Started By
Message

What keeps homebuilding from being profitable and more prolific?

Posted on 10/17/23 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6133 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 3:32 pm
I know next to nothing of the business, so I'm curious why there just aren't hundreds of thousands of homes being built all over the country to meet this demand. Experts say we have a shortage of millions, everyone claims they want to buy a house, prices for houses seem pretty high, so what's stopping more builders from making more of them and selling them at whatever markup they need to?

Is it a lack of labor making project timelines too unreliable? Cost of borrowing money too high to take on debt for long term projects? Cost of goods fluctuating too much so prices are impossible to predict?

Or is it my alternative theory, that there are actually plenty of houses but just not enough room where a lot of people want to live (major cities) so prices are simply higher than people think they should pay and developers can't move houses as efficiently once you get farther outside of town?

In almost every other facet of an economy a supplier comes in to meet a demand, but we've been "behind" on homes for nearly two decades.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40326 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:13 pm to
I’ve posted this a few times now but I definitely believe that the housing supply in a ton of desirable or formerly desirable areas in many major metros has been decimated by STRs.

What do you think happens to pricing when the housing stock of a neighborhood suddenly becomes wayyyy more valuable than ever before due to the “invention” of modern day STRs.

Sure people could have bought places specifically as an investment before, but the profitability calculation (and valuation) changed MASSIVELY when STRs in their current form came about.

In many desirable areas Houses/apartments/condos are being priced as lucrative commercial businesses that can generate 2x+ what a long term lease would bring in and not as long term residential housing.
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6133 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:24 pm to
I agree with you. Just for fun I just checked in Dallas and zoomed in on one small neighborhood and 122 listings popped up. I'm talking in an area of less than 3 square miles. There are 5,500 in Dallas apparently but not sure how much of the metroplex that's counting. City of Dallas says about 2,000 registered, so 5,500 total and not bothering to register makes sense.

I know a couple cities tried to compromise but enforcement is impossible so I assume most cities are going to move to outright bans next.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34139 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Experts say we have a shortage of millions,


This is bullshite.

In reality, there are plenty of houses. A literal oversupply. But they may not be located in exactly where people want them, with the amenities, in the right condition, in the right school district, with the right crime rate and demographics.

So it's not just a matter of going out and buying a chunk of land and breaking ground. The houses have to be located in the correct spot, and there is generally a shortage of land in those highly sought after places. And what land is available, is very expensive.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2274 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 6:15 pm to
I’ve also said that the shortage is of desirable places to live, not of houses.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35373 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

with the amenities, in the right condition, in the right school district, with the right crime rate and demographics.
This isn’t accurate. It’s not that they’re not in the precise location, they’re often not even in the same region.

In fact, this while your talking points are a bit different, it’s essentially based on the same information and drawing the same conclusions as progressives.

I can find a ton of housing in the rust belt, much of it is unlivable, and even if it is livable, there just aren’t the jobs to available to live in it.

To answer the OP’s question. Developers are the ones who are for making building easier, so it’s not that building is unprofitable (although sometimes harmful and/or unnecessary regulations do make it far less profitable even when things can be built), it’s often that it’s extremely difficult to build in the first place (and those regulations then make it less profitable).
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35373 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

I’ve also said that the shortage is of desirable places to live, not of houses.
This is true, but desirable is often where the jobs are, which means housing may be an entire areas or regions while the jobs are elsewhere.

In other words, it’s as Bjorn describes it like its merely in a different, undesirable neighborhood or something. In fact, the whole progressive focus on gentrification is a result of people moving into “undesirable” neighborhoods, making them desirable. But just as progressives fail to understand, Bjorn fails to understand this is a supply problem in those areas (like entire metros or regions).
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6133 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Developers are the ones who are for making building easier, so it’s not that building is unprofitable (although sometimes harmful and/or unnecessary regulations do make it far less profitable even when things can be built), it’s often that it’s extremely difficult to build in the first place

Is this just because there is simply no room in the desirable locations? Like looking at Dallas, you pretty much have to go 40+ minutes north, south, or east to even find clear space. And I think a lot of that is already committed. Assuming that's the case in a lot of big cities, is expensive housing in cities just the norm going forward?
Posted by Lightning
Texas
Member since May 2014
3118 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 8:24 pm to
- Cost of land in metro areas has increased significantly over the past few years.

- You don’t just need the land and the materials to build a home, you also have to supply roads and utilities. As you go further outside the city, you’ve got to build the road to get there. You also have to run water and sewer lines from the nearest treatment plants to your new neighborhood, unless the whole place is going to be on well water and septic. Millions invested before you start the first home site.
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
11712 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 8:30 pm to
You got any of that land to build all these houses?
Posted by Billy Blanks
Member since Dec 2021
4989 posts
Posted on 10/17/23 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Is it a lack of labor making project timelines too unreliable? Cost of borrowing money too high to take on debt for long term projects? Cost of goods fluctuating too much so prices are impossible to predict?



Most of this.

Also, lots of red tape/coordinating with cities, utilities.


Quality land where people want to be.


Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34139 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 11:14 am to
quote:

This isn’t accurate. It’s not that they’re not in the precise location, they’re often not even in the same region.


But the talking points are that there is a housing shortage, and there isn't.

There are shortages in certain markets, due a lot to geography, crime and other factors.

Rather than trying to cram more houses in already constrained areas by changing zoning and construction regulations, they need to just let the market handle it.

Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11767 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 11:19 am to
Land in actual areas people desire to live.

Plenty of land in undesirable places.

Rezoning. Areas still need Ag, commercial and industrial properties. So cannot rezone everything to residential.
Posted by Decisions
Member since Mar 2015
1604 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:05 pm to
Zoning and regulations.

It’s really that simple.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25194 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

prices for houses seem pretty high, so what's stopping more builders from making more of them and selling them at whatever markup they need to?
You still need buyers that can afford it and qualify for the mortgage. Interest rate hikes the past 12-18 months have screwed the market up. Lots of would-be buyers have been priced out by the rate hikes and current homeowners are reluctant to give up their sub-3% mortgages to buy a new house with a 7.5% rate.

I live in a new-ish development thats still not fully built out. When I moved here 4 years ago, new construction houses were almost always under contract before they were finished. Now most of the new builds end up sitting on the market for months after completion before they get a buyer, so the builders don't have as many new builds going on at the same time now as they did a year or 2 ago.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21697 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:31 pm to
If you really wanted to expand homeownership to families, you'd see either a ban or restriction on large corporations purchasing entire subdivisions.

Raise rates on property taxes owned by corporations vs families and you'll see the black rocks of the world selling property.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94811 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:53 pm to
Short answer: Gubmint

Long answer: Gubbaminnntt
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94811 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

But the talking points are that there is a housing shortage, and there isn't.



But, there really is. The inventory that is available does not align to the budgets of home buyers. There is sufficient housing for the upper middle class, but starter homes seem to be a thing of the past.
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6133 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 3:34 pm to
I despise government, but I also think that governments could find a way to incentivize construction of lower end homes. I've read the trend is to go bigger and higher end as the builder can get more bang for their buck, so it's harder and harder to find simple/more affordable homes.
Posted by LSUShock
Kansas
Member since Jun 2014
5577 posts
Posted on 10/18/23 at 11:20 pm to
Most people in this country can't afford to miss one paycheck, let alone save up enough cash to afford a house.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram