- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
‘Free Speech Right Not Absolute’ – Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan Delivers Mixed Ruling
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:55 pm
quote:
“There are limits, regardless of what is going on in, I hate to say it, his day job. This is a criminal case. The need for this criminal case to proceed in the normal order and protect witnesses and integrity of the process means there are going to be limits on the defendant’s speech.” – the Judge said arguing the First Amendment is “not absolute.”
Lmao!!! They will have to put him in jail.
LINK
16
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:56 pm to Jjdoc
How does any ruling by her on this NOT get fast tracked to SCOTUS after that statement?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:57 pm to Jjdoc
He should just tweet . . . "frick THAT BITCH!"
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:58 pm to Jjdoc
All are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:58 pm to jawnybnsc
quote:
He should just tweet . . . "frick THAT BITCH!"
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:58 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
This is a criminal case
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:59 pm to Jjdoc
They're going to try to criminalize everything he says from now to November '24. Draw a line NOW!
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:01 pm to jawnybnsc
Only reason this is even happening, is because they are petrified of him returning to the White House. I am starting to believe that the deepstate won’t allow the election to take place before that happens
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:02 pm to Jjdoc
Kangaroo court
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:02 pm to jawnybnsc
quote:
He should just tweet . . . "frick THAT BITCH!"
I'd be a fan of that -
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:04 pm to Jjdoc
I really think they’re at their last straw before just trying to kill him.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:05 pm to Jjdoc
This is outrageous! I would argue everything they are falsely accusing Trump of is exactly what they are doing to undermine an election. Typical Democrat playbook. They always are the exact people they accuse Republicans of being. They always do the bad things they accuse Republicans of doing. Scum.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:05 pm to teke184
quote:
How does any ruling by her on this NOT get fast tracked to SCOTUS after that statement?
Fast tracked for what? For a mean judge? SCOTUS has to have a case to rule on. I don't think they do change of venue. Whoever the SCOTUS boss is for the DC circuit might chime in. I think it's Roberts.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:06 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
For any gag order since this is clearly a First Amendment issue and also interfering with a presidential campaign, which was supposedly one of the reasons why it was so evil to bring up Biden being a corrupt fricker in Ukraine, which got Trump impeached.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:08 pm to EST
quote:
This is outrageous! I would argue everything they are falsely accusing Trump of is exactly what they are doing to undermine an election. Typical Democrat playbook. They always are the exact people they accuse Republicans of being. They always do the bad things they accuse Republicans of doing. Scum.
Thats a fact
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:08 pm to Jjdoc
Fck this ignorant and racist bitch.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:09 pm to Jjdoc
This should tell anybody who’s curious who Jack Smith and this DOJ really are…
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:16 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
“There are limits, regardless of what is going on in, I hate to say it, his day job. This is a criminal case. The need for this criminal case to proceed in the normal order and protect witnesses and integrity of the process means there are going to be limits on the defendant’s speech.” – the Judge said arguing the First Amendment is “not absolute.”
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
That amendment is absolute and there is no due process here, sufficient to strip him of any of his rights.
People need to get it in their heads - these amendments are absolute. They mean absolutely what they say, nothing more, nothing less. Judges and senile, sex predator, pants shitting old men do not have the authority to carve out exceptions at their whim. That is the definition of tyranny.
There's no way she would speak this way about the press, and she certainly isn't concerned about the leaks that come from DOJ, so she's just letting her bias show. She's a Dem operative, not a judge. I hope Trump puts her on blast and says whatever he feels like saying.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:18 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
That amendment is absolute
Sigh.
I guess libel, defamation, and certain security laws don’t exist. They must all be unconstitutional.
This post was edited on 8/11/23 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:19 pm to Deuces
quote:
I really think they’re at their last straw before just trying to kill him.
Nothing is off limits to them, I'm sure, but this would create the biggest mess in this nation since the Civil War, I believe. It would an Arch Duke Ferdinand type of moment.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News