Started By
Message

re: Most Overrated Player In NBA History

Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204294 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:08 pm to
Just Justin your chops shel. Unlike most on here I can have a objective conversation with you…
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32961 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Another qualifier to add to Russell has 0 titles FACTUALLY!!

I don't give a shite about the Russell argument, I'm just pointing out that adding teams doesn't make it harder to win a championship.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

LA didn't get the benefit of a 1 seed whatsoever. It's probably the most even, fair, set of conditions for a playoffs ever.


The 140 days of rest more than make up for it. They also played zero road games, including zero high altitude games. No hostile road environments. No travel. Compared to every other playoff, it was a cakewalk, except for having to spend time away from their side pieces. Also, Anthony Davis, known as Mr. Glass, was likely the biggest benefactor of said break.

Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

If that's the case, what's the point in having an 82 game regular season? Why not just have 2-4 weeks of seeding games, and then have the playoffs?


Correct.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32961 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:16 pm to
Hell, the NBA is about to implement a mid-season tournament, are we gonna crown the winner of that as a champion, too?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111301 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

If that's the case, what's the point in having an 82 game regular season? Why not just have 2-4 weeks of seeding games, and then have the playoffs?

The NBA isn't in the let's make everything fair for all teams business. They're in the let's make as much money as possible business.


So that is why the season is not 2-4 weeks.

But to your point, it's opposite. We have the season and give the higher seeds an advantage for the playoffs. The Lakers were the 1 seed, and they lost that advantage, so they gained no advantage whatsoever. The delay in the league season happened for all 30 teams, so the only advantage/disadvantage was having all games homecourt and thus adversely affecting teams with homecourt advantage.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59193 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

I don't give a shite about the Russell argument, I'm just pointing out that adding teams doesn't make it harder to win a championship.


Wut? How is it not harder to beat more and better teams?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111301 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

I don't give a shite about the Russell argument, I'm just pointing out that adding teams doesn't make it harder to win a championship.

Without any context, maybe(though I disagree with that too). With the context of the 2 actual scenarios, it was definitely easier to win with 8 teams for Russell to win than it is now with 30 teams.


This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 12:21 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32961 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

so the only advantage/disadvantage was having all games homecourt and thus adversely affecting teams with homecourt advantage.

So there was no advantage to an older team with injury prone players to have extended rest?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111301 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

The 140 days of rest more than make up for it. They also played zero road games, including zero high altitude games. No hostile road environments. No travel.
Damn, that's 1 hell of an advantage the Lakers had that no other team in the league had in 2020.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

But to your point, it's opposite. We have the season and give the higher seeds an advantage for the playoffs. The Lakers were the 1 seed, and they lost that advantage, so they gained no advantage whatsoever. The delay in the league season happened for all 30 teams, so the only advantage/disadvantage was having all games homecourt and thus adversely affecting teams with homecourt advantage.


The argument is 2020 vs every other year. Not lakers vs other bubble teams.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32961 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:23 pm to
Do you not see how that is more of an advantage for certain teams over others?
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83853 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I'm just pointing out that adding teams doesn't make it harder to win a championship.
There are situations where adding teams would definitely make it harder
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111301 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

So there was no advantage to an older team with injury prone players to have extended rest?
Every team played under the same parameterse.


They also weren't really older. Lebron was 35, but to that point, invincible. He was going to be fine regardless.

Pretty sure their next 3 best players were 26 and under.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32961 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:27 pm to
If you look at the post I initially responded to it was regarding Jordan never winning a title when there were 30 teams. Going from 27 to 30 teams isn't going to make it more difficult to win a title.
This post was edited on 5/25/23 at 12:40 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111301 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Do you not see how that is more of an advantage for certain teams over others?

Other than AD, I don't agree with the premise that the Lakers were old and filled with injury prone players. I don't think either is true, so no, I'm not convinced that helped them more than other teams.


Do you not agree that losing homecourt hurt the Lakers more than any other team in the postseason?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32961 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

They also weren't really older.

They were the second oldest team in the nba that season and their star was 35 years old. Their second best player is also very injury prone. Keep acting like extra rest wasn’t very beneficial for that team though
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

if there were still fewer teams wouldn't that make it more difficult?

Just FWIW, I'm not qualifying titles.

My argument re: titles is that they're a team stat.

I'm saying all titles should count, though.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Nothing is even close to that anomaly.

According to you, primarily b/c that helps your argument
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

They also weren't really older. Lebron was 35, but to that point, invincible. He was going to be fine regardless.


Except for the season before he played 55 games and began his physical breakdown.
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram