soda and don't feel tortured only drinking water. If you're used to it, switching to water only may make you crave sweets and you fall off your diet more easily. Or at least that's my assumption of why the diet soda group lost more.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:44 am to Ingeniero
quote:
See I was going to guess less binging because you're still getting your sweet soda and don't feel tortured only drinking water. If you're used to it, switching to water only may make you crave sweets and you fall off your diet more easily. Or at least that's my assumption of why the diet soda group lost more.
this is the correct answer. been multiple studies now showing diet soda beats water and its because it tends to solve the "sweat tooth" issue and tends to make people binge less
its not the caffeine though that certainly helps
key take away is its perfectly fine to use diet sodas and non calorie items to help keep you satisfied and a perfectly fine strategy and as a community we should stop vilifying it like its some kind of poison when its anything but.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 11:46 am to lsu777
question is....should i post this on the OT to stir up a hornets nest? or does someone want to do it 

Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:04 pm to lsu777
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:16 pm to lsu777
quote:
All participants were put on a 3-month weight loss program followed by 9 months of weight maintenance. Other than the water vs soda, their programs were identical
Saying the program is identical sounds like saying the diets were identical, other than the water vs soda.
But of course that would require some real explanation.
So we get this:
quote:
Rather, sweeteners can promote diet adherence by satisfying your sweet tooth without all the calories that otherwise often come with this.
So now it makes sense. The diet soda people were more compliant with the diet in general and so lost more fat.
What a shocker.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:19 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
So now it makes sense. The diet soda people were more compliant with the diet in general and so lost more fat.
What a shocker.
correct
nothing magical about diet soda. its not offering any health or metabolism benefits but it is allowing people to stay more complaint over the course of a year.
the point of the post was not to get people to think diet soda is better than water, its not, but it is a very good alternative to help one adhere to a diet in general and can help kill cravings
its just another tool in the tool box rather than the poison people try to make it out to be.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:22 pm to lsu777
Hey man, look at this study on the effectiveness of the pfizer vaccine against COVID. It's "100% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 95.3% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration"!
LINK to press release about study
LINK to press release about study
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:22 pm to lsu777
quote:
the point of the post was not to get people to think diet soda is better than water, its not, but it is a very good alternative to help one adhere to a diet in general and can help kill cravings its just another tool in the tool box rather than the poison people try to make it out to be.
It’s a great point, too.
Could be a real game changer I bet, because people love their diet sodas. Meaning I think it can take away some of the malaise that comes when people even think about dieting.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:24 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Hey man, look at this study on the effectiveness of the pfizer vaccine against COVID. It's "100% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 95.3% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration"!
is your stupid arse really trying to compare the covid vaccine to diet soda? one thing we had about 1 month of data on and the other we have decades of data on
shut the frick up with this dumb shite
if you have a point or something you can bring to the table that refute the study by all means, but dont post stupid arse pointless shite like that.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:38 pm to lsu777
I've pretty much lost all faith on 'studies' conducted in United States. Too much frickery goes on with them.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:44 pm to ronricks
quote:
I've pretty much lost all faith on 'studies' conducted in United States. Too much frickery goes on with them.


yall have gotten fricking stupid
unless it supports your opinion then...hey the study is flawed
jesus fricking christ.
read the damn data, its pretty clear. those that used diet soda, they were much more compliant overall on the diet over the year long study.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:46 pm to lsu777
quote:
is your stupid arse really trying to compare the covid vaccine to diet soda? one thing we had about 1 month of data on and the other we have decades of data on
shut the frick up with this dumb shite
if you have a point or something you can bring to the table that refute the study by all means, but dont post stupid arse pointless shite like that.

That being said, I very skeptical of studies like this that are funded by the very organizations that will benefit from favorable results.
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:47 pm to ronricks
I agree with Ron, that study brought to you by Coke. However, common sense tells me that diet soda satisfying a sweet tooth and helping someone adhere to a diet is probably true.
Before this thread turns into a slap fight, I’ve always looked at it as not letting perfect be the enemy of good. Diet sodas, reduced calorie Frankenfood is all better than being a giant fat arse stuffing their face with Oreos. Sure Whole Foods are better, with water only but we have to help get people started
ETA: I do appreciate 777 bringing the studies though.
Before this thread turns into a slap fight, I’ve always looked at it as not letting perfect be the enemy of good. Diet sodas, reduced calorie Frankenfood is all better than being a giant fat arse stuffing their face with Oreos. Sure Whole Foods are better, with water only but we have to help get people started
ETA: I do appreciate 777 bringing the studies though.
This post was edited on 6/6/24 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:54 pm to bamaguy17
quote:
I agree with Ron, that study brought to you by Coke
i put that it was paid for by them right in the first post.
doesnt change the results, they had no over sight on the data or the publishing or any part of the study
but its just common sense, adhering to the diet using non caloric measures to help....you will lose more bodyfat
we also know artificial sweeteners don't affect insulin sensitivity so its not going to slow things down in that regard
Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:56 pm to lsu777
quote:
they had no over sight on the data or the publishing or any part of the study

Posted on 6/6/24 at 12:59 pm to Mo Jeaux
this isnt some ground breaking study numbnuts. its just the latest in atleast half a dozen that show this
but as usual, you have no proof and you just have a feeling right?
but as usual, you have no proof and you just have a feeling right?
Posted on 6/6/24 at 1:01 pm to lsu777
Do Diet Coke and Coke Zero make anyone else feel like they have a UTI? Is that just me?
This post was edited on 6/6/24 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 6/6/24 at 1:05 pm to lsu777
Would you fricking relax, Susan. Why are you taking this so personally?
I'm not trying to prove anything, other than the fact that the study itself is coming out of a huge conflict of interest due to the organization funding it. To state equivocally that they had no oversight or role in publishing the study is laughable at best.
I'm not trying to prove anything, other than the fact that the study itself is coming out of a huge conflict of interest due to the organization funding it. To state equivocally that they had no oversight or role in publishing the study is laughable at best.
Popular
Back to top
