Started By
Message

re: n

Posted on 4/16/23 at 7:52 am to
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36862 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 7:52 am to
quote:

And you consider a .223 semi-auto rifle to be "military grade"?

What’s the difference between .223 and .556 that our military uses all the time? .556 is also on public market.

I have a Colt M4 which is literally the exact same thing I had in the military with only marginal differences between the public v military rifles. I don’t have burst fire but guess what, even GI Joe does not use burst fire. So losing that feature is no big deal at all. It is a waste of ammo and destroys accuracy.



I am very pro gun rights but you need to call a spade a spade.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28313 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 7:54 am to
quote:

I am very pro gun rights but you need to call a spade a spade.


Raciss!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262198 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 7:55 am to
Mass incarceration fixes this.

Posted by Warfox
B.R. Native (now in MA)
Member since Apr 2017
3170 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 7:56 am to
quote:

What’s the difference between .223 and .556 that our military uses all the time? .556 is also on public market. I have a Colt M4 which is literally the exact same thing I had in the military with only marginal differences between the public v military rifles. I don’t have burst fire but guess what, even GI Joe does not use burst fire. So losing that feature is no big deal at all. It is a waste of ammo and destroys accuracy. I am very pro gun rights but you need to call a spade a spade.


Military grade isn’t the issue here, and neither are guns. It’s the people committing these atrocities.

I don’t care if it’s military grade, it’s my right under the second amendment. In truth I ought to have access to full auto as well without a class III if we want to go there.

Edit: only punishing law-abiding, moral citizens, and empowering the tyranny of government with further gun restrictions.
This post was edited on 4/16/23 at 7:58 am
Posted by homesicktiger
High altitude hell
Member since Oct 2004
1380 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 8:04 am to
quote:

What’s the difference between .223 and .556 that our military uses all the time? .556 is also on public market.


So now, caliber determines "military grade?" We're fricked.
This post was edited on 4/16/23 at 8:06 am
Posted by BoogerNuts
Lake Charles
Member since Nov 2013
856 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 8:17 am to
quote:

What’s the difference between .223 and .556 that our military uses all the time? .556 is also on public market.

I have a Colt M4 which is literally the exact same thing I had in the military with only marginal differences between the public v military rifles. I don’t have burst fire but guess what, even GI Joe does not use burst fire. So losing that feature is no big deal at all. It is a waste of ammo and destroys accuracy.



I am very pro gun rights but you need to call a spade a spade.


So, you do not own an M4, which you literally just said you "literally" own. You are "literally" lying. So a "marginal" difference is jumping from semi-auto (an AR-15) to full auto at the cost of upwards of $100k just to be able to obtain one legally? You can just say you are full of shite, its ok.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7519 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

.556

Hahahahahaha, Jesus fricking Christ you fricking loser
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24717 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 7:11 pm to
First, it’s 5.56…. 2nd, you dumb.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17513 posts
Posted on 4/16/23 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

What’s the difference between .223 and .556 that our military uses all the time? .556 is also on public market.

I have a Colt M4 which is literally the exact same thing I had in the military with only marginal differences between the public v military rifles. I don’t have burst fire but guess what, even GI Joe does not use burst fire. So losing that feature is no big deal at all. It is a waste of ammo and destroys accuracy.


The weapon platform you are talking about was initially not designed for the military but don’t let facts get in the way.

And as of yet I have not seen anyone post what weapon was used…..but let’s jump to conclusions guys.
This post was edited on 4/16/23 at 10:40 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73081 posts
Posted on 4/17/23 at 6:46 am to
quote:

What’s the difference between .223 and .556 that our military uses all the time? .556 is also on public market.


Who gives a shite. The point is that "military grade" is a useless label slapped on it to draw out emotion from idiots who don't know any better. Like "weapons of war" or "common sense gun safety."

quote:

I am very pro gun rights but




Classic.
Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
5358 posts
Posted on 4/17/23 at 6:51 am to
quote:

but you need to call a spade a spade.


You can't call them that anymore.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram