I expect a guilty verdict.

You and everyone else

Bought and paid for before it started

I think Trump wants a guilty verdict.

This could possibly be the biggest FAFO moment in recent history.

I'll be waiting for the gifs.

And if you sincerely think that the only plausible explanation would be what, exactly?

quote:

---

If a guilty verdict is returned, on what grounds will an appeal be made?

---

Seems like there is a lot of reversible error in this trial. The whole thing is a farce. They just want to tag Trump as a felon and maybe even try to jail him in an election year.

quote:

---

And if you sincerely think that the only plausible explanation would be what, exactly?

---

It provides Trump with the “proof” that the deep state and democrats are out to get him and that he is the outsider victim. That’s the very core of his campaigning. If he is not convicted, then there is fairness in the system and only a few bad apples out there picking on him. If he is convicted in New York on this charge, he can beat that drum relentlessly until the election. It will add a measure of truth to his claims of victim hood.

But not all jurors are from NY. Without knowing enough, but going with the basics, I'm thinking the I.T. guy from NC may not be a total hater. Now if he's a gay tranny then that would change my opinion. The lawyers may have more integrity than this board lawyers and may respect the profession enough to not want to degrade it in the way this judge has allowed. Unless there is fear they will have to be in his court one day.

The fear factor for getting doxxed is an unknown too.

Legit jurors, NYC or not, looking at it right would not find him guilty.

They should just take a vote from the start and ask who thinks he guilty of them all, if so they should just knock it out quickly and get out of there by EOW.

I don't think anyone willing to say no on them all from the get go will be convinced otherwise so just don't waste time, so another by EOW situation.

If this goes into next week still then I'm thinking they are trying to find just one guilty to agree on.

Just takes one to delay it all and won't hear of it again as it's just attempted election interference anyway

agree, after hearing the multiple ways you can decide to rule even if its the sum or a percentage of a part of another part of the lack of evidence, you can then choose to agree on the part of the group of parts to find him guilty.