- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2020 election fraud question
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:14 pm to CelticDog
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:14 pm to CelticDog
quote:We can do that but, it doesn't prove that there wasn't fraud because jurisprudence is not always and only about the truth. Sometimes guilty people go free and innocent people are convicted.
why doesnt someone post a coherent exploration of the claims?
But that's not the point. Do you know of any cases where the evidence was presented in court? I know an AZ court just ruled against the SOS. I know the VoterGA case is about to proceed. We'll see how they go. But to not err on the side of caution by investigating each and every accusation regarding our elections is just unacceptable.
The cases that I read were problematic in that they were somewhat novel. Judges had issues deciding exactly who was harmed and therefore standing was a roadblock in some of the cases.
2
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:25 pm to CelticDog
quote:Signature matching irregularities
suspicious? very suspicious! who said? what happened? some?.. a number
Even Hank admits "Secretary of State was using a much broader basis for comparison and thus approving many signatures that did NOT match the registration card."
Posted on 9/6/23 at 10:35 pm to TheQuestion
quote:The Ninjas used the Melissa commercial database to compile their statistics. You have to be a complete fool to think you can use a commercial database to check election results.
Cyber Ninjas Response
Mellssa says their database covers 80% of the adults in the U. S. There are 3 million voters in Maricopa County. That means there are 600,000 Maricopa voters that are NOT in the Melissa database.
Gee, no wonder the Ninjas vote numbers are pure crap.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 10:38 pm to texridder
Weird you are avoiding the illegals double dipping thread 
Posted on 9/6/23 at 10:44 pm to texridder
quote:
Mellssa says their database covers 80% of the adults in the U. S. There are 3 million voters in Maricopa County. That means there are 600,000 Maricopa voters that are NOT in the Melissa database.
Not familiar with the database or report but are you claiming it's an 80% constant across all locales? Could it be 100% in one county and 60% of another equally populated county?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 11:00 pm to TheQuestion
This is a very popular subject on this board.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 12:15 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
Not familiar with the database or report but are you claiming it's an 80% constant across all locales? Could it be 100% in one county and 60% of another equally populated county?
80% is a general average.
You're right. It could be more or less in one county. Arizona has 15 counties so the variance would likely be less for the entire state than looking at single county.
But, just for sale of argument, let's assume that there are 10% of Arizona adults that are not in the Melissa data. That's 300,000 people in Maricopa missing from the database the Ninjas were using.
That's NOT close enough for governmemt work.
This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 12:34 am
Posted on 9/7/23 at 12:21 am to texridder
quote:
But, just for sale of argument, let's assume that there are 10% of Atizona adults that are not in the Melissa data. That's 300,000 people in Arizona missing from the database the Ninjas were using.
That's NOT close enough for governmemt work.
Understood. But if you're gonna question its use for a given county, you would need to know what its pct was for that county. Everywhere else is irrelevant.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 12:28 am to TheQuestion
quote:
But to not err on the side of caution by investigating each and every accusation regarding our elections is just unacceptable.
This is the second time you have posted this idiocy. "Each and every" accusation. Trump made a bogus election claim virtually every day.
Investigating every one of them would be "Wack-A-Mole" squared.
You're not a serious poster.
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:11 am to TheQuestion
quote:
why doesnt someone post a coherent exploration of the claims?
We can do that
Past experience has shown that you cannot do that, because your claims are bullshite.
Page 16 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News