- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Over 90% of US climate data is corrupted
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:58 pm to biglego
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:58 pm to biglego
quote:
Academia is wholly owned by leftists. Science is not impartial.
If you tell scientists that you will pay them if they find evidence of ghost, do you think they will find any?
You're damn right they will!
0
Posted on 6/12/23 at 10:58 pm to indianswim
Sorry, that's not a new study, this has been known for at least 15 years. The new publishing may be an analysis of existing studies, but improper placement of temperature monitoring stations has been well known by actual scientists.
Nobody cares. They need Greta to cause the EU to ban internal combustion engines. Profit.
Nobody cares. They need Greta to cause the EU to ban internal combustion engines. Profit.
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:18 pm to indianswim
quote:
When discussing the “modest warming” that the planet has exhibited, there is a need to have solid data
Yeah I’m not even gonna cede this ground either…the whole GW/Climate Change BS is just that…BS.
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:20 pm to indianswim
quote:
I'll start worrying when they all start selling their oceanfront property and setting up shop in the heartland.
This. 100% this.
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:29 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
25-30K-yrs ago, Manhattan Island was beneath more than 1.5 miles (2.4 km) of glacial ice.
25-30?
I thought that the range was 20-25 with the peak at about 23.
5,000 years before the ice age was obviously warmer than during the peak (technically we are still in an “ice age” now though interglacial).
Nonetheless, I get you point.
Ice age peak = much colder.
Posted on 6/12/23 at 11:29 pm to tarzana
quote:
Corrupted... who cares?
This right here, ladies and gentlemen. Here’s a leftist that says hey, it’s hot outside so who cares about things like…accurate temperature readings.
In other words, we need legislation and regulations to solve global warming, but we need not bother measuring that warming.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 12:11 am to tarzana
quote:
That did not happen in the 1970s, the 1980s or the 1990s
Yeah...double check 1980.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 5:54 am to indianswim
Anthony Watts is the man. His website has always been a source that challenges and debunks the climate hysteria. LINK
Posted on 6/13/23 at 6:06 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
What does this have to do with academia?
Quit while you’re ahead dude!!
Clearly you are clueless, the fact that you asked that specific question shows how utterly clueless you are!
Academia is where ALL this nonsense started!! They are as honest as the Biden family, they are all a bunch of lefty morons, they live in a vacuum where actions do not have consequences!!
Posted on 6/13/23 at 6:09 am to DMC226
These questions are not directed at anyone who would like to answer:
Now here is a little experiment to try at home:
Get two regular thermometers and set them side by side, perhaps on your porch, in the back yard, under a tree...
Now record the temperatures of BOTH thermometers every few hours.
See if you consistent readings from the two thermometers.
quote:
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
8. Identify the correct year in history as the benchmark.
Now here is a little experiment to try at home:
Get two regular thermometers and set them side by side, perhaps on your porch, in the back yard, under a tree...
Now record the temperatures of BOTH thermometers every few hours.
See if you consistent readings from the two thermometers.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 6:13 am to indianswim
Perusing this thread.. apparently there’s people who legitimately don’t trust thermometers?
I mean I understand the heat island effect but this seems to go beyond that, and is some groundbreaking thing that actual scientists and weathermen would never consider. Instead of posting here, maybe you should write your local weather guy and ask about it. Just a thought.
I mean I understand the heat island effect but this seems to go beyond that, and is some groundbreaking thing that actual scientists and weathermen would never consider. Instead of posting here, maybe you should write your local weather guy and ask about it. Just a thought.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 6:16 am
Posted on 6/13/23 at 6:29 pm to jimmy the leg
This was in College Station in June, 1980?
That was a very unusual year, and that level of hotness didn't happen again until 1998, and again in 2009.
Now it's the New Normal. The heat...is OPPRESSIVE, and just getting worse
That was a very unusual year, and that level of hotness didn't happen again until 1998, and again in 2009.
Now it's the New Normal. The heat...is OPPRESSIVE, and just getting worse
Posted on 6/13/23 at 7:28 pm to tarzana
quote:
Now it's the New Normal.
No...It's not.
That's kind of the point of data.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:27 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:Dr. Watts, from UAH, has been a real climate scientist his whole career.
What I do know is the Heartland Institute has a shady past of essentially lying to the public presenting false claims because they were being paid to do so. I get that you desperately want to believe it’s a hoax for some reason and will cling to anything that backs you up, but trusting info coming from a proven paid lying source doesn’t seem like the way to go.
Why should he receive blame for associating with whatever institution he wishes regardless of where Heartland has ever been.
The majority of narrative of the HOAX side of this issue receives support to say the things say. From a multitude of sources who are developing nefarious narrative designed by and for globalists, Heartland almost certainly is better than that; BUT to act like Dr. Watts is to be questioned while others are not? The emperor not only has no clothes, they are not even the emperor,
I stand with Dr. Watts and his record of integrity. If you have concrete evidence of him being compromised lets hear it.
Especially if you stand with those WE KNOW ARE CORRUPTED to foster and spread this HOAX narrative..
At least Watts is saying what his own studies have said.. Not so with the narrative paid words.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:28 pm to tarzana
quote:You can not prove a word of that anecdote.
Now it's the New Normal. The heat...is OPPRESSIVE, and just getting worse
Did you know we had the coolest April in over 40 year? Didnt hear about that though, did we?
The effect of the entirety of anthropogenic weather impact is miniscule and LESS than consequential.
So we take gas stoves and correct it?
We are even LESS than able to alter the planets climate.
Grow up. Become honest, if you are able.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 8:42 pm to tarzana
quote:Let's see your study - or this remains a silly anecdote from someone who enjoys globalist narratives..
Corrupted... who cares?
All I know is that it's hot as h*ll in Southeast Texas with an immovable heat dome over the entire state, and it's gotten to where these oppressive heat waves park themselves here each summer, for weeks, even months at a time.
That did not happen in the 1970s, the 1980s or the 1990s. Empirical evidence, not "corrupted data", tell me the climate is changing, and not for the better.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 3:44 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
Did you know we had the coolest April in over 40 year? Didnt hear about that though, did we?
And that's why they don't call it Global Warming anymore. Things don't start to fit the narrative and they call it Global Climate Change, so any event they can say matches what they say, regardless of if it's been happening for centuries.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 4:51 pm to indianswim
quote:
Over 90% of US climate data is corrupted
100% is greater than 90% so that statement is true.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 9:57 pm to Deplorableinohio
Still nothing you pos.
Posted on 6/14/23 at 10:04 pm to tarzana
You realize it was throw up hot prior to 1980 - right?
Also,
is simply untrue. You have just bought into the lies. I don’t blame you, since Queen Greta and her minions bombard the world daily with their messaging. However, the headlines and the predictions that they are based on are either flat out wrong, or highly suspect:
And then there are the headlines: Fear porn…
Also,
quote:
Now it's the New Normal.
is simply untrue. You have just bought into the lies. I don’t blame you, since Queen Greta and her minions bombard the world daily with their messaging. However, the headlines and the predictions that they are based on are either flat out wrong, or highly suspect:
quote:
Glacier National Park is removing signs that state all glaciers will be melted by 2020. Park spokeswoman Gina Kurzmen explained that since the early 2000s scientists have reflected and analyzed data stating glaciers would recede by 2020. She told MTN News that the latest research shows shrinking, but in ways much more complex than what was predicted. Because of this, the park must update all signs around the park stating all glaciers will be melted by 2020.
And then there are the headlines: Fear porn…
This post was edited on 6/14/23 at 10:31 pm
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News