- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:41 pm to Corso
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:41 pm to Corso
quote:
Why not just say yes this is going on, everybody knows it is, and we've got to stop it.
Because dishonest arguments are used to inflate the impact of this activity, especially domestically. To tie it into the OP, is anyone disputing that the Q stuff did not rely heavily on allegations of powerful people trafficking minors for sex?
quote:
Why dismiss it as Q-Anon paranoia
Why did Q-Anon paranoia dishonestly amplify this issue and lie about it? That goes both ways.
5
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why did Q-Anon paranoia dishonestly amplify this issue and lie about it? That goes both ways.
Was Q-Anon mentioned in the movie? If it wasn't then it's irrelevant and this author is just slapping labels on it like the media always does
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because dishonest arguments are used to inflate the impact of this activity, especially domestically. To tie it into the OP, is anyone disputing that the Q stuff did not rely heavily on allegations of powerful people trafficking minors for sex?
Because a rich dude died in prison having been arrested for sex trafficking and now his confidant is in jail.
And the entire anti trump crowd uses Epstein's ties to Trump as Tump bad.
So… it’s not just a Q thing.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
So you’re here to play hall monitor and deflect for pedophiles? Can’t say that I’m surprised, all of you groomers are the same
Posted on 7/9/23 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:So what is the frequency of powerful people trafficking minors for sex? Not a rhetorical question. Just curious if there are solid numbers. Because the individual stories are horrifying. E.g., Epstein and cartels being birds of a feather.
Because dishonest arguments are used to inflate the impact of this activity, especially domestically. To tie it into the OP, is anyone disputing that the Q stuff did not rely heavily on allegations of powerful people trafficking minors for sex?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 6:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
So you’re saying you still believe powerful people aren’t trafficking people?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News