- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Christian Students Sue Smithsonian for Kicking Them Out over Pro-Life Hats
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:10 am
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:10 am
sorry if already posted but this is ridiculous
Christian students are suing the Smithsonian National Air Space Museum (NASM) for allegedly violating their First and Fifth Amendment rights by kicking them out for wearing pro-life hats following the 50th annual March for Life.
The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed the lawsuit on Monday in the federal district court for the District of Columbia on behalf of nine students and three parents it says were “unlawfully targeted for their religious pro-life views” on January 20, 2023.
According to the complaint, students, parents, and chaperones from Our Lady of the Rosary Church and School in South Carolina went to the museum following the March for Life. The group members were wearing hats that said, “Rosary Pro-Life.”
“Following their participation in the March for Life event, Plaintiffs visited the NASM whereby all Plaintiffs were subjected to a pattern of ongoing misconduct by at least five different staff, personnel, employees and/or security guards of NASM including Defendants Jane Does and John Does, which included targeting, harassment, discrimination and, ultimately, eviction from NASM simply because they wore blue hats with the inscription, ‘Rosary Pro-Life,’” the complaint states.
Museum staff allegedly mocked the students, called them expletives, and told them their hats were “political statements” and that they were “not promoting equality.” Staff also allegedly told them that the museum is a “neutral zone” and that the First Amendment “does not apply here.” The complaint notes that several other museum patrons were wearing hats and masks, some of which had rainbow “Pride” graphics
“What the Smithsonian did is beyond reprehensible. These were students simply wearing a hat that passively expressed their support for life on the basis of their Christian faith,” said Jordan Sekulow, ACLJ’s executive director. “The way these students, many of whom were minors, were treated by their federal government – the Smithsonian and its employees – should shock everyone to the core. It’s not only abhorrent; it’s blatantly unconstitutional. And that’s why we’re fighting back.”
The lawsuit further points out that the NASM is a government agency that receives roughly 70 percent of its funding from federal appropriations to support its operations.
“As a federal government entity, NASM and its officers, agents and employees are mandated to comply with the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act),” the complaint states.
The ACLJ is asking the court to enjoin defendants from “unlawfully targeting Plaintiff, for disparate treatment and particular scrutiny based on content and viewpoint or association.” The lawsuit also requests that museum employees receive “appropriate training” to make sure their “conduct complies with federal law and the United States Constitution.” Additionally, even though ACLJ generally represents clients for free, if the students prevail on the RFRA claim, the court could order the Smithsonian to pay what would have been the students’ attorneys fees if ACLJ had charged them.
LINK
Christian students are suing the Smithsonian National Air Space Museum (NASM) for allegedly violating their First and Fifth Amendment rights by kicking them out for wearing pro-life hats following the 50th annual March for Life.
The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed the lawsuit on Monday in the federal district court for the District of Columbia on behalf of nine students and three parents it says were “unlawfully targeted for their religious pro-life views” on January 20, 2023.
According to the complaint, students, parents, and chaperones from Our Lady of the Rosary Church and School in South Carolina went to the museum following the March for Life. The group members were wearing hats that said, “Rosary Pro-Life.”
“Following their participation in the March for Life event, Plaintiffs visited the NASM whereby all Plaintiffs were subjected to a pattern of ongoing misconduct by at least five different staff, personnel, employees and/or security guards of NASM including Defendants Jane Does and John Does, which included targeting, harassment, discrimination and, ultimately, eviction from NASM simply because they wore blue hats with the inscription, ‘Rosary Pro-Life,’” the complaint states.
Museum staff allegedly mocked the students, called them expletives, and told them their hats were “political statements” and that they were “not promoting equality.” Staff also allegedly told them that the museum is a “neutral zone” and that the First Amendment “does not apply here.” The complaint notes that several other museum patrons were wearing hats and masks, some of which had rainbow “Pride” graphics
“What the Smithsonian did is beyond reprehensible. These were students simply wearing a hat that passively expressed their support for life on the basis of their Christian faith,” said Jordan Sekulow, ACLJ’s executive director. “The way these students, many of whom were minors, were treated by their federal government – the Smithsonian and its employees – should shock everyone to the core. It’s not only abhorrent; it’s blatantly unconstitutional. And that’s why we’re fighting back.”
The lawsuit further points out that the NASM is a government agency that receives roughly 70 percent of its funding from federal appropriations to support its operations.
“As a federal government entity, NASM and its officers, agents and employees are mandated to comply with the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act),” the complaint states.
