Started By
Message

re: So we can identify all Jan 6 people but not coke heads?

Posted on 7/15/23 at 9:21 am to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 9:21 am to
quote:

So we can identify all Jan 6 people but not coke heads?
the same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all!
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
12024 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag.


So its the equipment?
We can spot the birth of a planet millions of miles into space but we can't identify drugs six ft away. Those bags were whisked into that cubby hole by a force unknown to man. No finger prints no DNA.
Those government police, Capital Building and White House are having a bad year.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
5764 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 9:39 am to
Oh shut the frick you liberal cuck. You know good and damn well if this happened when Trump was in office it would be a national scandal that went on for years with all the douchebag liberal media calling for Trump to be thrown in prison with zero evidence. Since it’s sleepy Joe and his crackhead son though they close the investigation in a week and say “nothing to see here”. It makes me sick how you people are destroying this country by electing people like Biden and Obama. The west wing has cameras EVERYWHERE. You also can’t tell me that those lockers don’t have some sort of system where someone knows who has which locker. You also can’t tell me they can’t take fingerprints, do DNA and look back at security video to know exactly who it was. They already know and the fact that they are covering it up obviously means it’s someone important enough that they don’t want it getting out because it would destroy “the big guy”.
This post was edited on 7/15/23 at 9:43 am
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12996 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 9:58 am to
quote:

the same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all!


And there’s StatistHank defending the rank hypocrisy of law enforcement
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18965 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:11 am to
quote:

the same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all

The story has changed a few times, but last I heard the baggie was found in a place where items (cell phones) are left

They can just go to the cameras to see the last person that left shite there

It is damn near impossible to believe they don’t know who left it there
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37697 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:16 am to
quote:

the same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all!




I guarantee you that if there was anthrax or some more nefarious substance in that baggie they would go to the ends of the earth to find out who brought it in. They either: 1); Don't care enough or 2) they know and are letting it slide.

We are talking about the most monitored and secured places on the the planet.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10407 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:25 am to
And you call yourself a lawyer? Those cameras have the highest resolution, are placed where nothing is missed, records everything. They finally admitted to bags whereabouts after previous attempts to saying other spots which now seems to be located near situation room. All people are logged and searched in numerous ways and it’s of the highest level of security except for a very small amount of people ( family members). The bag of course would have fingerprints as no coke head would be wiping down his bag between uses. Supposedly there has been multiple bags found before. Where is that information? Opens up a whole new perspective if it was fentanyl or anthrax wouldn’t it?
This post was edited on 7/15/23 at 10:40 am
Posted by rhar61
Member since Nov 2022
5109 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:51 am to
quote:

the same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all!



figures this son of a bitch would make excuses
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
3513 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:54 am to
It’s not like this happened in the most secure building on the planet or anything…. but you knew that.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 10:57 am to
quote:

The same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all!

Normally I would say imagine being this stupid.

But this is the same “lawyer” that thinks rittenhouse murdered someone, the mccloskeys destroyed their own gate, 9/11 was the result of us isolationism, white people are obsessed with wakanda, etc.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45848 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 11:00 am to
quote:

the same cameras that can easily spot a nine square-foot placard sign have more difficulty spotting a one square inch clear plastic bag. The injustice of it all!
The security cameras used in the WhiteHouse are 20 megapixel 5472x3648 resolution. I think they could easily spot a 1 square inch baggie.
Posted by Thedillyplate
Galion by the St. John
Member since Dec 2016
156 posts
Posted on 7/15/23 at 12:32 pm to
It's not the bag but rather who is carrying the bag
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram