- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
12
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:38 pm to fareplay
quote:No Henry Ford is coming for you. This is all about undoing what Henry Ford did.
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:42 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:59 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
true, but it also was not subsidized by horse owners taxes and the government did not go out and build gas stations with horse owners tax money.
No one threatened to make horse illegal by a certain arbitrary date, and no one blamed horses for the end of the world, or tried to force them to get rid of their horse.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:10 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
They just invented electricity? Nah. Electricity prices aren’t getting significantly cheaper for a very long time
Posted on 2/13/23 at 4:27 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
too bad we arent on the first electric vehicle.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 4:39 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
Good thing we banned horses
Posted on 2/13/23 at 5:21 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
slightly OT but
quote:
In a hypothetical tug-of-war between a horse and a vehicle with 1 horsepower, the outcome would depend on several factors such as the weight of the vehicle, the traction of its tires on the ground, the strength of its suspension and transmission components, and the torque it is capable of generating at its wheels.
In general, a horse has much greater pulling power than a vehicle with just 1 horsepower, due to the horsepower-to-weight ratio and its muscular anatomy that is well-adapted for pulling. However, if the vehicle has a heavy weight, large tires with good traction, and a robust suspension and transmission, it might be able to hold its own against the horse.
It's worth noting that this is a theoretical scenario, as tug-of-wars between live animals and motor vehicles are ethically and morally problematic, and should not be attempted.
ChatGPT
Posted on 2/13/23 at 6:08 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
I bet owning a horse was also more expensive than walking. What’s your point?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 6:35 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
Bet the government didn't threaten folks or offer subsidies to sell Model Ts.
If it's a good idea, folks will buy. If it's a bad product then persuasion and arm twisting becomes necessary.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 7:03 pm to fareplay
quote:I bet the first wife was a pain in the arse but billions of marriages later, here we are.
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 8:55 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
Maybe so but which had more horsepower?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 9:53 pm to fareplay
quote:
I bet the first car was also more expensive to run than a horse.
You’re comparing something that is much more efficient and sustainable than a horse. Now you’re comparing something that is much more efficient and sustainable to an electric vehicle. The gas guzzler still wins.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News