Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Berkshire Stock

Posted on 11/19/08 at 3:29 pm
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51357 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 3:29 pm
A few questions.
Whats the difference between class A and class B stock?
Why is is so expensive?
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 3:34 pm to
Class A (if that's the expensive one) has never split. It's so "expensive" (I dislike the use of the term in this example) because it has run up a shitload over the past 40 years of staggering returns that he has produced.

Class B is divided into smaller $ amounts to allow retail investors the opportunity to invest.
Posted by Colonel Hapablap
Mostly Harmless
Member since Nov 2003
28791 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 3:41 pm to
AND NONE OF THEM HAVE PUTS.
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13873 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 3:41 pm to
Also note that the Bill Gates/Buffett foundation owns a ton of class B shares, but not class A. Just something to think about when investing (although not too many people can afford class A shares).
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 4:13 pm to
CDS on Berkshire went through the roof this week. Not that I expect that they hold any water, just another signal of credit cramping up hard again.
Posted by Putty
Member since Oct 2003
25901 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Whats the difference between class A and class B stock?


Class B was also set up with the purpose of allowing stockholders to gift shares to family for tax planning purposes...I think Class B has like 1/32 of a voting right of Class A
This post was edited on 11/19/08 at 4:25 pm
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
76179 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

I think Class B has like 1/32 of a voting right of Class A

this is correct, also Class A shares can be converted at any time to 32 B shares for each A share. However you cannot convert 32 B shares into one A share. The company recommends that if you plan to buy B shares in bulk to just buy A shares instead.

ETA: The also take measures to ensure that the ratio between A and B shares stays as close to 1/32 as possible so people can't take advantage of the spread
This post was edited on 11/19/08 at 5:50 pm
Posted by Nicodemus
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
93 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Class B was also set up with the purpose of allowing stockholders to gift shares to family for tax planning purposes...I think Class B has like 1/32 of a voting right of Class A


This is not entirely correct. An A share can be traded in for 30 B shares, thereby forcing the value of the B share to equal 1/30 the value of the A share at all times due to arbitrage.

The B share has no voting rights.

Warren Buffett introduced the B share in the 90's because he heard that fund managers planned on setting up a fund that held only A shares and allowing investors to invest in the fund, thereby allowing those investors to have fractional ownership in the A shares. Warren Buffett did not like that idea so he beat them to the punch by introducing the B shares.

Buffett has never split his stock because he only wants long-term investors. He feels that splitting the stock adds no value and only makes it more attractive to shorter-term investors.
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
117975 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 8:31 pm to
Nicodemus, Buffet is correct. Dilution of shares does not add to investor value. One of the biggest mistakes an investor can participate in is buying after a split.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 11/19/08 at 8:34 pm to


There is no dilution in a stock split...
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 11/20/08 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Nicodemus, Buffet is correct. Dilution of shares does not add to investor value. One of the biggest mistakes an investor can participate in is buying after a split.


Not necessarily. If a split results in higher liquidity, the total value of all shares goes up. This is harder to do now though because people are no longer restricted to buying in "round lots" of 100 shares like they were back in the day.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 11/20/08 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

AND NONE OF THEM HAVE PUTS.


Probably not much of a market for betting against Da Man.
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
21166 posts
Posted on 11/20/08 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Probably not much of a market for betting against Da Man.


i disagree... when Da Man goes all in with GS, WFC, and GE. (and, yes, I know GE is more of a bond relationship)
Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
12276 posts
Posted on 11/20/08 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Dilution of shares does not add to investor value. One of the biggest mistakes an investor can participate in is buying after a split.


As much as I love the boxer.... how can a split cause dilution?
Posted by Colonel Hapablap
Mostly Harmless
Member since Nov 2003
28791 posts
Posted on 11/20/08 at 9:14 pm to
I would love to bet against him right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram