- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kate Middleton diagnosed with cancer
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:42 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:42 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I actually meant Russ was a future HOFer
He's borderline.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:45 pm to blueboy
Best wishes to Kate. Hopefully she can take the time she needs to heal privately
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:46 pm to BZ504
quote:
Anyone think this could be vaccine related?
Posted on 3/22/24 at 10:57 pm to blueboy
She's a rare ray of sunshine in a dark world. Hope she makes a full recovery.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 11:05 pm to JasonDBlaha
You mean anyone who follows A&M and their Middle East money train
Posted on 3/23/24 at 5:09 am to Oates Mustache
quote:
The Queen, at one point, could use emergency powers to completely dissolve parliament and have it reseated. The monarchy still possesses some powers, though it's limited to what's drawn up by parliament. Like I said, it's confusing as hell and I'm not fully up to date on the monarchy's current power
The monarchy haven't dismissed a law in over a hundred years, their role and powers are purely symbolic. If Charles just dissolved parliament on a whim then that would be the end of it.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 5:21 am to Corinthians420
quote:
yeah, the vaccine prevents cancer
By killing people before they have a chance to develop it?
Posted on 3/23/24 at 5:29 am to engvol
The monarchy exists now for tourism, not governing
Posted on 3/23/24 at 5:48 am to BabyTac
quote:
Meantime 98% of the world could give two shits.
You can only give two shits?
Posted on 3/23/24 at 8:33 am to dgnx6
Why do a thousand people feel compelled to come to a thread they insist they don't care about to post that they don't care about it?
Posted on 3/23/24 at 10:47 am to Gotabyte
quote:if you understood the truth, it would make perfect sense.
Sad someone like that gets cancer when Pelosi and Schumer deserve it.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 10:52 am to TygerLyfe
Because they want attention
Posted on 3/23/24 at 11:26 am to blueboy
quote:
Kate Middleton diagnosed with cancer
She's dropped pound or two.
Wood.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 12:16 pm to TygerLyfe
quote:
Why do a thousand people feel compelled to come to a thread they insist they don't care about to post that they don't care about it?
Because they erroneously believe people care about their opinion. It always makes me laugh at them because they look so darn silly contrary to their beliefs about themselves and their posts.
I hope Kate recovers for her sake and her family's.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 1:04 pm to MardiGrasCajun
quote:
Then I'll attempt to educate you. In 1990 the world population was 5,300,000,000 people. In 2019 the world population was over 7,700,000,000. In 1990, there was 1.82 million cases of early-onset cancer. In 2019 there was 3.26 million cases. This was prior to any covid-19 shot. So, had you responded to this thread in 2019, you'd said, "it's crazy how common cancer is becoming in young people". That's a huge increase in cases however it's also a huge increase in population.
So based on that increase in population, we would have expected 2.64 million cases in 2019, rather than 3.26 million cases. Granted, maybe there were also probably more cases detected in 2019 due to improved technology. But the change was greater than expected based solely on population increase.
This post was edited on 3/23/24 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 3/23/24 at 1:42 pm to blueboy
She seems like a great person. Hopefully she beats it.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 1:53 pm to Tupelo
quote:
So based on that increase in population, we would have expected 2.64 million cases in 2019, rather than 3.26 million cases. Granted, maybe there were also probably more cases detected in 2019 due to improved technology. But the change was greater than expected based solely on population increase.
The only population number that matters when talking about early cancer are people young enough to get early cancer. Total population is irrelevant, only the population of young people matters. And of course if you have a population boom the increase in percentage of young people is going to be dramatically higher than the percent of total population growth.
This post was edited on 3/23/24 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 3/23/24 at 1:56 pm to NewOrleansBlend
But the advancement in cancer treatment is huge ftom just ten years ago.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:06 pm to blueboy
Some chick in England has cancer..Oh well.
Posted on 3/23/24 at 3:10 pm to LarryCLE
quote:Fair enough and point taken.
You know what’s just as annoying/uninteresting as the royals? People who feel the constant need to tell all of us how little they care about the royals.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News