- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is there anyone who actually thinks that OJ is innocent?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:27 pm
I was a toddler during the trial, so obviously I have no memories. But from reading anything online, I don't think I've ever seen a single person who thinks that he is innocent. Even in real life, I haven't talked to a single person who thinks he is innocent(and I'm black).
Besides the whole glove thing, what was it exactly that the defense team used to get him off?
Besides the whole glove thing, what was it exactly that the defense team used to get him off?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:28 pm to QJenk
The black community thinks he was innocenet - or at least, deserving to be left off to get a win.
I was a kid...this was the first major event I remember from my childhood.
I was a kid...this was the first major event I remember from my childhood.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:29 pm to QJenk
OJ did it... That circus show of a trial was a joke...
There was blood all on the inside of his Bronco..
There was blood all on the inside of his Bronco..
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:29 pm to QJenk
Me
LINK
LINK
quote:
OJ Simpson didn't kill Nicole and Ron. It was his son, Jason.
Jason was a sous chef. He quite literally had a set of knives on him that very night.
Jason had a punch out ticket to clock out at work. But that night he didn't use it. His time that he left was written in for the first time ever. This means no one knows when he actually really left.
Jason lied about his whereabouts and said he was with his girlfriend. It later came out during the civil deposition that he had lied. He then claimed he was home alone after work. He had absolutely no alibi for the time of the murders. None. When this line of questioning took place, Jason got very nervous and the lawyer asked what was going on, and they immediately took a break. Came back from break and this line of questioning was not revisited.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:29 pm to QJenk
If the glove dont fit, you must acquit!!
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:32 pm to JodyPlauche
What would have been his motive?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:33 pm to QJenk
You’d have to be missing chromosomes to think OJ didn’t whack them
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:33 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
Me
How did OJ's shoe prints get to the scene? Did he go there after the fact?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:34 pm to QJenk
Turned into a larger racism/civil rights issue and people big mad at corrupt LAPD.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:38 pm to QJenk
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:40 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
OJs son did it
Nope. OJ did it and basically confessed to it in the book he wrote and during an interview with a Fox News reporter.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:43 pm to QJenk
quote:
Besides the whole glove thing, what was it exactly that the defense team used to get him off?
DNA evidence wasn't as advanced or well-known by the populous at the time, so the defense spent a lot of time trying to cast doubt over the whole process, potential contamination, validity of the science, brought in a ton of other experts to cast doubt on the methods.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:43 pm to QJenk
OJ had a damn good defense team. The LAPD made a good bit of procedural errors. So did the DA. The DNA technology they used was still new and the defense was able to plant the seed of doubt in the jurors.
Most important, this trial occurred a few years from the Rodney King beating and LA riots. People still didn't trust the LAPD. It didn't help that one of the investigators, Mark Fuhrman turned out to be a racist.
Fuhrman, during his investigation actually found blood in OJ's Bronco, and before that was aware of OJ's domestic violence issues but that didn't matter because the defense focused on his racist language in the past.
Once that seed was planted, it was over.
Most important, this trial occurred a few years from the Rodney King beating and LA riots. People still didn't trust the LAPD. It didn't help that one of the investigators, Mark Fuhrman turned out to be a racist.
Fuhrman, during his investigation actually found blood in OJ's Bronco, and before that was aware of OJ's domestic violence issues but that didn't matter because the defense focused on his racist language in the past.
Once that seed was planted, it was over.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:44 pm to QJenk
Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:45 pm to QJenk
I remember my mother talking about how everyone white at work was in shock and disbelief the rest of the day and everyone that was black was cheering and in great spirits. I'm simply stating facts, not any opinion.
You can watch reaction videos from that day in places like NYC, and it fully corroborates that.
You can watch reaction videos from that day in places like NYC, and it fully corroborates that.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:54 pm to QJenk
Back when the trial was going on, I was 100% OJ did it.....then I read something about the son doing it and figured a son may be the only person on Earth you would risk going to prison for....these days I am 60% OJ and 40% son
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:03 pm to QJenk
quote:It's quite simple really.
Besides the whole glove thing, what was it exactly that the defense team used to get him off?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:03 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
How did OJ's shoe prints get to the scene? Did he go there after the fact?
I might be remembering it incorrectly, but I think the shoe print wasn't determined to be OJ's until the civil trial. Yes, they had the imprint and approximate size, and they knew it was a Bruno Magli shoe but they couldn't connect them to OJ.
It was the civil trial that found the picture of OJ wearing Bruno Magli shoes.
Again, it's been 30 years.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News