- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2020 election fraud question
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:09 pm to TheQuestion
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:09 pm to TheQuestion
quote:
Why do you believe biden got 81 million votes? Can you produce the evidence or do you just blithely believe the government?
No one has to prove he got 81 million votes. Why can't anyone prove he didn't?
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:13 pm to TheQuestion
quote:
Can ANYONE prove that Biden got 81 mil votes.
No, can anyone PROVE he didn’t? Not 2000 mules bullshite, not Sydney Powell whackjob kraken nonsense. Real, incontrovertible proof? Apparently even Trump can’t, as his OWN LAWYERS are refuting his “irrefutable proof.”
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:50 pm to BayouBoogaloo
quote:First, 2000 mules is video\gps evidence. If you can't accept that, you won't accept anything. We know that people were dumping votes into boxes in an illegal or at the very least, questionable manner. In some cases, the boxes themselves have been deemed not legal.
no one has brought any real, testable, verifiable evidence (not 2000 mules nonsenses) that suggests otherwise
Second, there has been plenty of evidence brought forth in other independent investigations. In fact, I've already cited that GOP plaintiffs won 14 court cases when the evidence was allowed to be presented in court. GA supreme court just ruled that the VoterGA case can proceed. So what you are saying is factually incorrect. Eyewitnesses admitted that homeless people in Georgia were using an outreach shelter as a voting address which is illegal in Georgia. PA changed their voting procedures in an illegal fashion. The Arizona audit blew the roof off of any election fraud denial. But these responses are met with "NUH UNH" from deniers.
quote:You are trying to read minds and this statement is subjective, unverifiable nonsense that you can't prove.
You are VASTLY UNDERESTIMATING the amount of people who really, really dislike trump
quote:You bought the narrative wholesale. Just say that.
There doesn’t need to be some massive collaborative political conspiracy to explain it
quote:Again, factually incorrect. He had more people show up in person on election day than any previous candidate.
Most people hate Trump. It’s that simple, and I’m sorry it doesn’t align with your world view
How many more false things can you say in one thread? You're on your way to an internet message board record.
Also, like the other shills, you haven't answered the question
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:55 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:That's literally how an election works. The winner is determined by proving how many votes they got compared to the opponents.
No one has to prove he got 81 million votes
quote:You mean other than all of the evidence that has been produced for fraud and illegality?
Why can't anyone prove he didn't?
So another person trying to weasel out of the question
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:58 pm to TheQuestion
I definitely think re-litigating the 2020 election is a sound election strategy for republicans in 2024.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:58 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
No one has to prove he got 81 million votes. Why can't anyone prove he didn't?
Why can't anyone, including you, articulate what that proof should look like?
You ignore unconstitutional changes to state election laws, unexplained swing-state count pauses, unsupervised ballot drop boxes, voting machine errors, voting machines with invalid certifications, destruction of evidence, mathematically improbable voter turnout, censorship of dissent, near complete resistance to transparency, AG Barr lying about an investigation that never happened, and other examples of outright voter fraud that were denied a chance to be presented in court between the 2020 election and Biden's inauguration can't simply be chalked up as coincidental. These issues remain unresolved.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 12:02 am to BamaAtl
quote:
quote:
it happened in REAL TIME for those of us who stayed up watching the results
No, it didn't
As usual, you were lied to and you believed it, gullible fool that you are.
A Reuters fact-check?
GTFOH
Posted on 8/20/23 at 12:09 am to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Why can't anyone prove he didn't?
Why can't you accept that it has already been proven? Have you not heard of all the testimonials? Have you not seen the video's? Have you not heard Xiden say it twice? Have you not noticed the pause in the swing states... all at the same time and all with spikes in Xiden votes? You haven't heard of these states breaking state laws?
Of course you have. And since you have you know your side cheated.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 12:09 am to CDawson
quote:
quote:
MAGAs false hope that he’s an actually electable winner
This is hilarious. Morons say that the candidate that received the most in person votes (and most overall) in the history of world elections is unelectable. The guy that received more votes than black Jesus is unelectable.
He’s so unelectable the filth is on a never ending mission to investigate and convict him to try and keep him from running.
That's what we get from the mentally manipulated & their emotional, knee-jerk reactions.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 12:38 am to 2020_reVISION
quote:
A Reuters fact-check? LOL.
You're right. No way Reuters, a top 5 news organization, could stack up against the Gateway Pundit- level rags that routinely get sourced on here by you and comparably- airheaded idiots.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 12:55 am to Dday63
quote:
Georgia did not have a pause in vote counting. Fulton County famously stopped counting votes around 10:30 pm, but resumed counting shortly after 11. And no poll watchers were banned
100% bullshite. Poll watchers were sent home for the evening due to flooding. There was no flood. Then Stacy Abrams’ literal employees finished up stealing GA without observers.
Don’t y’all get it? This is why we are not going to let it go. We saw this happen. You are being lied to.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 1:12 am to Damone
quote:Yeah, you're right. Whenever new DNA evidence is available, we shouldn't open those old cases. Just let it sit. Who cares that a person is jailed wrongfully or that a guilty person is walking around free.