The ACLJ is asking the court to enjoin defendants from “unlawfully targeting Plaintiff, for disparate treatment and particular scrutiny based on content and viewpoint or association.” The lawsuit also requests that museum employees receive “appropriate training” to make sure their “conduct complies with federal law and the United States Constitution.” Additionally, even though ACLJ generally represents clients for free, if the students prevail on the RFRA claim, the court could order the Smithsonian to pay what would have been the students’ attorneys fees if ACLJ had charged them.
LINK
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:12 am to Tom Joad
Sad that right wingers think they can wear their assault hats in public now
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:15 am to Tom Joad
And the Smithsonian gets $1.144 billion from the Federal Government in 2023. I hope they win the lawsuit.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:15 am to Tom Joad
It’s about time to start fighting back against these left wing nuts
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:15 am to Tom Joad
I bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
ETA:
ETA:
This post was edited on 2/9/23 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:18 am to Loup
quote:
I bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
I bet not. In fact I bet the students were advised prior to the visit not to initiate or to engage.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:19 am to Loup
quote:
I bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
Yeah that’s how it always works out right?
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:22 am to Tom Joad
quote:
The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)
I've seen this group in a few lawsuit articles recently. I assume this is the ACLU for conservatives? Since the actual ACLU is full of left wing nutjobs.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:22 am to Tom Joad
The Smithsonian is not an executive branch agency and does not exercise regulatory powers, except over its own buildings and grounds. Thus, courts have held that the Smithsonian is not an agency or authority of the Government as those terms are used in certain laws applicable to executive branch agencies such as the Privacy Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Federal Advisory Committee Act. However, the U.S. Attorney General has concluded that the Smithsonian is so "closely connected" to the federal government that it shares the immunity of the United States from state and local regulation. In accordance with this doctrine, local zoning regulations, ABC licensing provisions, sales and use taxes, and real estate taxes are not applicable to the Smithsonian absent a specific federal statute. (There are several instances in which Congress has required federal entities to comply with state and local laws, so questions about the applicability of specific state and local laws to the Smithsonian should be directed to the Office of General Counsel.)
Courts have also held that the Smithsonian enjoys the immunity of the United States from lawsuits, unless such suits are authorized by Congress under specific statutes, such as the Federal Torts Claim Act (torts), the U.S. Copyright Act (copyright infringement), the Tucker Act (contracts), and Title VII the Civil Rights Act (discrimination).
Courts have also held that the Smithsonian enjoys the immunity of the United States from lawsuits, unless such suits are authorized by Congress under specific statutes, such as the Federal Torts Claim Act (torts), the U.S. Copyright Act (copyright infringement), the Tucker Act (contracts), and Title VII the Civil Rights Act (discrimination).
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:22 am to Loup
quote:
I bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
Typical victim blaming.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:23 am to Loup
quote:
bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
The lessons of Sandman are soon forgotten
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:23 am to Tom Joad
Just like the kid wearing the trump hat and the 'medicine man,' there's probably more to this story.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:23 am to Loup
Yeah those nefarious alt right kids from Our Lady of the Rosary Church and School. Always causing trouble for the peaceful left.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:24 am to Kracka
Seems to me that the March For Life produces a multi-million dollar lawsuit every year now for discrimination against conservatives.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:25 am to Loup
quote:
I bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
Yea you gotta watch out for these types. I’m surprised the nuns didn’t burn it to the ground .
students, parents, and chaperones from Our Lady of the Rosary Church and School in South Carolina went to the museum following the March for Life.
I’m sure there’s security video in the Smithsonian. Shouldn’t be hard to figure out who the assholes are.
This post was edited on 2/9/23 at 8:40 am
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:27 am to Tom Joad
The war on Christianity and free speech continues. If you aren't left, you are wrong.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:29 am to Teufelhunden
quote:
Just like the kid wearing the trump hat and the 'medicine man,' there's probably more to this story.
What more was there to that story, pray tell?
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:32 am to Tom Joad
At first glance I thought the “woke” institutions were overreaching again.
But wearing “Rosary pro-life” hats following a pro-life March smells more like an organized stunt than just a few kids wearing Christian hats. Maybe there is more to the story.
But wearing “Rosary pro-life” hats following a pro-life March smells more like an organized stunt than just a few kids wearing Christian hats. Maybe there is more to the story.
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:33 am to Loup
quote:
I bet the students were being just as big of d*ck heads as the employees
Just like those Covington kids were to that lyin injun, right?
Posted on 2/9/23 at 8:36 am to MugMan
quote:
What more was there to that story, pray tell?
I'm talking about the overreaction and conclusion jumping from the press and the left when the small piece of the video was shown.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News