Started By
Message

re: CWD detections by Parish.

Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:29 pm to
Posted by mtb010
San Antonio
Member since Sep 2009
4432 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Surely I do not need to explain the difference...


It's transmittable through saliva, is it not? Then that means it will be transmissible wherever multiple deer feed, scent check on a scrape, use the same licking branch, etc. So, whether you quit feeding or not it will exist and it will still be transmissible. I just don't like the feds fricking with every aspect of my life, besides take a look at the areas hit the hardest. Illinois, illegal to bait, Iowa, illegal to bait, Wisconsin, illegal to bait, etc.
Posted by bigolecatfish
God's Country
Member since Jan 2007
1314 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

with all of the known stuff that Glyphosate causes nothing would surprise me.


Dead weeds and less erosion?
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
26563 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Ah well frick it then let's just not do shite. Yolo.


I don't know about all that. But I do know the government sure as hell doesn't know what to do. Especially the one in Louisiana.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

just don't like the feds fricking with every aspect of my life


Me either. We should do it ourselves, or the state should. I believe the "law" is that the deer are the states property.

quote:

So, whether you quit feeding or not it will exist and it will still be transmissible


Of course, but having the whole herd eating out of the same 12" circle all ywlear is much different than a few bucks licking a branch in the rut.
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
26563 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

I believe the "law" is that the deer are the states property.


Not to sidetrack the thread and its been said on here before, but I love that idea and how its implemented. The State tells me when I can and cannot hunt it. They exert control over it. Claim its the state's property. But when it comes in front of my truck on Highway 61 and I plow through it they sure aren't paying the bill.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

the government sure as hell doesn't know what to do. Especially the one in Louisiana.


I dont disagree. Unfortunately for all of us I am not the crowned dictator of Louisiana.
Posted by mtb010
San Antonio
Member since Sep 2009
4432 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Of course, but having the whole herd eating out of the same 12" circle all ywlear is much different than a few bucks licking a branch in the rut


Then explain why the mid-west states and the central US have the highest rates and do not and have not allowed baiting ever? There were cases in West Texas and everybody and their momma baits in Texas and you don't see it prevalent in Texas.
Posted by MobileJosh
On the go
Member since May 2018
1065 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Then explain why the mid-west states and the central US have the highest rates and do not and have not allowed baiting ever? There were cases in West Texas and everybody and their momma baits in Texas and you don't see it prevalent in Texas.


Dude, his epidemiology degree only covers the corn piles on the "big private clubs" on the Mississippi river. The clubs where everyone feeds corn in 12" circles.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 3:52 pm
Posted by Duckhammer_77
TD Platinum member
Member since Nov 2016
2698 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

stopped baiting on our own a couple years back, and we killed more mature bucks the following season.

same with our place, we expanded every food plot we had. Increased seed density, planted soybeans in the spring for the summer plots. Drought aside, it has been a success. We see more deer and more variety of deer all season long. They move around a lot more. No longer the same old doe and two yearlings, every day, roll out of bed at 7:15, face-dive the corn pile, and walk off to take a nap.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 5:52 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95969 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 7:16 pm to
Didn’t CWD explode and spread from states that always had illegal baiting laws? If so, seems like that really doesn’t make a difference
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 7:17 pm
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14068 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Didn’t CWD explode and spread from states that always had illegal baiting laws? If so, seems like that really doesn’t make a difference
there are a few linked documents on LDWF website that give a history. As I recall, it was first detected in captive mule deer in CO in the 1960s. Captivity seems to make CWD manifest. Seems banning deer pens and breeding ops would’ve been paramount, but so much for that idea.
Posted by meauxjeaux77
south louisiana
Member since Feb 2012
88 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:45 pm to
KEEP THE BAN

Posted by mrcoon
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2019
536 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Maybe so. Maybe not. The reality is you don't know where the frick it came from nor how to stop it. Neither do the greatest Epidemiologist in the world. It's just a big guessing game.


It is a CYA game. CWD is scrapie. CWD got into deer in the 60's in CO when they penned up mule deer with scrapie infected sheep. It jumped to the deer and the rest is history.
Posted by deltafarmer
Member since Dec 2019
515 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:22 am to
I just checked a map of the entire U.S. where CWD has been found. There are millions of acres of agricultural/rural, the vast majority of land actually, where CWD has not been found. Virtually all ag land is treated with glyphosate at least once during a growing season. If glyphosate causes CWD wouldn’t there be more ag areas dealing with CWD?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:40 am to
I dont have the answer for that. It "originated" out there. I think someone mentioned earlier that baiting wasn't outlawed until the 90's. I suspect it just had a head start, and there's very heavy focus on testing as well.

I do know that feeding deer out of a pile is conducive to spreading disease, and CWD is expected to be transmittable via saliva. There's no benefit to baiting deer for anybody. Its a really easy and non-impactful way to improve the situation.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

MobileJosh


You're the worst kind of dumbass - an arrogant one.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14068 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:52 am to
quote:

You're the worst kind of dumbass - an arrogant one.
He’s the baw who was covering arse for his WQ bros; you know, WQ, where CWD magically fell from the sky.
Posted by Sparetime
Lookin down at La
Member since Sep 2014
908 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I'd like to see them open it up. With the drought this year and food plots not coming up proper, Freeze from couple weeks ago, the deer could use some protein right about now..


This. Helluva year to start the ban. Our deer are so poor that fawn mortality could be 80% or higher. No browse and very little mass crop.

And before I get told, we plant a super heavy mix and ferilized mid season on every open spot we could this year...... looks like a putting green.

So we may starve our herd instead of saving it.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81759 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:08 am to
quote:

with all of the known stuff that Glyphosate causes
List please.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14068 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:20 am to
quote:

So we may starve our herd instead of saving it.
One way or another, they’ll be ok.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram