- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: J6 prisoner speaks out. ‘I have been held 1000 days without trial.’
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Shocked you didn't include a few sasquatches and the Rougarou
Wait, are you saying FEDs weren’t there?
Damn, you’ve gone off the deep end.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A sample. I don't know their names, obviously, but I just presented enough evidence for my case.
No you did not.
You made an assertion you can not back up.
You pasted a picture.
We now know some of those people were paid agitators.
Again, name those who deserve to be jailed because of their violent acts and site specific "crimes" with evidence.
Go ahead.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:58 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Wait, are you saying FEDs weren’t there?
Damn, you’ve gone off the deep end
No, he's fuiking autistic and likes to run his mouth.
He made an assertion that certain people DESERVED to be imprisoned indefinitely.
I challenged him to back up his assertion.
He cannot and will not try.
He will now do what he always does, shite on the chessboard then strut around like he won the game.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:58 am to theunknownknight
quote:That is EXACTLY who it was
Looks like a bunch of FEDS working with antifa to me
DNC/FBI hired crisis actors and thugs
Posted on 10/20/23 at 7:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Depends on the person and what they did/are charged with.
quote:link to this evidence, please.
There were some really nasty people who did violent things for no reason on J6 who deserve to be jailed.
quote:"created" chaos.
There was a much smaller group of people who came in after those above created chaos who were given false confidence about the propriety of their behaviors. They should not be prosecuted.
testimony under oath has said that they lost count of how many FBI provocateurs/informants there were on J6.
how in the world can it be proven who was and wasn't enticed and provoked?
now that it has come out that the Q Shamon was an FBI informant- (BTW this is a duh many refused to see) it sheds a light on the entire J6 day being one big set-up, no?
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who on here has said those rioters shouldn't have been prosecuted?
So you agree that there is a 2 tier justice system which is based on party allegiance?
quote:
Some did FAFO with federal property and got the hammer, though
Link?
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:00 am to theunknownknight
When you are a pretend Internet Lawyer and you make the assertion
"There were some really nasty people who did violent things for no reason on J6 who deserve to be jailed."
....you can't just paste a piece of propaganda of a bunch of Larpers and Feds then walk away.
"There were some really nasty people who did violent things for no reason on J6 who deserve to be jailed."
....you can't just paste a piece of propaganda of a bunch of Larpers and Feds then walk away.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:01 am to oogabooga68
quote:
No, he's fuiking autistic
He repeats prog talking points ad nauseum. His social dilemma clouds his judgement
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 8:02 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:01 am to Jake88
quote:
Are we to believe all of this? None of this is exaggerated?
Shitty, biased "reporting"
One google search gave me the docket for his appeal
On September 25, the government filed for another extension of time to respond. In the motion, the ASUA states, "Counsel for petitioner does not oppose this further extension."
Here is a Newsweek article about his appeal strategy
quote:
In the petition to the Supreme Court, Lang's team argues that the defendant did not satisfy the "corrupt" element and that various interpretations in lower courts have led to a "cacophonous result that leaves unsettled significant issues."
"The petitioner submits that the Justice Department's overbroad application of the federal penal code to prosecute participants in the January 6, 2021 riot at the Capitol is the act of a behemoth unrecognized, unwarranted and unwelcome in American life," the petition reads.
It went on: "Our political life for centuries has been fractious, with violence all too frequent. Seeking to punish and silence dissent in the name of democracy is the twisted dream of a slumbering tyrant."
The petition urged the justices to hear the case "as the nation's attention turns to the 2024 election." It argued that there is "good reason" to suspect the Justice Department's use of the statute will "serve to chill political speech and expression on the eve of one of the most consequential events in American life – the election of the next President of the United States."
Pattis told Newsweek his client expects to hear in the fall if the Supreme Court will hear the case.
Here is the text from an appellate decision from January 2022 denying his release
quote:
The evidence proffered by the government shows that, over the course of two and a half hours on January 6, 2021, appellant repeatedly pushed, punched, and kicked at police officers defending the Lower West Terrace entrance to the Capitol building. He also slammed a door against one officer's head and struck other officers first with a stolen riot shield and later with a metal baseball bat.
quote:
As we explained in Munchel, "those who actually assaulted police officers . . . are in a different category of dangerousness than those who cheered on the violence or entered the Capitol after others cleared the way." Munchel, 991 F.3d at 1284.
quote:
After January 6, appellant boasted about his conduct, advocated taking up arms against the government, and attempted to organize militias for future acts of violence.
Bad hombre
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:01 am to cajunangelle
quote:
link to this evidence, please.
He pasted a piece of propaganda.
That's his evidence.
Any further "evidence" he posts will simply be some cut and paste the State has fed the sheep.....just watch....
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:02 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:Always crisis actors with you. Doesn't look good for your side? "CRISIS ACTORS, FEDS!" You need therapy.
DNC/FBI hired crisis actors and thugs
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:02 am to GBPackTigers
quote:
Did you ever get to see all the videos of J6 that they said they would release? Me either.
No but that's irrelevant to this discussion.
quote:
They hope people like you keep throwing out the same pictures to make it look catastrophic
No I'm just giving evidence of the type of person who deserved to be prosecuted.
I've never argued these people were involved in some sort of insurrection or were trying to overthrow the government.
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 8:03 am
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A sample. I don't know their names, obviously, but I just presented enough evidence for my case.
You can just categorize them as the people of Walmart.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:03 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Wait, are you saying FEDs weren’t there?
No. Never said that.
There aren't enough federal officers in the field in the DC region to compromise the population I posted.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:03 am to GBPackTigers
quote:
So you agree that there is a 2 tier justice system which is based on party allegiance?
I don't know how anyone can look at the Dems prosecution of Trump starting prior to inauguration and believe its fair on any scale.
I'm no Trump fan but I try to be objective, he was fricked from the start by activism.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The evidence proffered by the government shows that,
Good job, bootlicker.
I mean, if the State says he did it....
I told you to post evidence, not what the State claims to be evidence.
Your assertion was such that you would have people believe you've done some sort of independent research.
BTW, coerced after the fact, strongarmed "admissions" aren't evidence, bootlicker.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:04 am to oogabooga68
quote:
You made an assertion you can not back up.
No I did back it up. With photographic evidence.
quote:
You pasted a picture.
Yes.
quote:
We now know some of those people were paid agitators.
Even if true (and I doubt the veracity of your sources), that doesn't excuse the 99.9% of the others.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:04 am to oogabooga68
quote:
He will now do what he always does, shite on the chessboard then strut around like he won the game
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There aren't enough federal officers in the field in the DC region to compromise the population I posted.
Folks, now SFP has a spy on the inside and is assuring us he is completely familiar with the inner-workings of the Federal Govt.
I mean, there's no way agitators could have been brought in from other places or the Govt would lie about the number of agents in any particular given area.
Posted on 10/20/23 at 8:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The evidence proffered by the government shows that, over the course of two and a half hours on January 6, 2021, appellant repeatedly pushed, punched, and kicked at police officers defending the Lower West Terrace entrance to the Capitol building. He also slammed a door against one officer's head and struck other officers first with a stolen riot shield and later with a metal baseball bat
quote:Thanks. He's working on his future career right now and casting himself as a martyr. He'll be a wealthy influencer when he gets out.
"Counsel for petitioner does not oppose this further extension."
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News