- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Opponents to ask for rehearing in St. George matter
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:19 am
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:19 am
WAFB
The regime simply cannot allow St. George to happen. They know how royally F*CKed they will be and they did it to themselves.
quote:
Mary Olive Piersen
quote:
Pierson says the request will include multiple issues for the state’s highest court to reconsider. She did not elaborate on what those issues are.
The regime simply cannot allow St. George to happen. They know how royally F*CKed they will be and they did it to themselves.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:22 am to tharre4
It'll be denied 4-3. Nobody is changing their minds.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:22 am to tharre4
The NAACP telegraphed their lawsuit a few days ago.
Once LASC denies this rehearing, I expect the NAACP one to be filed in federal court immediately thereafter.
Once LASC denies this rehearing, I expect the NAACP one to be filed in federal court immediately thereafter.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:24 am to tharre4
quote:Let's cut to the chase: 1) exposing a cancerous culture and 2) underestimating what you can REALLY do in a free society.
She did not elaborate on what those issues are.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:26 am to tharre4
I don’t get the naacp’s claim here. Black people, and other people of color, live in what will be St. George. Are they really going to try to argue that St. George is bad for people living north of Florida Blvd?
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:33 am to tharre4
The people have spoken. It's time the haters stop trying to overturn democracy.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The NAACP telegraphed their lawsuit a few days ago.
Once LASC denies this rehearing, I expect the NAACP one to be filed in federal court immediately thereafter.
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter? Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 7:34 am
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:38 am to Bard
quote:
Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
Those sorts of reasonings. I imagine they'll try to file for a TRO and halt everything for a few months prior to that trial.
There is also the litigation that will occur about the annexed property post-election. They ma
I'm not saying these suits will win, but they can delay things for 5-10 years.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:39 am to tharre4
Maybe it is just me but aren’t the plaintiffs supposed to lay out everything in the original case in order to preserve everything upon appeal?
What MOP is trying to push is that the court didn’t address XYZ and now wants to do that, but I think the whole argument by then was “This is null so it doesn’t matter what happens if it actually gets upheld.”
What MOP is trying to push is that the court didn’t address XYZ and now wants to do that, but I think the whole argument by then was “This is null so it doesn’t matter what happens if it actually gets upheld.”
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:01 am to tharre4
If you are a St George resident and you are serious about the ultimate issue of having a school district the thing to do in my opinion is to migrate en masse to a neighboring Parish. Let RE prices in St George crash due to inventory. Strip the Parish of its funding. This will go on for many years just to have the city officially exist. The school district is an entirely different matter. In reality this will never happen. Life is too easy. St George residents will still vote at a clip high enough for SWB to go back in. Or Ted James which would be worse. You get the government you vote for. You get the government Lipsey, Engquist etc told you to vote for.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:03 am to Bard
quote:
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter? Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
Challenge to the City is arguably barred.
NAACP's gripe is about the potential new school district and they will likely find a receptive audience in federal court for the because God forbid a federal court not stick its fricking nose into local education issues.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
What would happen if Broome, the NAACP, and MOP and her ilk launched an all out war against their real enemy; the thugs, gangs, drug dealers, and culture that is prevalent in large parts of BR that is causing much of the decay instead of these non stop attacks on all the good folks who do not want to be a part of what BR is becoming?
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 8:13 am
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:09 am to udtiger
Judge Parker is sitting next to Satan with a smirk on his drunken face.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:09 am to tharre4
St George stacked, BR fracked!
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:11 am to doubleb
quote:
What would happen if Broome, the NAACP, and MOP and her ilk launched an all out war against their real enemy; the thugs, gangs, drug dealers, and culture that is prevalent in large parts of BR that is causing much of the decay instead of these non stop attacks in all the good folks who do not want to be a part of what BR is becoming?
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:12 am to udtiger
Correct.
There’s no way they went that far in the ruling and are turning back.
There’s no way they went that far in the ruling and are turning back.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:13 am to Icansee4miles
quote:
Icansee4miles
Judge Parker is sitting next to Satan with a smirk on his drunken face.
frick that worthless sack of shite.
He set BR on its path to decline and Katrina poured gasoline on it.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:14 am to rmc
quote:
If you are a St George resident and you are serious about the ultimate issue of having a school district the thing to do in my opinion is to migrate en masse to a neighboring Parish
They have been doing this for a couple of decades.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:19 am to teke184
quote:
What MOP is trying to push is that the court didn’t address XYZ and now wants to do that, but I think the whole argument by then was “This is null so it doesn’t matter what happens if it actually gets upheld.”
I loath the bitch, but her argument is that because the Court took the next step of declaring the incorporation valid and can move forward, that did not address some extant issue attendant to incorporation.
As for the boundaries, that's set forth in the petition and the annexation post petition are subject to a pending lawsuit in the 19th (it was stayed in 2022 pending the outcome of the challenge to the incorporation itself).
As a basis for rehearing, it should be rejected because it wasn't raised by the challengers (if...then) and because there's pending litigation in the lower courts.
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 8:20 am
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but they can delay things for 5-10 years.
The problem with our freaking country. Litigation and lawyers.
The reason nothing ever gets done in a timely manner.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News