- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU still needs an OC
Posted on 1/6/24 at 7:57 am to Ellis_Hugh
Posted on 1/6/24 at 7:57 am to Ellis_Hugh
quote:
Surely, he isn’t waiting. It’s just strange that the first page is all DC talk.
You understand this board is not real life, correct? Just because it's not the main topic here, doesn't mean it's not Kelly's main topic.
1
Posted on 1/6/24 at 7:59 am to Legendary Number 9
quote:
Sloan needs to pass his recruiting exam tomorrow at 4:30pm. Then the job is his.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:02 am to Legendary Number 9
quote:
Sloan needs to pass his recruiting exam tomorrow at 4:30pm. Then the job is his.
means nothing until it is binding
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:09 am to Ellis_Hugh
Sloan is already on staff. Fine if hankton is named co oc.
Both have done a great job and deserve promotions.
Both have done a great job and deserve promotions.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:10 am to Legendary Number 9
What exactly is a recruiting exam?
ETA I know keeping Sloan is key for getting Bryce, but I hope we retain Hankton as well. There's been no drop off on WRU, and I think you can attribute the monster season BTJ had to his tutelage.
ETA I know keeping Sloan is key for getting Bryce, but I hope we retain Hankton as well. There's been no drop off on WRU, and I think you can attribute the monster season BTJ had to his tutelage.
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 8:12 am
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:14 am to Lester Earl
quote:
means nothing until it is binding
Bet it means something to BK if he picks another school today, binding or not
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:16 am to CynicalTiger08
“We” as in fans and posters here. Jesus, some of you are so gd dumb and believe that you are actually a part of these processes.
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 8:19 am
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:18 am to Handsome Pete
quote:
Bet it means something to BK if he picks another school today, binding or not
Yes I’m sure that Brian Kelly is going to ignore all the other recruits he secured, ignore his play calling in the bowl, ignore his development of Daniels , ignore the continuity with nussmeir and change his mind because an 18 year old who lives in Michigan doesn’t end up in Baton Rouge
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:24 am to Handsome Pete
quote:
Bet it means something to BK if he picks another school today, binding or not
Of course it does. But you don’t give someone a job because of it.
They need to find a way to give Sloan a raise & promotion without making him OC. Assistant HC & QB coach / run game coordinator or something of the sort
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:25 am to Lester Earl
What’s your OC shortlist les
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:25 am to Adam Banks
quote:
Yes I’m sure that Brian Kelly is going to ignore all the other recruits he secured
Which were?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:34 am to S
Here's the top 20 offenses in college football this season. Whose OC would we want to poach that is realistic?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:39 am to Lester Earl
I love that Adam thinks we should hire Sloan even if Underwood doesn't commit to us, and Lester thinks we shouldn't hire him even if he does. Both y'all doing some mental gymnastics.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:41 am to Handsome Pete
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:43 am to Handsome Pete
quote:
I love that Adam thinks we should hire Sloan even if Underwood doesn't commit to us, and Lester thinks we shouldn't hire him even if he does.
So two different people can’t have different opinions?
Call me crazy but I think basing the decision for the offensive coordinator of your football program is far too important to base on the whims of a singular 18 year old kid.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:47 am to S
I mean my heart says Sloan but my head says they should make a more vetted hire.
I have names but my guess is none of them would be considered, naturally.
I think they are in a bit of predicament with potentially having Nuss for 2 years vs a legit dual threat potentially coming up the pipe afterwards. I think you have to account for that when making a hire.
It’s a little wild but would love to see Kliff Kingsbury’s version of offense with Nuss at the helm. I think that would be a good fit for 2 years. And you let him build his way back into being a HC potentially.
I have names but my guess is none of them would be considered, naturally.
I think they are in a bit of predicament with potentially having Nuss for 2 years vs a legit dual threat potentially coming up the pipe afterwards. I think you have to account for that when making a hire.
It’s a little wild but would love to see Kliff Kingsbury’s version of offense with Nuss at the helm. I think that would be a good fit for 2 years. And you let him build his way back into being a HC potentially.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:49 am to Ellis_Hugh
quote:
Uhhh yes. Wtf?
You are using the discussions on this board as a measurement of the urgency that Kelly is supposedly undertaking.
You specifically wondered if Kelly was waiting and referenced the lack of OC discussion as a sign.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:49 am to Legendary Number 9
quote:
Here's the top 20 offenses in college football this season. Whose OC would we want to poach that is realistic?
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:53 am to Bjorn Cyborg
No, I wasn’t. I was just commenting on how we moved away from it so quickly.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News