Started By
Message

Unemployment numbers at a 50 year low but average person does not favor economy

Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:38 am
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19428 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:38 am
What am I missing? Also, many analysts believe there will be a recession.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26432 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:42 am to
quote:

What am I missing?


Very shitty data.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61306 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:44 am to
You seem to be fired up with jobs data and such this morning. All over it on the PT and here.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14476 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:45 am to
People can’t afford their 2 largest expenses anymore.


Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19428 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:49 am to
quote:

You seem to be fired up with jobs data and such this morning. All over it on the PT and here.

It really doesn't make sense. I also like seeing both sides of the spectrum.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
3383 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:54 am to
Some frustration I'm having is with the quality of data we are seeing right now.

They adjusted payroll numbers down for Feb and March. They will probably do it for April again without anyone questioning why they were so broken in the first place. These weren't minor adjustments - these were 30% to 50% revisions, all downward. Hopefully that won't happen again and that people making policy decisions aren't using the bad numbers previously reported.

Housing is down, but everyone expected that. That is arguably a good thing, as it was superheated for several years. Some markets needed this correction.

Commercial real estate is way down, and will continue to fall as business leases start expiring. It will be a huge problem in NYC, Houston, Chicago, and the other big office markets. Unknown if this is just a factor of our more WFH focused culture or if there is real scale backs happening on the job front.

Also - not all jobs are created equal: And if WSJ can be trusted, the only job gains we are seeing are lower level service positions that were left unfilled during the pandemic (restaurants, hospitality, etc.). Sorry but that's not going to compensate for the massive layoffs in big tech, B4 consulting, and in the financial industry - those companies pay $150-$250k per year for a lot of those positions they are eliminating.

I'm on the pessimistic side.
Posted by frequent flyer
USA
Member since Jul 2021
3383 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 8:57 am to
quote:

People can’t afford their 2 largest expenses anymore.



Well maybe it's just transitory economic pain. And not anything you should be concerned with.

Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
77835 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:03 am to
quote:

People can’t afford their 2 largest expenses anymore.


Then you would think that people aren’t spending money on leisurely activities. The reality is, hotels, restaurants and airports are busier than they were pre Covid.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:08 am to
The slowdown is coming, but the debate is whether or not it will be a full blown recession. The Fed is literally trying to slow down the economy.

As far as people’s opinions of the economy, the biggest factor, IMO, is how high the bar has been set. Unemployment was at all time lows in the months leading up to the pandemic, so to just get back and slightly improve those numbers feels like the last 3 years have been wasted.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
12871 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:22 am to
The “numbers” are complete garbage.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:24 am to
quote:

The “numbers” are complete garbage.


Show your work.

Anecdotally, how many people do you know who want a job and can’t find one?
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20812 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:24 am to
Because using unemployment numbers as a basis for an argument about the economy misses too many other factors; underemployment issues, people no longer eligible for UE benefits do not fully count when calculating UE numbers, also doesn't factor those that have left the employment market completely.

Also, when you have inflation growing at the rate we have experienced over the past 2+ years, people are not going to have favorable views of the economy regardless of any of the other factors.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11869 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:37 am to
They made a regulation change for payment processing companies that added gig economy jobs to the payroll numbers. They also model out labor supply increases based on population growth and new business applications that more than likely won't reflect reality.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57978 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Then you would think that people aren’t spending money on leisurely activities. The reality is, hotels, restaurants and airports are busier than they were pre Covid.


Which is why I think we're in a consumer credit bubble. Consumers seem to have been trying to maintain their lifestyles on their credit cards even though the average interest rate now hovers around 20%. That's simply unsustainable in a slowing economy.
Posted by ChexMix
Taste the Deliciousness
Member since Apr 2014
25494 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 10:05 am to
quote:

And if WSJ can be trusted
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57978 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 10:09 am to
quote:

The slowdown is coming, but the debate is whether or not it will be a full blown recession.


I posted this in another thread but it works here as well:



For those who don't understand the graph, longer-term securities normally have better yields. For shorter-term yields to be above longer-terms, it means market players are purchasing many more long-term securities (driving the price down and the price of shorter-term securities up). In other words, during normal market expansion we see the 10yr outperforming the 2yr. This is the "inverted yield curve".

While the yield curve isn't a driver nor is it a true predictor of recession, it's a representation of how investors see the upcoming economy. With that said, it's been accurate enough to be mistaken for a predictor.

Currently we are in a period of inversion that we haven't seen since the economic woes of the late 70s/early 80s (based on range of inversion combined with time length).
This post was edited on 5/5/23 at 10:41 am
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1799 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 10:24 am to
@Bard, here's a couple to go along with previous post... nothing bad gonna happen here.

Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 10:34 am to
quote:

What am I missing?


COVID pushed a lot of people who were delaying retirement over the edge. Gig work is bigger than ever, people who were flipping burgers started ubering and dashing and then service jobs had to raise wages. The infrastructure bill has created a lot of jobs/work for people in certain industries.

Like I've said before in a thread about inflation, they can say that we have to get unemployment up to fix the problem but the market is clearly saying it needs workers.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57978 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 10:35 am to
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 5/5/23 at 10:38 am to
Interesting to see 2008-2016 and then 2016-2020 there
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram