- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:21 am to WPBTiger
"What do you mean...we have to give him a fair trial?"
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:22 am to WPBTiger
So what are the secret files? The DOJ NSD trying to unseat a sitting President? Nuclear Codes? Dumbassed Milley's dumbassed plans for anything?
The President is over the DoD and Milley so Trump could declassify Milley's call with the CCP saying Milley would warn China over the President.
The President is over the DoD and Milley so Trump could declassify Milley's call with the CCP saying Milley would warn China over the President.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
"Crossfire Hurricane" stuff is a MAGA echo chamber meme
please go on - tell us what "Crossfire Hurricane" really is - be as specific as you can be.
And be sure to fully describe its relationship with, or irrelevancy from, the
!!! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA !! hoax.
tia.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:23 am to GumboPot
You mean like the National Security documents Joe has strewn all over his garage floor? Like those?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:29 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Well, to be fair, at his age Trump may, in fact, have some memory issues, and that is no sin, but Trump could never be called "sympathetic".
C’mon, man. Neither could Joe.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:33 am to HubbaBubba
It is mind-blowing that no one was held accountable for the Afghanistan withdrawal, Bowe Bergdahl, Obama's Iran deal and so on...
Why wasn't anything done to stop Obama and HRC when they gaslit Cairo and placed a muslim brotherhood presidente' that murdered Christians, burnt Churches, relics? It was so bad that Egypt sentenced Obama's puppet to life in prison.
They said they wanted a color revolution, so sad....ya know...they just want to change the world with global marxism..
Why wasn't anything done to stop Obama and HRC when they gaslit Cairo and placed a muslim brotherhood presidente' that murdered Christians, burnt Churches, relics? It was so bad that Egypt sentenced Obama's puppet to life in prison.
They said they wanted a color revolution, so sad....ya know...they just want to change the world with global marxism..
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:40 am to OceanMan
quote:
So the only way to convict him for having documents so secret that nobody should see, is to show people those documents.
It is kind of like the perfect crime, except this was the perfect prosecution, which is prosecuting with evidence no one can see. "Trust us, it is bad stuff". Judge Canon won't go along with this BS.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:40 am to WPBTiger
If Jack Smith shows classified documents to jurors that don't have the proper clearance, wouldn't he be in violation of the espionage act?
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:45 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
Lmao. Jury duty should never lead to 1984 style surveillance.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:48 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
If Jack Smith shows classified documents to jurors that don't have the proper clearance, wouldn't he be in violation of the espionage act?
I suppose you COULD seat an impartial jury that could pass all the background checks necessary for the appropriate security clearance, but do you have any idea how LONG that would take?
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 9:49 am
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:51 am to Godfather1
quote:
I suppose you COULD seat an impartial jury that could pass all the background checks necessary for the appropriate security clearance, but do you have any idea how LONG that would take?
You can probably find some ex-military that have clearance. Jack Smith probably wouldn't like that though.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 9:54 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
If Jack Smith shows classified documents to jurors that don't have the proper clearance, wouldn't he be in violation of the espionage act?
Does she have Jack in a trap?
If he divulges the national security documents to the jury does he compromise national security (he doesn't)?
If he does not divulge the documents to the jury does he violate the defendants 4 amendment rights?
Jack may drop the case to avoid divulging national security documents to the jury unless Jack does an interlocutory appeal and the 11 circuit rebuffs Judge Cannon or takes her off the case.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:maybe they can joetato's ghostwriter to do it
The documents can be authenticated via other means, though.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:06 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Not really, they’ve got to show them incredibly redacted docs that look like:
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
SPECIAL BRIEFING
NATIONAL SECURITY BRIEF
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXorangeXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXmanXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXbadXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Meaux, thats exactly what the misses said.
But if it cant be read you cant be judged, so if the glove dont fit ya must acquit.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:07 am to TBoy
quote:
Show them to the jurors under controlled circumstances. That isn’t terribly difficult. But they should also monitor the jurors to see if they have any improper contacts with outside agents. Advise the jurors that all of this is going on, and get on with it.
You're using common sense but still being down voted. This seems to be exactly what the judge is saying. It appears that the government prosecutor doesn't want this, which means the documents aren't nearly as bad as they want us to think they are. Jack is just being your typical scummy lawyer who knows he has no case.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A jury doesn't get to demand to see video of a surgery to make a determination that surgical medical records reflect what occurred. The doctor testifies to that
So in this example would Fauci be the expert?????????
They are intel documents, maybe the 17 intel agencies or the 51 former employees???????
Thats why you have a jury of your peers, surely you arent that obtuse.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:15 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
please go on - tell us what "Crossfire Hurricane" really is - be as specific as you can be.
And be sure to fully describe its relationship with, or irrelevancy from, the
!!! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA !! hoax.
tia.
Don't hold your breath...
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:55 am to WPBTiger
At least there's one fair judge left in America.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 11:14 am to Dirk Dawgler
Judge Cannon may soon have an unfortunate, fatal accident? Hope I'm wrong.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News