I definitely think re-litigating the 2020 election is a sound election strategy for republicans in 2024.
genius
Posted on 8/20/23 at 1:13 am to texridder
quote:I've already addressed that article.
No way Reuters, a top 5 news organization
But why don't you answer the question?
Posted on 8/20/23 at 1:51 am to TheQuestion
quote:
Who cares that a person is jailed wrongfully
That one in particular isn’t going to work on them. I don’t think I’m going too far out on a limb here to say they don’t really care about wrongfully jailing people. They’ve taken much pleasure in it with Trump.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 2:32 am to BayouBoogaloo
quote:
No, because no one has brought any real, testable, verifiable evidence (not 2000 mules nonsenses) that suggests otherwise.
Nobody, including you, can define what "any real, testable, verifiable evidence (not 2000 mules nonsenses) that suggests otherwise would be.
You'll be the first,should you care to try, to do so. I don't believe you will, as I don't believe you can. Prove me wrong.
You are VASTLY UNDERESTIMATING the amount of people who really, really dislike trump. There doesn’t need to be some massive collaborative political conspiracy to explain it. Most people hate Trump. It’s that simple, and I’m sorry it doesn’t align with your world view.[/quote]
That is a BS argument based on conjecture, emotions, and numbers provided by the very people accused of the crime(s) that have investigated & policed themselves while being subjected to virtually no thorough & independent scrutiny.
You're either unaware of, or choose to ignore blatant election procedure, legal, & constitutional violations, and overwhelming resistance to transparency.
It’s that simple, and I’m sorry it doesn’t align with your world view, which is clearly rife with ignorance & naivety.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 6:50 am to 2020_reVISION
quote:
Accessing/obtaining any and all election related evidence should never be a burden on a U.S. citizen.
Exactly.
People are innocent until proven guilty.
Government is guilty until proven innocent.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 8:11 am to Chili Dawg
quote:
100% bullshite. Poll watchers were sent home for the evening due to flooding. There was no flood. Then Stacy Abrams’ literal employees finished up stealing GA without observers.
At least you identified your own comments as 109% bullshite.
There was no flood, and no one claimed there was a flood. Perhaps you saw some erroneous news reports, but no one was sent home from State Farm Arena due to a water leak or flooding.
There was a water leak in the MORNING on election day, that threatened the room where absentee ballots were stored. This delayed the START of ballot counting, but it had nothing to do with the evening stop in the count.
They stopped counting at night because they thought it was time to go home. Multiple poll watchers from both parties have stated no one told them to leave. One worker shouted out that it was time to stop counting, so the poll watchers left on their own.
When the vote counting restarted, they were free to come back. There was no legal requirement for the workers to wait on the watchers before restarting.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 8:17 am to Dday63
quote:
There was no flood, and no one claimed there was a flood. Perhaps you saw some erroneous news reports, but no one was sent home from State Farm Arena due to a water leak or flooding.
There was a water leak in the MORNING on election day, that threatened the room where absentee ballots were stored. This delayed the START of ballot counting, but it had nothing to do with the evening stop in the count
two days from now the flood story will be back.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 8:30 am to 2020_reVISION
quote:
You're either unaware of, or choose to ignore blatant election procedure, legal, & constitutional violations, and overwhelming resistance to transparency.
im interested in your specific constitution violations.
do spell them out.
and if its not too much trouble please comment upon Trumps three instances of calling upon the nation to reinstall him without regard for constitutional processes. he was specific.
ignore the constitution and make me president now.
now!
people (me for months on td, old conservative harvard law prof lawrence tribe recently) see that request on trumps part as a call to insurrection.
since you are bringing up some election 2020 constitution issue maybe the big picture right now is worthy of your address.
Posted on 8/20/23 at 8:45 am to Dday63
quote:What you are saying is in direct contradiction to election officials.
There was no flood, and no one claimed there was a flood. Perhaps you saw some erroneous news reports, but no one was sent home from State Farm Arena due to a water leak or flooding.
There was a water leak in the MORNING on election day, that threatened the room where absentee ballots were stored. This delayed the START of ballot counting, but it had nothing to do with the evening stop in the count.
They stopped counting at night because they thought it was time to go home. Multiple poll watchers from both parties have stated no one told them to leave
"Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections, told ABC News that the election department sent the State Farm Arena absentee ballot counters home at 10:30 p.m. despite earlier intentions to complete processing Tuesday night. Some additional numbers could still come out Tuesday night, but as of now the staff will be back at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday."
quote:As I stated earlier, counting resumed without the watchers being present. No reasonable person thinks that's not shady. That doesn't even address the actual video of them producing ballots like clowns getting out of the volkswagon at the circus.
When the vote counting restarted, they were free to come back
quote:So you're admitting there was a lack of transparency. Thank you. Now maybe you understand why people were upset at the whole charade. The water leak was engineered to send the poll watchers home so they could pull the ballots out from the suitcases and count fake ballots.
There was no legal requirement for the workers to wait on the watchers before restarting
How has this story been so misunderstood by people? I'm quoting Georgia elecion officials
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News