Started By
Message

The Top 10 Deadliest Battles in U.S. Military History

Posted on 2/4/23 at 4:44 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
66066 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 4:44 pm
I doubt very seriously we will ever see ten battles on this tragic and deadly of a scale for a very long time. Number one on the list is definitely one you don't hear about too often.

quote:

1. The Meuse-Argonne Offensive (World War I) - 26,277 U.S. fatalities
2. The Battle of the Bulge (World War II) - 19,276 U.S. fatalities
3. The Battle of Okinawa (World War II) - 12,513 U.S. fatalities
4. The Battle of Hurtgen Forest (World War II) - 8,157 U.S. fatalities
5. The Battle of Gettysburg (Civil War) - 7,863 U.S. fatalities [Union & Confederate]
6. The Battle of Guadalcanal (World War II) - 7,099 U.S. fatalities
7. The Battle of Iwo Jima (World War II) - 6,821 U.S. fatalities
8. The Battle of Pusan Perimeter (Korean War) - 4,599 U.S. fatalities
9. The Battle of Spotsylvania Court House (Civil War) - 4,192 U.S. fatalities [Union & Confederate]
10. The Battle of Chickamauga (Civil War) - 3,969 U.S. fatalities [Union & Confederate]
Posted by MugMan
Member since Dec 2022
442 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 4:46 pm to
Uh, no Antietam?
Posted by lsufan9193969700
3 miles from B.R.
Member since Sep 2003
55347 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 4:50 pm to
The numbers blow my mind. It's hard to wrap your mind around them. #10 for example, is nearly 4k. I might have known 1000 names of Marines and Sailors while I was active and only know of 7 actual brothers who perished in the middle east since 2001. 1000 and 7 seem like huge numbers to me. 4k casualties? 26k casualties? That is mind blowing. Hell, Camp Lejuene might have only had 30-35k active Marines on base when I was stationed there.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 4:51 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
266211 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

1. The Meuse-Argonne Offensive (World War I) - 26,277 U.S. fatalities
2. The Battle of the Bulge (World War II) - 19,276 U.S. fatalities


Seems NE France and Belgium are not friendly territories for the fighting man..
Posted by sledgehammer
SWLA
Member since Oct 2020
3883 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:14 pm to
Off shoot of this topic, but the deadliest place and time in history has to be Tokyo, Japan on the night of March 9 during the B-29 firebombings. Greater than 100k deaths and thousands more casualties in one night! It really puts those battle fatalities in perspective.
This post was edited on 2/4/23 at 5:21 pm
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4748 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:16 pm to
I can't take your little list very seriously when you've got Gettysburg at #5 but don't even mention the Battle of Schrute Farms at all
Posted by NWLATigerFan12
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2011
12483 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:20 pm to
The difference between these is that most of the World War 1/2 battles took place over the course of weeks or even months.

Those Civil War battles were mostly 1-2 days, granted that both sides fatalities are both counted in those.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25613 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

4. The Battle of Hurtgen Forest (World War II) - 8,157 U.S. fatalities



Doesnt get enough press. patton got our riflemen chewed up and spit out. big reason why we had such a manpower shortage during the bulge
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
5253 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:29 pm to
My grandfather was in The Battle of the Bulge, Operation Varsity. I have several Nazi uniform regalia and two daggers my grandfather took from SS soldiers.



Posted by iwantacooler
Member since Aug 2017
2295 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:31 pm to
If the confederates seceded, why are they counted as US casualties?
Posted by tigahbruh
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2014
2858 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:36 pm to
The one issue I have with this list is that it doesnt distinguish between battles, which last 1 to a few days, and campaigns, which can last months. And as far as campaigns go, Normandy would have to be up there.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
29651 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:45 pm to
No seige of the US Capital in 2021?
Posted by deeprig9
2023/24 B2B GSB Riboff Champ
Member since Sep 2012
66448 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:45 pm to
If you include both sides, Kennesaw Mountain was 4000.
Posted by Cajunhawk81
Member since Jan 2021
2511 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 5:53 pm to
Spotsylvania Court House doesn’t frick around.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3517 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:05 pm to
Siege of Port Hudson

East Baton Rouge Parish

Union General Banks -

“Banks continued the siege. Finally, on July 9 with the Confederate garrison reduced to eating mules and rats, Port Hudson surrendered. Over the 45-day siege Banks lost approximately 10,000 men, half from disease. The Union gained absolute control of the Mississippi River.”

LINK

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
71381 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:29 pm to

Still pales in comparison to French casualties at the battle of Verdun, nearly 400,000.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
66010 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

1. The Meuse-Argonne Offensive (World War I) - 26,277 U.S. fatalities


What’s sad is probably less than 10% of Americans have ever even heard of this battle and only a fraction of those who have know any details.

Instead of teaching our country’s history, schools are more worried about teaching our kids about cross-dressing, homosexual fetishism, and white guilt.
Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
22291 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:20 pm to
2nd ID at the Chosin Reservoir, hooooah!!
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
10730 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

I doubt very seriously we will ever see ten battles on this tragic and deadly of a scale for a very long time.
9/11 was just shy of 3k initial deaths but I think the number is probably in the top 8 of this list of you can formulate a number from the first responders in the initial days who have died due to being there.

I would argue that the next attack on this list that we will see is civilian deaths due to chemical/nuclear bombs. Just look how easy it was for the Chinese to fly a balloon with a payload the size of a bus over the length of the continental US. Imagine that being a chemical weapon spraying it's payload aimed at people and our food supply.

Overseas I think we are in the position to not have to send troops overseas in any large numbers. We can fly drones controlled from bases here and and if need be rely on Naval Ships & Carriers to be our forward in the field bases. Aside for not openly flying drones controlled from the US, I think Ukraine is the likely example of what our involvement in another European war would look like.
Posted by VernonPLSUfan
Leesville, La.
Member since Sep 2007
16560 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

I) - 26,277 U.S. fatalities
So to believe this number of deaths, would the total of American forces be in Europe around 100,000?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram