Started By
Message

re: ‘Certainly intimidation’: Louisiana sues EPA for emails of journalists and ‘Cancer Alley’

Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:49 am to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50359 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:49 am to
quote:

The reality is, people who live near plants tend to be very poor, because the only people who live there are those who cannot afford to live anywhere else


Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power. Blacks didn’t flock to live near refineries.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140689 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power


Or, stick with me here, they put them in areas where land was cheap.

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118977 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power.


They build where land is cheap and resources are available. Sometimes but not always that is adjacent to majority black neighborhoods. Refining companies are not targeting black neighborhoods. In fact Shell refinery in Norco comes to mind as a refinery adjacent to a white neighborhood.
Posted by bayouh2o
Arizona
Member since Sep 2006
904 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power. Blacks didn’t flock to live near refineries.


The Exxon Plant in Baton Rouge was built in the early 1900's near the Old Bridge. It is my understanding that that was a mostly white population during that time (I know in the 70's we would go visit my Aunt in what is now North Baton Rouge) and that they built the Plants there because that was near where the workforce (mostly white men coming back from WWI and WWII) were settling. It was the expansion of the city and white flight that left all of the houses in North Baton Rouge open and then the black folks moved in the area because land and rent was cheaper.

If this is the case, then the blacks did, in fact, kind of flock to the area to live near the refineries.

At least, that is what I think happened, someone please correct me if I am wrong.



Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29224 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:21 pm to
Of all the outrageous BS you’ve posted, this might be the worst. The manufacturing sites were mostly built on sites that had formerly been plantations (many companies have preserved these homes on their sites), because it was high ground with river access, and large tracts of land where purchase only involved one, or a few, landowners.

The Exxon Baton Rouge refinery was built in 1909, all the houses around it were workers at the refinery that could walk to work. There are plenty of pictures from back in the day, please circle any minorities you find in any of them. As people became more mobile, they moved to newer, larger homes out in the suburbs.

The minorities that purchased those homes decades later knew they were buying next to a manufacturing site, and the homes were priced accordingly. The chicken came generations before the egg here.

You are completely FOS. You should take the L and leave this thread before you come out with something even more moronic.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67196 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power. Blacks didn’t flock to live near refineries.


Plants and factories are built on the riveralong certain locations where the currents aren’t a strain on docking ocean-going ships. (Cut banks vs deposit banks)

The proximity of African Americans is because many plantations once lined the river for the same reason, and many freed slaves settled adjacent to the plantations where they were once enslaved.
The same attributes which made the land valuable for cash crop cultivation also made it ideal for large manufacturing facilities.

It’s not racism. It’s geography. The oldest plants are in the most ideal locations for ships. Many historic plantations were purchased and moved, torn down, or mysteriously “burned” to make way for plant facilities.

Just because something negatively impacts an African American community doesn’t mean it’s rooted in racism.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power. Blacks didn’t flock to live near refineries.



Because of this post, all of your other posts, and the fact that you have sex with homeless people.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26620 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power. Blacks didn’t flock to live near refineries

Good god this is extraordinarily stupid. These plants largely predate the population that lives around them.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7350 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Plants and factories were built in/near black communities because white people didn’t want them near their neighborhoods and black had/have no power. Blacks didn’t flock to live near refineries.


Those communities were white when those plants were built.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram